Dergiler / European Journal of Rheumatology / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

A study of the use of Behçet/Behçet’s disease or syndrome with or without Adamantiades in the medical literature during the past two decades

Sayfa
84–88
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The contributions of these scientists are undeniably significant, and honoring their importance is paramount.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Medical literature shows that some authors tend to use the eponym Behçet/Behçet’s disease/syndrome, whereas others use its amalgamated form, that is, Adamantiades-Behçet/Behçet’sdisease/syndrome.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We investigated the changes in the use of these eponyms over the past 2 decades.Methods: We used the PubMed database to search for publications that contained any of these nomenclatures using the appropriate tools available.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The contributions of these scientists are undeniably significant, and honoring their importance is paramount.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2000 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Medical literature shows that some authors tend to use the eponym Behçet/Behçet’s disease/syndrome, whereas others use its amalgamated form, that is, Adamantiades-Behçet/Behçet’sdisease/syndrome. We investigated the changes in the use of these eponyms over the past 2 decades.Methods: We used the PubMed database to search for publications that contained any of these nomenclatures using the appropriate tools available. Data were obtained for the title evaluated in thedatabase and variations of the title or its distribution by year with respect to the nomenclature foundin most related studies.Results: A total of 4,211 publications were found to use the original eponym compared with 96 publications that included the term Adamantiades from the year 2000 to the present. Considering thetitle of the articles, there was a declining use of the amalgamated form with Adamantiades from thefirst decade to the second decade, whereas there was an increasing use of Behçet/Behçet’s disease orsyndrome. In contrast, the relative percentages of all the reviewed articles that used the eponym disease or syndrome (without the amalgamated form) published in different specialty journals (rheumatology, ophthalmology, dermatology, and others) remained unchanged during the past 2 decades.Conclusion: The general trend was to use Behçet/Behçet’s disease or syndrome alone, although manyscientists have contributed to the literature related to this topic during the historical period. The contributions of these scientists are undeniably significant, and honoring their importance is paramount.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SARGIN, G., TURGUT, Y. B. (2022). A study of the use of Behçet/Behçet’s disease or syndrome with or without Adamantiades in the medical literature during the past two decades. European Journal of Rheumatology, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 84–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/507360

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (21)

  1. Mora B, Bosch X. Medical eponyms: Time for a name change. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170: 1499-1500
  2. Ferguson P, Thomas D. Medical eponyms. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect 2014; 31: 4
  3. Teive HA, Lima PM, Germiniani FM, Munhoz RP. What’s in a name? Problems, facts and controversies regarding neurological eponyms. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2016; 74: 423-5
  4. Woywodt A, Matteson E. Should eponyms be abandoned? Yes. BMJ 2007; 335: 424
  5. Matteson EL. All medical eponyms should be abandoned. La Presse Medicale 2008; 37: 250-1
  6. Kondziella D. Thirty neurological eponyms associated with the Nazi era. Eur Neurol 2009; 62: 56-64
  7. Coppes MJ, Beckwith B. Eponyms in medicine: Possessive or nonpossessive? J Pediatr 1993; 122: 165
  8. Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Bacon PA, Basu N, Cid MC, Ferrario F, et al. 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65: 1-11
  9. Yazici H, Seyahi E, Hatemi G, Yazici Y. Behçet syndrome: A contemporary view. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2018; 14: 119
  10. Behçet H. Über rezidivierende Aphtösedurch Ein Virus verursachte Geschwüre am Mund, am Auge und an der Genitalien. Derm Wschr 1937; 105: 1152-63
  11. Tan SY, Poole PS. Hulusi Behçet (1889-1948): Passion for dermatology. Singapore Med J 2016; 57: 408-9
  12. Feigenbaum A. Description of Behcet’s syndrome in the Hippocratic third book of endemic diseases. Br J Ophthalmol 1956; 40: 355-7
  13. Zouboulis CC, Keitel W. A historical review of early descriptions of Adamantiades-Behcet’s disease. J Invest Dermatol 2002; 119: 201-5
  14. Krause L. Adamantiades-Behcet’s disease. Ophthalmologe 2005; 102: 329-34
  15. Pearce JM. Neurological symptoms of Adamantiades-Behçet’s syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006; 77: 956-7
  16. Adamantiades B. A case of relapsing iritis with hypopyon (in Greek). Athens: Archia Iatrikis Etairias, 1930; 586-93
  17. Gilbert W. Arch Augenheik 1920; 86: 50-1
  18. Shigeta T. Recurrent iritis with hypopyon and its pathological findings. Acta Soc Ophthmol Jap 1924; 28: 516
  19. Fuchs A. Ueber chronische multiple Knotenbildung am Körper mit häufig rezidivierender eitriger Iritis und Skleritis. Deutsche Med Woch 1926; 36: 1502-5
  20. Planner H, Remenovsky F. Beitrage zur Kenntis der ulcerationen am ausseren weiblichen Genitale. Arch Dermatol Syph (Berlin) 1922; 111: 162-88
  21. Kaklamanis P, Grzybowski A, Palimeris GD, Aklamani KV, Zouboulis C. The first published case of Adamantiades-Behęet’s disease in the modern