Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2018 / Cilt: 74 - Sayı: 74

The Effect of Augmented Reality Applications in the Learning Process: A Meta- Analysis Study

Sayfa
165–186
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

When comparing sample size in the study, it was identified that theeffect size of large sample groups was affected by AR on a medium level, while small sampleswere affected minimally.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: The aim of this research is to investigate theeffect of Augmented Reality (AR) applications in thelearning process.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Research Methods: To determine the effect of AR in the learning process, experimental studies conducted in 2007-2017 on theuse of AR in education were analyzed by the MetaAnalysis Method.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:When comparing sample size in the study, it was identified that theeffect size of large sample groups was affected by AR on a medium level, while small sampleswere affected minimally.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2007-2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this research is to investigate theeffect of Augmented Reality (AR) applications in thelearning process. Problem: Research that determines the effectiveness of Augmented Reality (AR) applications in the learning process with different variables has not been encountered in national or international literature. Research Methods: To determine the effect of AR in the learning process, experimental studies conducted in 2007-2017 on theuse of AR in education were analyzed by the MetaAnalysis Method. Analyzed articles were selected among the publications in the journalsscanned in the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). In this context, 16 studies were examinedto identify the effect of AR applications in the learning process. Findings: Findings indicatedthat AR applications increase students’ academic achievement in the learning processcompared to traditional methods. Implications for Research and Practice: It was concludedthat AR applications do not show significant differences in academic success in the learningprocess. For example, the “grade level” variable of the study does not show a significantdifference compared to traditional methods. When assessing AR display devices, the largesteffect size was related to the use of mobile devices, while the smallest effect size was in the useof webcam-based devices. When comparing sample size in the study, it was identified that theeffect size of large sample groups was affected by AR on a medium level, while small sampleswere affected minimally.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞAHİN, Ç., ARCAGÖK, S., DEMİR, M. K., ÖZDEMİR, M. (2022). The Effect of Augmented Reality Applications in the Learning Process: A Meta- Analysis Study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 74 - Sayı: 74, 165–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/507158

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence (Cambridge, Mass.), 6(4), 355–385.
  2. Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., & Graf, S. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133-149.
  3. Batdı, D. (2014). Etkinlik temelli öğrenme yaklaşımının akademik başarıya etkisi (Metaanalitik ve tematik bir çalışma) [The Effect of Activity-Based Learning Approach on Academic Achievement (A Meta-Analytic and Thematic Study)]. e-International Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 39-55. DOI: 10.19160/e- ijer.12976. Batdı, V. (2015). Kavram haritası tekniği ile geleneksel öğrenme yönteminin kullanılmasının öğrencilerin başarıları, bilgilerinin kalıcılığı ve tutumlarına etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması [The Effect of Using the Concept-Mapping Technique and Traditional Methods on the Achievement, Retention and Attitudes of Students: A Meta-Analytic Study]. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 42(2), 93-102.
  4. Batdı, V. (2017). Eğitlence Uygulamalarının Akademik Başarıya Etkisi: Meta-Analitik Bir Çalışma [The Effect of Edutainment Applications upon Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Study]. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 47–62.
  5. Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrev, I. (2001). The magicbook-moving seamlessly between reality and virtuality. IEEE Computer Graphics and applications, 21(3), 6- 8. Cooper, H. M. (1989). Integrating research. A guide for literature reviews (Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 2). London: Sage Publications. Chang, H. Y., Hsu, Y. S., & Wu, H. K. (2016). A comparison study of augmented reality versus interactive simulation technology to support student learning of a socio- scientific issue. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1148-1161.
  6. Chang, R. C., Chung, L. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2016). Developing an interactive augmented reality system as a complement to plant education and comparing its effectiveness with video learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1245-1264.
  7. Chen, C. M., & Tsai, Y. N. (2012). Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. Computers & Education, 59(2), 638-652.
  8. Chen, C. P., & Wang, C. H. (2015). Employing Augmented-Reality-Embedded Instruction to Disperse the Imparities of Individual Differences in Earth Science Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 835-847
  9. Chiang, T. H., Yang, S. J.