Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

Prognostic Performance of qSOFA in Pulmonary Embolism

Sayfa
259–263
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: In this study, we found that the qSOFA score performed well in predicting in-hospital mortality and ICU admission in patients with acute PE admitted to the emergency department.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: This study aimed to investigate the role of the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score in determining the prognosis of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: This study included patients aged >18 years who were admitted to the emergency department for complaints of shortness of breath and/or chest pain for 3 years and who were found to have acute PE on computed tomography pulmonary angiography.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: In this study, we found that the qSOFA score performed well in predicting in-hospital mortality and ICU admission in patients with acute PE admitted to the emergency department.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the role of the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score in determining the prognosis of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Materials and Methods: This study included patients aged >18 years who were admitted to the emergency department for complaints of shortness of breath and/or chest pain for 3 years and who were found to have acute PE on computed tomography pulmonary angiography. The qSOFA, pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI), and simplified PESI scores were calculated in patients with acute PE. During follow-up, the in-hospital mortality and requirement of intensive care continuation were determined. Results: In total, 166 patients with acute PE, of which 88 (53%) were female, were included. The mean age of the patients was 67.4±17.3 years, and 26 (15.7%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The mortality rate was 9% (n=15). The predictive value of qSOFA in predicting in-hospital mortality [area under the curve (AUC) 0.907, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.852-0.946] was similar to that of PESI (AUC: 0.846, 95% CI: 0.782-0.897) and sPESI (AUC: 0.796, 95% CI: 0.726–0.854) (p=0.23 and p=0.16, respectively). While it was superior to PESI (AUC: 0.794, 95% CI: 0.724-0.852) and sPESI (AUC: 0.721, 95% CI: 0.646-0.787) in determining the admission of patients in the ICU (AUC: 0.882, 95% CI: 0.823-0.927) (p=0.04 and p=0.01, respectively). A positive correlation was found between qSOFA and PESI (r=0.49, p=0.001) and sPESI (r=036, p=0.001). Conclusion: In this study, we found that the qSOFA score performed well in predicting in-hospital mortality and ICU admission in patients with acute PE admitted to the emergency department.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ateşçelik, M., Gürger, M., Yılmaz, M., Atılgan, F. A. (2022). Prognostic Performance of qSOFA in Pulmonary Embolism. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 259–263. https://ajindex.com/articles/507927

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Chuang LH, Gumbs P, van Hout B, Agnelli G, Kroep S, Monreal M, et al. Health-related quality of life and mortality in patients with pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study in seven European countries. Qual Life Res. 2019;28:2111-24
  2. Pollack CV, Schreiber D, Goldhaber SZ, Slattery D, Fanikos J, O’Neil BJ, et al. Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: initial report of EMPEROR (Multicenter Emergency Medicine Pulmonary Embolism in the Real World Registry). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:700-6
  3. Corrigan D, Prucnal C, Kabrhel C. Pulmonary embolism: the diagnosis, riskstratification, treatment and disposition of emergency department patients. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016;3:117-25
  4. Zhou XY, Ben SQ, Chen HL, Ni SS. The prognostic value of pulmonary embolism severity index in acute pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Respir Res. 2012;13:111
  5. Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, Bueno H, Geersing GJ, Harjola VP, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2020;41:543-603
  6. Howard LS, Barden S, Condliffe R, Connolly V, Davies C, Donaldson J, et al. British Thoracic Society Guideline for the initial outpatient management of pulmonary embolism. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2018;5:e000281
  7. Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, Seymour CW, Liu VX, Deutschman CS, et al. Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:775-87
  8. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, Brunkhorst FM, Rea TD, Scherag A, et al. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:762-74
  9. Singer AJ, Ng J, Thode HC Jr, Spiegel R, Weingart S. Quick SOFA Scores Predict Mortality in Adult Emergency Department Patients With and Without Suspected Infection. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;69:475-9
  10. Karalezli A. Pulmonary Embolism. Uptades on Pulmonary Diseases. 2018;6:16-35
  11. Canet E, Taylor DM, Khor R, Krishnan V, Bellomo R. qSOFA as predictor of mortality and prolonged ICU admission in Emergency Department patients with suspected infection. J Crit Care. 2018;48:118-23
  12. Shu E, Ives Tallman C, Frye W, Boyajian JG, Farshidpour L, Young M, et