KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2016 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Are EFL Learners and Teachers in the Same Camp? A Study on Form-focused Instruction

Ümran ÜSTÜNBAŞ
Sayfa
65–77
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings also revealed that language proficiency did not play a significant role in EFL learners’ preferences of integrated and isolated form-focused instruction.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study reports on findings of a replication study of Valeo and Spada (2015) that investigated the timing of grammar instruction.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this respect, the frequently discussed issue of isolated and integrated form-focused instruction was reconsidered based on the beliefs of main stakeholders, teachers and learners.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings also revealed that language proficiency did not play a significant role in EFL learners’ preferences of integrated and isolated form-focused instruction.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study reports on findings of a replication study of Valeo and Spada (2015) that investigated the timing of grammar instruction. In this respect, the frequently discussed issue of isolated and integrated form-focused instruction was reconsidered based on the beliefs of main stakeholders, teachers and learners. In order to collect data, two questionnaires consisting of 5-point Likert-scale items developed by Valeo and Spada (2015) were administered to 651 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners with different language proficiency levels and 42 instructors teaching English to them at a state university in Turkey. The analyses of the questionnaires indicated that both EFL learners and teachers were in the same camp and they preferred integrated form-focused instruction rather than the isolated one while they did not disregard the importance of the isolated form-focused instruction. The findings also revealed that language proficiency did not play a significant role in EFL learners’ preferences of integrated and isolated form-focused instruction.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÜSTÜNBAŞ, Ü. (2022). Are EFL Learners and Teachers in the Same Camp? A Study on Form-focused Instruction. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 65–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/507075

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Ansarin, A. A., Abad, B. A. A., & Khojasteh, M. R. B. (2015). Isolated and integrated form focused instruction from learners’ perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2), 299-307. http://doi.org/bnk7
  2. Borg, S. (2003b). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on whatlanguage teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109. http://doi.org/cststj
  3. Borg, S., & Burns, A. (2008). Integrating grammar in adult TESOL classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 29, 456–482. http://doi.org/cshjr5
  4. Brown, A. V. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. Modern Language Journal, 93, 46–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540- 4781.2009.00827.x. Burgess, J., & Etherington, S. (2002). Focus on grammatical form: Explicit or implicit? System, 30, 433–458. http://doi.org/cvt54c
  5. DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348).
  6. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.197–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Elgun-Gunduz, Z., Akcan, S., & Bayyurt, Y. (2012). Isolated form-focused instruction and grammatical form: Explicit school English classrooms in Turkey. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 25(2), 157–171. http://doi.org/bnk8
  8. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 83–107. http://doi.org/d447kq
  10. Ellis, R. (2008). Learner beliefs and language learning. Asian EFL Journal, 10(4), 7-25.
  11. Hulstijn, J. (2003). Incidental and intentional learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 349–382).
  12. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Kartchava, E., & Ammar, A. (2014). Learners’ beliefs as mediators of what is noticed and learned in the language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 86–109. http://doi.org/bnk9
  13. Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasas, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009). Second language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. Modern Language Journal, 93, 91–104. http://doi.org/dxqsdj
  14. Peacock, M. (1999). Beliefs about language learning and their relationship to proficiency. International Journal of Applied Lingu