KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 81

Creative Thinking Patterns In Student‘s Scientific Works

Endah Tri PRIYATNI
Alfi SYAHRIN
Heri SUWIGNYO
. DAWUD
Sayfa
21–36
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, for further research it is recommended that we examine creative thinking patterns with different levels of objects so that the findings of this study appear more widely in various levels.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: This study aimed to explain creative thinking patterns, including imaginative thinking, divergent thinking, and lateral thinking of students in scientific work.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Findings: The findings of this study indicated that (1) the pattern of imaginative thinking in student scientific work appeared in the diversity of ideas based on experience and use of metaphorical language.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, for further research it is recommended that we examine creative thinking patterns with different levels of objects so that the findings of this study appear more widely in various levels.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to explain creative thinking patterns, including imaginative thinking, divergent thinking, and lateral thinking of students in scientific work. The scientific work studied was in the form of the Student Creativity Program at Malang State University, Indonesia. Research Methods: This study used a qualitative approach with content analysis method. The data were in the form of sentences, sentence groups, paragraphs, paragraph clusters, and whole text. The data source of this research was the writing of student scientific work. The data were collected through surveys, documentation studies, and interviews. The process of data analysis was grouped into three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. Findings: The findings of this study indicated that (1) the pattern of imaginative thinking in student scientific work appeared in the diversity of ideas based on experience and use of metaphorical language. Ideas were born through simple propositions in paragraph form. (2) Divergent thinking patterns in student scientific work could be seen from the diversity of ideas and techniques for problem solving. Criteria for markers of divergent thinking patterns were characterized by originality, flexibility or elaboration. (3) Lateral thinking patterns in student scientific work could be seen from the use of a variety of unique ideas according to the complexity of problem solving. Implications for Research and Practice: Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that creative thinking patterns of students in scientific work showed the use of various forms of ideas in accordance with the complexity of problem solving. The findings of this study contribute to our understanding of the importance of using creative thinking patterns in scientific writing. However, for further research it is recommended that we examine creative thinking patterns with different levels of objects so that the findings of this study appear more widely in various levels.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

PRIYATNI, E. T., SYAHRIN, A., SUWIGNYO, H., DAWUD, .. (2022). Creative Thinking Patterns In Student‘s Scientific Works. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 81, 21–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/507135

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Adair, J. (2007). The art of creative thinking: How to be innovative and develop great ideas. London: Great Britain. Arsad, N., Sanusi, H., Majid, R. A., Ali, M. M., & Husain, H. (2012). Lateral thinking through black box experiment among engineering students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.340 Batey, dkk. (2009). Intelligence and personality as predictors of divergent thinking: The role of general, fluid and crystallised intelligence. Journal Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 60–69.
  2. Chan, Z. C. Y. (2016). Student peer reviewers’ views on teaching innovations and imaginative learning. Nurse Education Today, 39, 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.02.004
  3. Djojosuroto, K. (2007). Filsafat bahasa. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Book Publisher. de Bono, E. (1970). Lateral thinking. New York: Harper & Row. Hidayat, T., Susilaningsih, E., & Kurniawan, C. (2018). The effectiveness of enrichment test instruments design to measure students’ creative thinking skills and problem-solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.011
  4. Kusmana, S. (2012). Merancang karya tulis ilmiah. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Leonhardy. (1962). Introductory college mathematic. New York: John Wiley & Sans. Lengelle, R., Meijers, F., Poell, R., & Post, M. (2013). The effects of creative, expressive, and reflective writing on career learning: An explorative study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.06.014
  5. Lewis, C., & Lovatt, P. J. (2013). Breaking away from set patterns of thinking: Improvisation and divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.03.001
  6. Liu, W., Pan, Y., Luo, X., Wang, L., & Pang, W. (2017). Active procrastination and creative ideation: The mediating role of creative self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 227–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.033
  7. Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). The new taxonomy of educational objectives. London: Corwin Press.
  8. Munandar, U. (2004). Pengembangan kreativitas anak berbakat. Jakarta: Gramedia. Paul, R., & Linda, E. (2008). Critical and creative thinking. Dillon Beach: Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.
  9. Poespoprodjo, W., & Gilarso, E. T. (2017). Logika ilmu menalar: dasar-dasar berpikir tertib, logis, kritis, analitis, dan dialektis. Bandung: Pustaka Grafika. Rawlinson, J. G. (1981). Creative thinking