KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2015 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Language Learning Aptitude (LLA) and Language Learning Strategy (LLS) use among Iranian university EFL students: Patterns and relationships

Karim SADEGHİ
Sayfa
77–96
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Fundamental to any consideration of research into students’ roles in any educational program is the focus on the most efficient way(s) of learning for students.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Following the same thread, this study aimed to explore the patterns of language learning strategy (LLS) use (based on Oxford’s SILL, 1990a) and its links with language learning aptitude (LLA) (as measured by Carroll and Sapon’s MLAT, 1983) of a cohort of male (N = 16) and female (N = 32) Iranian students at Urmia University.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Fundamental to any consideration of research into students’ roles in any educational program is the focus on the most efficient way(s) of learning for students. Following the same thread, this study aimed to explore the patterns of language learning strategy (LLS) use (based on Oxford’s SILL, 1990a) and its links with language learning aptitude (LLA) (as measured by Carroll and Sapon’s MLAT, 1983) of a cohort of male (N = 16) and female (N = 32) Iranian students at Urmia University. One-way ANOVA indicated significant differences between the two genders on their use of cognitive and metacognitive LLSs in favor of males but not on their aptitude scores. Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant role for aptitude level but not gender on students’ language learning strategy use. Pearson product-moment correlation also revealed significant relationships among the components of MLAT and LLSs. Detailed findings and discussions are presented in the paper. © 2015 EJAL & the Authors. Published by EJAL. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SADEGHİ, K. (2022). Language Learning Aptitude (LLA) and Language Learning Strategy (LLS) use among Iranian university EFL students: Patterns and relationships. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 77–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/507084

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Abraham, R. G., Vann, R. J. (1987). Strategies of two language learners. In A. Wenden J. Rubin (Eds), Learners strategies in language learning (pp. 85-102). Cambridge: Prentice Hall. Bidabadi, F. S., Yamat, H. (2011). The relationship between listening strategies used by Iranian EFL freshman university students and their listening proficiency levels. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 26-32. http://doi.org/vsm
  2. Carpenter, H. (2009). behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of different aptitudes for L2 grammar in learners equated for proficiency level. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 69, 12 4602. (Accession No. 200920807). Carroll, J. B., Sapon, S. M. (1983). Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT): Manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation Harcourt Brace ovanovich. Carroll, J. B. (1962). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. Pittsburgh, PA: Training Research and Education, University of Pittsburgh Press.
  3. Carroll, J. B. (1963). Programmed self-instruction in Mandarin Chinese: Observations of student progress with an automated audio-visual instructional device. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Carroll, J. B. (1966). parametric study of language training in the Peace Corps. Cambridge, MA: Laboratory for Research in Instruction, Graduate School of Education, Harvard University Press.
  5. Carroll, J. B. (1990). Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. In T. S. Parry C. W. Stansfield (Eds), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 11—29). Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall Regents. Chamot, A. U., O’Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive language learning approach. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley. Chamot, A. U. (1987). Inferencing: Testing the “hypothesistesting” hypothesis. In A. Wenden J. Rubin (Eds), Learner strategy in language learning (pp. 71-83). Cambridge: Prentice Hall. Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14-26.
  6. Chamot, A. U., Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annuals, 22(1), 13-24. http://doi.org/bfppjp
  7. Chang, H-H. (2005). The relationship between extrinsic/intrinsic motivation and language learning strategies among college students of English in Taiwan. Master’s thesis, Ming Chuan University, Taiwan. Cohen, A.D. (1998). Strategies