Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2009 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 35

Micropolitics of the Staff Meeting in a Taiwanese Primary School

Sayfa
21–38
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study suggests that the micropolitical lens should be applied to both negative forms (i.e. conflict) of interpersonal relationships as well as in cooperative ones (i.e. collaboration, collegial) within school settings.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Problem Statement: Micropolitics can be used as a useful lens to investigate how shareholders within the school exercise their formal and informal power to achieve their goals and protect their interests.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Although quite a few studies have concentrated on teacher culture and school management, less attention has been paid to staff relationships through the lens of micropolitics.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study suggests that the micropolitical lens should be applied to both negative forms (i.e. conflict) of interpersonal relationships as well as in cooperative ones (i.e. collaboration, collegial) within school settings.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Problem Statement: Micropolitics can be used as a useful lens to investigate how shareholders within the school exercise their formal and informal power to achieve their goals and protect their interests. Although quite a few studies have concentrated on teacher culture and school management, less attention has been paid to staff relationships through the lens of micropolitics. This study focuses on the staff meeting, which as part of a weekly routine within the school, can become a political arena. The study explores, through the lens of micropolitics, how teachers and administrators (including the principal) interact with one another at the researched site. Purpose of the Study: The research aims to investigate how teachers and administrators use formal and informal power, particularly at the staff meetings at the researched site, from the micropolitical perspective, taking into account power struggles, professional dilemmas and political tensions that impact school innovations and teacher culture and practices. Methods: This study employs the ethnographic case-study approach, through participant observation and in-depth interviews, conducted over a 5-month period in a Taiwanese primary school. The data was triangulated and analyzed thematically. Findings and Results: Research findings indicate that the staff meetings at the school reinforced collegial intimacy and enhanced staff morale. However, despite some positive outcomes, such as building a sense of community, the staff meeting is under the political control of administrators (particularly the principal) who often transmit information through pseudo-participation to legitimate and maintain the nature of hierarchy. In addition, micropolitical tensions between teaching and senior staff due to their divergent interests could be found at the staff meeting. Conclusions and Recommendations: On the whole, the relationships among school members at the investigated site seemed to be positive, with a positive outlook for the future; however, hidden conflicts might still emerge. This study suggests that the micropolitical lens should be applied to both negative forms (i.e. conflict) of interpersonal relationships as well as in cooperative ones (i.e. collaboration, collegial) within school settings.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CHEN, H. (2022). Micropolitics of the Staff Meeting in a Taiwanese Primary School. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 35, 21–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/507581

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Achinstein, B. (2002). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104 (3), 421-455.
  2. Achinstein, B. (2006). New teacher and mentor political literacy: Reading, navigating and transforming induction contexts. Teachers and Teaching, 12(2), 123-138.
  3. Acker, S. (1999). The realities of teachers’ work: Never a dull moment. London: Cassell. Atkinson, P. (1983). The reproduction of the professional community. In R. Dingwall & P. Lewis (Eds.), The sociology of the professions: Lawyers, doctors and others (pp. 221-245). London: Macmillan. Baldridge, J. V. (1971). Power and conflict in the university: Research in the sociology of complex organisations. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Ball, S. J. (1987). The micropolitics of the school: Towards a theory of school organisation. London: Methuen. Ball, S. J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education: Explorations in policy sociology. London: Routledge. Blase, J. (1987). Political interaction among teachers: Sociocultural contexts in the schools. Urban Education, 22(3), 286-309.
  4. Blase, J. (1989). The micropolitics of the school: The everyday political orientation of teachers toward open school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(4), 377-407.
  5. Blase, J. (1990). Some negative effects of principals’ control-oriented and protective political behaviour. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 727-753.
  6. Blase, J. (1991a). The micropolitical perspective. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict and cooperation (pp. 1-18). London: Sage. Blase, J. (1991b). Everyday political perspectives of teachers toward students. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict and cooperation (pp. 185-206). London: Sage. Blase, J. & Anderson, G. (1995). The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment. London: Cassell. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1997). The micropolitical orientation of facilitative school principals and its effects on teachers’ sense of empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 35, 138-164.
  7. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Burns, T. (1961). Micropolitics: mechanisms of institutional change. Administration Science Quarterly, 6, 257-281.
  8. Cooper, B. S., Ehrensal, P. A. L., & Bromme, M. (2005). School-level politics and professional development: Traps in evaluating the quality of