Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 75

Effectiveness of Project Based Learning in Statistics for Lower Secondary Schools

Sayfa
197–212
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Alternatively, teachers can use PBL with technology-assisted learning to make learning more interesting for students.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: This study aimed at investigating theeffectiveness of implementing Project Based Learning (PBL) on the topic of statistics at a lower secondary school in Surabaya city, Indonesia, indicated by examining studentlearning outcomes, student responses, and student activity.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Research Methods: A quasi experimental method was conducted over two months involving two classes of seventh gradestudents, consisting an experiment class (PBL)and a control class (conventional learning).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Alternatively, teachers can use PBL with technology-assisted learning to make learning more interesting for students.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed at investigating theeffectiveness of implementing Project Based Learning (PBL) on the topic of statistics at a lower secondary school in Surabaya city, Indonesia, indicated by examining studentlearning outcomes, student responses, and student activity. Research Methods: A quasi experimental method was conducted over two months involving two classes of seventh gradestudents, consisting an experiment class (PBL)and a control class (conventional learning). Datawere collected through student activityobservation sheets, student responses, andpretest-posttests. Data were analyzed byemploying covariance analysis (ANCOVA).Findings: Based on ANCOVA, student learning outcomes in PBL are higher than those inconventional learning. In addition, based on the results of a descriptive analysis, results ofthe student learning outcomes in PBL obtained more than the minimum standard score(MSC), the students’ responses in learning were positive, and the students were active inthe class activities. Thus, PBL is effective in statistical learning. Implications for Researchand Practice: Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that PBL was effectivein statistical learning. These findings suggest that the students were enthusiastic inworking the given project and actively discussed with other students in the class. Wesuggest teachers apply PBL on other mathematics topics so students can be enthusiastic inmathematics learning in the class. Alternatively, teachers can use PBL with technology-assisted learning to make learning more interesting for students.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SISWONO, T. Y. E., HARTONO, S., KOHAR, A. W. (2022). Effectiveness of Project Based Learning in Statistics for Lower Secondary Schools. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 75, 197–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/507164

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Ay, S. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının proje tabanlı öğrenme ve geleneksel öğretime ilişkin görüşleri [Trainee teachers’ views on project-based learning and traditional education]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(1), 53-67.
  2. Barab, S. A., & Luehmann, A. L. (2002). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87, 454– 467. Berends, H., Boersma, K., & Weggeman, M. (2003). The structuration of organizational learning. Human Relations, 56(9), 1035-1056.
  3. Basbay, M. Y. (2010). Proje tabanlı öğrenme [Project based learning]. In Ö. Demirel (Ed.), Eğitimde yeni yönelimler (4. baskı) (pp. 67-80). Ankara:
  4. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Basbay, M., & Ales, A. (2009). The reflections of student teachers on project based learning and investigating self evaluation versus teacher evaluation. Procedia social and Behavioural Sciences, 1, 242-247.
  5. Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3&4), 369-398.
  6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education (5th ed.). UK: Taylor & Francis e-Library. Cronbach, L., J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psyclzometrika, 16, 297-334.
  7. Dede, Y., & Yaman, S. (2003). Fen vema tematik eğitimin deprojeç alışma larını nyeri, önemi vede ğerlen diril mesi [The place, importance and assessment of project work in science and mathematics education]. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 117-132.
  8. Demirhan, C. (2002). Program geliştir mede projet emelli öğren meyaklaşımı [Project basedlearning in program development]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  9. Diffily, D. (2002). Project-based learning: Meeting social studies standards and the needs of gifted learners. Gifted Child Today, 25(3), 40-59.
  10. Eggen, P.D., & Kauchak, D.P. (1998). Strategies for the teacher: Teaching Content and Thinking Skill. Allyn and Bacon: Boston Erdem, E., & Demirel, Ö. (2002). Constructivism in curriculum development. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 81-87.
  11. Garfield, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1988). Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: Implications for research. Journal for research in Mathematics Education, 44-63.
  12. Green, A. M. (1998). Project-based-learning: moving students toward meaningful