Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Using Humor in Language Classrooms: Greasing the Wheels or Putting a Spanner in the Works? A Study on Humor Styles of Turkish EFL Instructors

Sayfa
23–39
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This is an open-accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Humor has often been seen as an important element in the learning process, facilitating both teachingand learning.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:However, the one identified byMartin et al. (2003) attempts to deal with the functions of humor, rather than particular personalities itmay or may not represent.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This is an open-accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2003 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Humor has often been seen as an important element in the learning process, facilitating both teachingand learning. Nevertheless, the utilization of humor in the educational setting has had its opponents. Inrecent years, many attempts have been made to conceptualize the various forms of humor implementedin the practice of education. Despite a myriad of studies aimed at linking humor with personality traits,there seem a dearth number of research studies addressing the multifaceted humor styles of EFLinstructors while interacting with the students in the classroom. There have been a number of scalesthought-up in order to best assess the humor styles of the individual. However, the one identified byMartin et al. (2003) attempts to deal with the functions of humor, rather than particular personalities itmay or may not represent. The four specific humor styles identified in this scale encompass two benign(affiliative and self-enhancing), and two injurious (aggressive and self-defeating) humor styles. Thepresent study seeks to examine the humor styles adopted by English language instructors in Turkey byinvestigating (1) whether there is a difference between male and female instructors with regard toemploying humor, (2) whether the educational level of the participants influences their tendency to usehumor while interacting with the students in the classroom, and (3) whether the age of the instructors isan influential factor in adopting various styles of humor. A total of 64 English language instructorsworking at private and state universities in Turkey completed a standardized form of the Humor StylesQuestionnaire (HSQ) online. Results indicated no significant difference between male and femaleinstructors with regard to adopting humor styles in the classroom. Nor were there any differencesbetween instructors of varying educational level in terms of the use of humor styles. In addition, nodifferences were seen according to age.© 2019 EJAL & the Authors. Published by Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics (EJAL). This is an open-accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-NC-ND)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ANDARAB, M. S., MUTLU, A. K. (2022). Using Humor in Language Classrooms: Greasing the Wheels or Putting a Spanner in the Works? A Study on Humor Styles of Turkish EFL Instructors. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 23–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/507015

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Abraham, R. R., Hande, V., Sharma, M. E. J., Wohlrath, S. K., Keet, C. C., & Ravi, S. (2014). Use of humour in classroom teaching: Students’ perspectives. Thrita, 3(2), 1–4.
  2. Agcam, R. (2017). Investigating instructors’ perceptions on the use of humour in higher education. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(2), 238–248.
  3. Altinkurt, Y., & Yilmaz, K. (2011). Humor styles of primary school teachers. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 1(2), 1–8.
  4. Askildson, L. (2005). Effects of humor in the language classroom: Humor as a pedagogical tool in theory and practice. Arizona Working Papers in SLAT, 12, 45–61.
  5. Aydin, A. (2015). Identifying the relationship of teacher candidates’ humor styles with anxiety and self-compassion levels. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 59, 1–16.
  6. Berk, R. (1998). Professors are from mars, students are from snickers: How to write and deliver humor in the classroom and in professional presentations. Madison, WI: Magna Publications. Bilge, F., & Saltuk, S. (2007).
  7. Humor Styles, Subjective Well-beings, Trait Anger and Anxiety among University Students in Turkey. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2(5), 464–469.
  8. Cecen, R. (2007). Humor styles in predicting loneliness among Turkish university students. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(6), 835–844.
  9. Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Dyck, K. T., & Holtzman, S. (2013). Understanding humor styles and well-being: The importance of social relationships and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 53–58.
  11. Ford, T. E., McCreight, K. A., & Richardson, K. (2014). Affective style, humor styles, and happiness. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 10, 451–463.
  12. Garner, R. (2003). Which came first, the chicken or the egg? A foul metaphor for teaching. Radical Pedagogy, 5(2), 205–212.
  13. Garner, R. (2005).
  14. Humor, Analogy, and Metaphor: H.A.M. it up in Teaching. Radical Pedagogy, 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.radicalpedagogy.org/radicalpedagogy /Humor,_ Analogy,_and_Metaphor__H.A.M._it_up_in_Teaching.html Garner, R. (2006). Humor in pedagogy: How ha-ha can lead to aha! College Teaching, 54(1), 177–180.
  15. Gonzalez, G. (2014). Ten ways to sabotage your classroom management. Retrieved from https://www.middleweb.com /19037/10-ways-sabotage-classroom-management/ Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. (4th ed.). Essex: Longman. Huy Hoang, P., & Petraki, E. (2016). Do Asia