KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Tracing the Changes in Reading Scores and Learning Style Preferences through Reading Strategy Training

Şevki KÖMÜR
Mehmet ABİ
Sayfa
213–237
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This is an open-accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aimed at investigating possible effects of reading strategy instruction on students’ languagelearning style preferences and their reading proficiency levels.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 62 11th grade students from threedifferent classes (one treatment and two control groups) of a Turkish high school took part in thisexperimental study which lasted for eight weeks.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This is an open-accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2005 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study aimed at investigating possible effects of reading strategy instruction on students’ languagelearning style preferences and their reading proficiency levels. A total of 62 11th grade students from threedifferent classes (one treatment and two control groups) of a Turkish high school took part in thisexperimental study which lasted for eight weeks. In the scope of this study, Learning Style Survey (LSS)developed by Cohen, Oxford and Chi (2005), Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) by Mokhtari and Sheorey(2002) and Key English Test (KET) were applied to the target groups both before and after reading strategyinstruction. The data obtained from these three instruments were compared. Results demonstrated thatreading strategy training may have an effect on students’ language learning style preferences, possiblyleading students to be more synthesizing and field dependent.© 2018 EJAL & the Authors. Published by Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics (EJAL). This is an open-accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KÖMÜR, Ş., ABİ, M. (2022). Tracing the Changes in Reading Scores and Learning Style Preferences through Reading Strategy Training. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 213–237. https://ajindex.com/articles/507041

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Alharbi, M. A. (2015). Reading strategies, learning styles and reading comprehension: A correlation study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(6), 1257-1268.
  2. Anderson, N. J. (2008). Metacognition and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 99-109).
  3. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Black, K. (2010). Business statistics: Contemporary decision making (6th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463-494.
  5. Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education. Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education. Carrell, P. L. (1985). Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 727-752.
  6. Carrell, L. P., Pharis, G. B., & Liberto, C. J. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 647-678.
  7. Chamot, A. U. (2008). Strategy instruction and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 266-281).
  8. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Chamot, A. U., Anstrom, K., Bartoshesly, A., Belanger, A., Delett, J., Karwan, V., & Keatley, C. (2003). The elementary immersion learning strategies resource guide. Retrieved from www.ncrlc.org/eils/ Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P. B., & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman. Cohen, A. D. (2003). The learners' side of foreign language learning: Where do styles, strategies, and tasks meet? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(4), 279-291.
  10. Cohen, A. D. (2010). Focus on the language learner styles, strategies and motivation. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 161-178).
  11. London, UK: Hodder Education. Cohen, A. D., Oxford, R. L., & Chi, J. C. (2005). Learning style survey for young learners: Assesing your own learning styles. Retrieved from http://www.carla.umn.edu/about/profi les/Cohen.html Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London, UK: Longman. Cohen, A. D. (2007). Coming to terms with language learner strategies: Surveying the experts. In A. D. Cohen, & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp. 29-46).
  12. New York, NY: Oxford Uni