Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2018 / Cilt: 76 - Sayı: 76

Investigation of School Effects on Student Achievement in Primary Education Using Value-Added Assessment

Sayfa
41–72
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It points out that the way Turkish schools are assessed is problematic and suggests that value added methods should be considered in evaluating the effects of schools.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the contribution of primary schools within the metropolitan municipality of the province of Ankara, Turkey to the achievement outcomes of 7th grade students using the results of the end of year Level Determination Exam.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The sample includes the 24 primary schools whose students have to the same school in both the 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 educational years within the territorial jurisdiction of the metropolitan municipality of capital of Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It points out that the way Turkish schools are assessed is problematic and suggests that value added methods should be considered in evaluating the effects of schools.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2007-2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the contribution of primary schools within the metropolitan municipality of the province of Ankara, Turkey to the achievement outcomes of 7th grade students using the results of the end of year Level Determination Exam. Research Methods: Carried out using a casual comparative study framework, the population of this study consists of the primary schools in the province of Ankara. The sample includes the 24 primary schools whose students have to the same school in both the 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 educational years within the territorial jurisdiction of the metropolitan municipality of capital of Turkey. The value-added effects of the schools in the sample on the student growth are assessed using a simple fixed-effect model. Moreover, in order to determine whether or not there exists a statistically significant relationship between the rankings of the schools according to average student achievement levels and the rankings according to the value-added effects on student growth, Kendall tau rank correlation coefficients are calculated. Findings: The results of this study indicate that there are significant inconsistencies between the rankings of the schools according to their value-added effects on student improvement and the rankings according to the average student achievement, the latter being the method frequently used to assess the performance of the schools in Turkey. Moreover, the results demonstrate that the value-added effects of the schools on student improvement differ drastically from subject to subject. Implications for Research and Practice: It is expected that this research will lead to a more balanced evaluation of schools particularly given the likely emergence of more data over the years. In addition, this is the first value added assessment study carried out in Turkey. It points out that the way Turkish schools are assessed is problematic and suggests that value added methods should be considered in evaluating the effects of schools.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KOÇ, F. (2022). Investigation of School Effects on Student Achievement in Primary Education Using Value-Added Assessment. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 76 - Sayı: 76, 41–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/507169

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Allison, P. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93-114.
  2. Ballou, D., Sanders, W., & Wright, P. (2004). Controlling for student background in value-added assessment of teachers. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29 (1), 37-65.
  3. Başaran, İ., & Çınkır. Ş. (2013). Türkiye Eğitim Sistemi ve okul yönetimi. Ankara:
  4. Ekinoks Yayınları.
  5. Batyra, A. (2017). Gender gaps in student achievement in Turkey. Berberoğlu, G. (2006). Sınıf İçi ölçme değerlendirme teknikleri. İstanbul:
  6. Morpa. Berberoğlu, G., & Kalender, İ. (2005). Öğrenci başarısının, yıllara, okul türlerine, bölgelere göre incelenmesi: ÖSS ve PISA analizi. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, 22, 21-35.
  7. Bryk, A., & Weisberg, H. (1976). Value-added analysis: A dynamic approach to the estimation of treatment effects. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 127-155.
  8. Ciftci, A. (2006). PISA 2003 Matematik alt testi sonuçlarına göre Türkiye’deki öğrencilerin başarılarını etkileyen bazı faktörlerin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi,
  9. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  10. Demir, İ., Kılıç, S., & Depren, Ö. (2009). Factors affecting Turkish students’ achievement in Mathematics. US-China Education Review, 6 (6), 47-53.
  11. EFF. (2008). School directors' handbook. Evergreen Freedom Foundation. Web: http://www.effwa.org/pdfs/Value-Added.pdf adresinden 11 Eylül 2008’de alınmıştır. Ehlert, M., Koedel, C., Parsons, E., & Podgursky, M. (2013). Selecting growth measures for school and teacher evaluations: Should propor- tionality matter? National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, 21, 1–33. [1,5,7] Ellett, C. D., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Teacher evaluation, teacher effectiveness and school effectiveness: Perspectives from the USA. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(1), 101-128.
  12. Everson, K. C. (2017). Value-added modeling and educational accountability: Are we answering the real questions? Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 35-70.
  13. Gray, J., & Jesson, D. (1987). Exam results and local authority league tables. In A. Harrison & J. Gretton (ed.), Examination and training UK, (pp. 33-41).
  14. Gray, J., Jesson, D., & Jones, B. (1984). Predicting differences in examination results between local education authorities: Does school organisation matter?. Oxford Review of Education 10(1) 45-68.
  15. Gray, J., Jesson, D., &Jones, B. (1986). The search for a fairer way of comparing schools’ examination result