Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 46

An Evaluation of Environmental Responsibility and Its Associated Factors: Reflections from PISA 2006

Sayfa
41–62
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Being pessimistic about low ESCS coincides with lowenvironmental awareness and responsibility, but alternative means toameliorating this situation can be found by addressing national and evenregional factors.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Problem statement: Contemporary global environmental problems havehighlighted the importance of acting responsibly towards naturalresources and the environment.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Accordingly, “scientific literacy and the environment” was one ofthe research areas in the Programme for International Student Assessment(PISA) 2006.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Being pessimistic about low ESCS coincides with lowenvironmental awareness and responsibility, but alternative means toameliorating this situation can be found by addressing national and evenregional factors.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2006 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Problem statement: Contemporary global environmental problems havehighlighted the importance of acting responsibly towards naturalresources and the environment. The role of science education in shapinghow people interact with the environment, therefore, has gainedimportance. The science education community has responded to thischallenge by helping citizens develop responsibility for environmentalissues. Accordingly, “scientific literacy and the environment” was one ofthe research areas in the Programme for International Student Assessment(PISA) 2006. We attempted to examine patterns in Turkish students’environmental responsibility and to expose relationships between studentresponsibility for environmental issues and socio-demographic variables.We did this by assessing scientific literacy and evaluating anenvironmental database for Turkey in the context of PISA 2006.Specifically, the current study examined the extent to which Turkishstudents’ economic, social, and cultural status; school activities; parents’sense of responsibility and optimism regarding environmental issues andgender predicted their perceived responsibility towards the environment. Purpose of Study: This study evaluated students’ responsibility towards theenvironment and the relationship between perceived responsibility andseveral background variables, utilizing Turkish data obtained from theProgramme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006.Methods: Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) was used to examine theassociation between dependent and independent variables.Findings and Results: The findings suggested that 15-year-old Turkishstudents’ responsibility towards the environment varied with respect tosuch socio-demographic variables as gender; economic, social and culturalstatus; availability of school activities related to environmental topics andparental sense of responsibility for and optimism about environmentalissues. Among these, although the association was negative, parental levelof optimism regarding environmental issues explained the greatestamount of variation in student responsibility towards the environment.This was followed by parental sense of responsibility for environmentalissues.Conclusions and Recommendations: The overall picture disclosed by thisstudy is one in which economic, social and cultural status (ESCS) is theprimary feature shaping awareness and responsibility toward theenvironment. It is important to note that this result was obtained bysampling 15-year-old students in Turkey, where there is no strategy forenvironmental education. That is to say, if we were to gather backgrounddata on environmental awareness and responsibility in Turkey (althoughthese would be below the OECD average), and if we were to identify howthis awareness and responsibility have shaped the country’s economic,social and cultural status, which differs by region, then we might be ableto make plans to develop a tendency toward environmentalconsciousness. Such change would be important for the developingworld. Being pessimistic about low ESCS coincides with lowenvironmental awareness and responsibility, but alternative means toameliorating this situation can be found by addressing national and evenregional factors.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERBAŞ, A. K., TEKSOZ, G. T., TEKKAYA, C. (2022). An Evaluation of Environmental Responsibility and Its Associated Factors: Reflections from PISA 2006. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 46, 41–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/507458

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Alp, E., Ertepinar, H., Tekkaya, C., & Yilmaz, A. (2008). A study on elementary school students’ environmentally friendly behaviours and associated variables. Environmental Education Research, 14, 129–143.
  2. Barraza, L., & Walford, R. (2002). Environmental education: A comparison between English and Mexican school children. Environmental Education Research, 8, 171–186.
  3. Berberoglu, G., & Tosunoglu, C. (1995). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of an environmental attitude scale (EAS) for Turkish university students. Journal of Environmental Education, 26, 40–44.
  4. Bodur, M., & Sarigollu, E. (2005). Environmental sensitivity in a developing country: Consumer classification and implications. Environment and Behavior, 37, 487– 510. Bord, R. J., & O'Connor, R. E. (1997). The gender gap in environmental attitudes: The case of perceived vulnerability to risk: Research on the environment. Social Science Quarterly, 78(4), 830–840.
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1976). The school as a conservative force: Scholastic and cultural inequalities. In R. Dale, G. Esland, & M. MacDonal (Eds.), Schooling and capitalism (pp. 110–119). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Brundtland, G. (1987). Our common future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713.
  7. Carlisle, E. J. (2007). The sources and patterns of environmental knowledge among American high school seniors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara. Chu, H. E., Lee, E. A., Ko, H. R., Shin, D. H., Lee, M. N., Min, B. M., et al. (2007). Korean year 3 children's environmental literacy: A prerequisite for a Korean environmental education curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 731–746.
  8. Dietz, T., Kalof, L., & Stern, P. C. (2002). Gender, values, and environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 353–364.
  9. Eisler, A. D., Eisler, H., & Yoshida, M. (2003). Perception of human ecology: Crosscultural and gender comparisons. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 89– 101. Evans, G. W., Brauchle, G., Haq, A., Stecker, R., Wong, K., & Shapiro, E. (2007). Young children's environmental attitudes and behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 39, 635–659.
  10. Gambro, J., & Switzky, H. (1999). Variables associated with American high school students’ knowledge of environmental issues related to energy and pollution. Journal of