Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Implementing a Simulation-Based Distance Learning Model: How to Facilitate High-Engagement Experiential Training While Reducing the Risk of Infectious Disease Transmission Amongst Healthcare Professionals

Sayfa
126–131
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We think this model can achieve positive results using distance clinical simulation combining their traditional simulation technology to address the training needs of their healthcare organization.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: We aim to describe and evaluate a new model for distance experiential learningin order to help reduce the transmission risk among professionals envolved in education activities.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: In April 2020, in partnership with our hospital’s Emergency Department Educational Leadership, Valdecilla Virtual Hospital tested and introduced an experiential distance learning model.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We think this model can achieve positive results using distance clinical simulation combining their traditional simulation technology to address the training needs of their healthcare organization.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: We aim to describe and evaluate a new model for distance experiential learningin order to help reduce the transmission risk among professionals envolved in education activities. Materials and Methods: In April 2020, in partnership with our hospital’s Emergency Department Educational Leadership, Valdecilla Virtual Hospital tested and introduced an experiential distance learning model. Professionals wanted to engage from their homes without having to travel to a simulation facility. Results: Between July 1 and 22, 2020 we ran seven courses following this new model of course. Each one consisted of a two-hour session on two consecutive days. There were 44 participants whose ages ranged from 26 to 53 years (average=40), 62% identified as female, and 68% reported working at the emergency department, 19% at the cardiology unit, 7% in primary care, and 5% in internal medicine. We evaluated the content validity, feasibility and acceptability of the model. The results of an anonymous survey filled in at the end of the course showed they considered the distance training model as realistic (92%), easy to use (95%), well-organized (94%), an engaging educational tool (94%), and desirable for practising in the future (94%). Conclusion: These results may encourage the educational community to develop more programs using this new approach of “taking care of patients from a distance” not only during a pandemic, but also on a regular basis. We think this model can achieve positive results using distance clinical simulation combining their traditional simulation technology to address the training needs of their healthcare organization.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALONSO, H., HOLANDA, M. S., MORAL, I. D., PIEDRA, L., MAESTRE, J. M. (2022). Implementing a Simulation-Based Distance Learning Model: How to Facilitate High-Engagement Experiential Training While Reducing the Risk of Infectious Disease Transmission Amongst Healthcare Professionals. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 126–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/507887

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. McGaghie WC, Draycott TJ, Dunn WF, Lopez CM, Stefanidis D. Evaluating the impact of simulation on translational patient outcomes. Simul Healthc. 2011;6 Suppl(Suppl):S42-7
  2. Armstrong E, Parsa-Parsi R. How can physicians’ learning styles drive educational planning? Acad Med. 2005;80:680-4
  3. Del Moral I, Maestre JM. A view at the practical application of simulation in 15 professional education. Trends Anaesth Crit Care. 2013;3:146-51
  4. Kerfoot BP, Baker H. An online spaced-education game for global continuing medical education: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2012;256:33-8
  5. Verkuyl M, Lapum JL, Hughes M, McCulloch T, Liu L, Mastrilli P, et al. Virtual gaming simulation: exploring self-debriefing, virtual debriefing, and inperson debriefing. Clin Simul Nursing. 2018;20:7-14
  6. Rojo E, Torres B, de la Fuente A, Oruña C, Villoria F, Del Moral I, Maestre JM. La simulación como herramienta para facilitar el cambio en las organizaciones sanitarias [Simulation as a tool to facilitate change in healthcare organisations]. J Healthc Qual Res. 2020;35:183-90
  7. Padilha JM, Machado PP, Ribeiro A, Ramos J, Costa P. Clinical Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e11529
  8. Khalil MK, Elkhider IA. Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Adv Physiol Educ. 2016;40:147-56
  9. Kontos MC, Diercks DB, Kirk JD. Emergency department and office-based evaluation of patients with chest pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:284-99
  10. Roussin CJ, Larraz E, Jamieson K, Maestre JM. Psychological safety, selfefficacy, and speaking up in interprofessional health care simulation. Clin Simul Nursing. 2018;17:38-46
  11. Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the presimulation briefing. Simul Healthc. 2014;9:339-49
  12. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. There’s no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc. 2006;1:49-55
  13. Normand SL, McNeil BJ, Peterson LE, Palmer RH. Eliciting expert opinion using the Delphi technique: identifying performance indicators for cardiovascular disease. Int J Qual Health Care. 1998;10:247-60
  14. Brett-Fleegler M, Rudolph J, Eppich W, Monuteaux M, Fleegler E, Cheng A, Simon R. Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare: development and psychometric properties. Simul Healthc. 2012;7:288-94
  15. Rudolph J