Therefore, future studies might focus on other individual and organizational factors related to the teacher's voice.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the level of the teacher's voice, and to examine the relationships between voice, five-factor personalitytraits and psychological safety.Research Method: The study was conducted with a correlational survey model.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The sample of the study consisted of 475 teachers in public primary schools.Three instruments were applied in the study; Employee Voice Scale, Quick Big Five Personality Test, and Psychological Safety Scale.Findings: Results showed that the level of teacher's voice was at level “Often”, and there were significant and positive correlations between agreeableness extraversion, emotional stability and openness to experience, and teacher's voice; and also between psychological safety and teacher's voice; and lastly, between psychological safety and agreeableness and emotional stability.Implications for Research and Practice: Significant and positive relationships were found between teacher voice, and psychological safety and personality while the strength of the relationships was low.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore, future studies might focus on other individual and organizational factors related to the teacher's voice.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the level of the teacher's voice, and to examine the relationships between voice, five-factor personalitytraits and psychological safety.Research Method: The study was conducted with a correlational survey model. The sample of the study consisted of 475 teachers in public primary schools.Three instruments were applied in the study; Employee Voice Scale, Quick Big Five Personality Test, and Psychological Safety Scale.Findings: Results showed that the level of teacher's voice was at level “Often”, and there were significant and positive correlations between agreeableness extraversion, emotional stability and openness to experience, and teacher's voice; and also between psychological safety and teacher's voice; and lastly, between psychological safety and agreeableness and emotional stability.Implications for Research and Practice: Significant and positive relationships were found between teacher voice, and psychological safety and personality while the strength of the relationships was low. Therefore, future studies might focus on other individual and organizational factors related to the teacher's voice.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
TABANCALI, E., BAS, S. (2022). Correlations between Teachers’ Personality, Psychological Safety Perception and Teacher Voice. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 85, 185–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/507104
Ashford, J. B., & LeCroy, C. (2009). Human behavior in the social environment: A Multidimensional Perspective. Toronto: Nelson Education. Bulut H., & Bayramlik H. (2015). The analysis of employee voice behaviour of teachers: A study in Balikesir state schools. Paper presented at II. Yuksekogretim Stratejileri ve Kurumsal İsbirligi Sempozyumu (YOSKIS) (444-449). Mersin: Mersin University. Buyukgoze, H. (2015). A comparison of the employment of public sector teachers in EU and Turkey. Journal of Aksaray University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 7(2), 57-65.
Buyukozturk, S., Kilic Cakmak, E., Akgun, E.A., Karadeniz S., & Demirel, F. (2012). Scientific Research Methods (11th edition). Ankara:
Pegem Publication. Cetin, S., & Cakmakci, C. (2012). Adaptation of the employee voice scale into Turkish. Science Journal of Turkish Military Academy, 22(2), 1-19.
Cetin, S. (2013). Impact of teachers’ perceptions of organizational support, management openness and personality traits on voice. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(18), 1709-1721.
Cheng, J., Chang, S. C., Kuo, J. H., & Lu, K. M. (2014). Social relations and voice behavior: The mediating role of psychological safety. Criticism, 32, 58. Cingi, H. (2009). Ornekleme Kurami (3rd ed.). Ankara: Bizim Buro Basimevi Yayin Dag. Tic. Ltd. Sirketi. Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2003). Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8(4), 247-265.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Arastirma deseni, nitel, nicel ve karma yontem yaklasimlari (2nd ed.) (S.B. Demir Trans.). [Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.]. Ankara:
Egiten Kitap Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Latent voice episodes: The situation-specific nature of speaking up at work. Harvard Business School Working Paper, 6-24.
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
Dundar, T., & Tabancali, E. (2012). The relationship between organizational justice perceptions and job satisfaction levels. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5777-5781.
Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., Lawrence, K. A., & Miner-Rubino, K. (2002). Red light, green light: Making sense of the organizational context for issue selling. Organization Science, 13(4), 355-369.
Edmondson, A., & Mogelof, J. P. (2005). Explaining psychological safety