Retrospective, prospective, and cohort studies and meta-analyses were 28.24%, and studies on the treatment of complications resulting from drug poisoning were 15.29%.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:AbstractAim: This study aimed to evaluate studies on drug poisoning and emergency servics published in PubMed between January 2019 and January 2020.Materials and Methods: The literature review was carried out using the terms “drug poisoning and emergency medicine” in PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez) January 2019 and January 2020.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:All summaries defined in the searches were reviewed, and suitable studies were selected.Results: Eighty-five studies were identified in PubMed between January 2019 and January 2020. 28.24% (24) of these studies are retrospective, prospective, and cohort studies and meta-analyses. 56.47% (48) were original studies, of which 20.83% (20) were on narcotic poisoning (opioid, synthetic cannabinoids, cannabis, and heroin), 8.33% (4) were on overdose paracetamol poisoning, 8.33% (4) were on allergic reactions due to drug use, 6.25% (3) were on acute alcohol poisoning, and 56.25% were other original studies.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Retrospective, prospective, and cohort studies and meta-analyses were 28.24%, and studies on the treatment of complications resulting from drug poisoning were 15.29%.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
AbstractAim: This study aimed to evaluate studies on drug poisoning and emergency servics published in PubMed between January 2019 and January 2020.Materials and Methods: The literature review was carried out using the terms “drug poisoning and emergency medicine” in PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez) January 2019 and January 2020. All summaries defined in the searches were reviewed, and suitable studies were selected.Results: Eighty-five studies were identified in PubMed between January 2019 and January 2020. 28.24% (24) of these studies are retrospective, prospective, and cohort studies and meta-analyses. 56.47% (48) were original studies, of which 20.83% (20) were on narcotic poisoning (opioid, synthetic cannabinoids, cannabis, and heroin), 8.33% (4) were on overdose paracetamol poisoning, 8.33% (4) were on allergic reactions due to drug use, 6.25% (3) were on acute alcohol poisoning, and 56.25% were other original studies. Studies on treating intoxication complications were 15.29%. Conclusion: According to this annual evaluation, the most common studies on applications in emergency departments and poison centers were original articles on drug poisoning, 56.47%. Retrospective, prospective, and cohort studies and meta-analyses were 28.24%, and studies on the treatment of complications resulting from drug poisoning were 15.29%.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
HANCI, İ. H., GÜRBÜZ, N. (2022). Anual Evaluation of “Drug Poisonings, Emergency Service” StudiesPublished in Pubmed 01.01.2019-01.01.2020. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 65–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/507920
Sungur S, Bilge U, Acar N, Unluoglu I. Retrospective evaluation of adult poisoning cases admitted to emergency department of a University Hospital in Turkey. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21:1023-8
Lund C, Vallersnes OM, Jacobsen D, Ekeberg O, Hovda KE. Outpatient treatment of acute poisonings in Oslo: poisoning pattern, factors associated with hospitalization, and mortality. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012;20:1
Greene S. General Management of Poisoned Patients. In Judith E. Tintinalli, J. Stephan Stapczynski, O. John Ma, Donald M. Yealy, Garth D. Meckler, David M. Cline (Eds) Tintinalli’s Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide, 8th edition; Mc. Graw- Hill, USA 2016
Vale A, Bradberry S. Poisoning: Introduction - Medicine 2016;44:75
Dal O, Kavak H, Akay S, Ünlüer EE, Aksay E. Retrospective evaluation of poisoning patients in the emergency department. Çağdaş Tıp Derg. 2013;3:22-7
Baydin A, Yardan T, Aygun D, Doganay Z, Nargis C, Incealtin O. Retrospective evaluation of emergency service patients with poisoning: a 3-year study. Adv Ther. 2005;22:650-8
Ozcan N. Summary of the National Poison Information Center 2008 Annual Report. Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg. 2009;66:29-58
Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, Blais R, Brown A, Cox J, et al. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ. 2004;170:1678-86
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2000
Forster AJ, Asmis TR, Clark HD, Al Saied G, Code CC, Caughey SC, et al. Ottawa Hospital Patient Safety Study: incidence and timing of adverse events in patients admitted to a Canadian teaching hospital. CMAJ. 2004;170:1235-40
Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG, Localio AR, Barnes BA, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:377-84
Zed PJ, Abu-Laban RB, Balen RM, Loewen PS, Hohl CM, Brubacher JR, et al. Incidence, severity and preventability of medication-related visits to the emergency department: a prospective study. CMAJ. 2008;178:1563-9
Hohl CM, Yu E, Hunte GS, Brubacher JR, Hosseini F, Argent CP, et al. Clinical decision rules to improve the detection of adverse drug events in emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19:640-9