KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Using Contrastive Terminology Analysis in Teaching a Foreign Language

Chunxiang Wu
Jennifer Baccanello
Sayfa
461–471
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We hope that the theoretical frameworkpresented in this paper will be of use to teachers of Chinese for Special Purposes.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study focuses on teaching Chinese for Special Purposes (CSP) and explores how terminology used inChinese commercial contracts can be taught using a contrastive terminology analysis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Secondly, we describe the method of contrastive semantic analysis and show how it can bepaired with corpus linguistics in order to help L2 Chinese learners acquire vocabulary used in BusinessChinese, focusing specifically on Chinese commercial contracts.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We hope that the theoretical frameworkpresented in this paper will be of use to teachers of Chinese for Special Purposes.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study focuses on teaching Chinese for Special Purposes (CSP) and explores how terminology used inChinese commercial contracts can be taught using a contrastive terminology analysis. Firstly, we outlinethe contextual differences that exist between commercial contracts drafted in Chinese and those draftedin English. Secondly, we describe the method of contrastive semantic analysis and show how it can bepaired with corpus linguistics in order to help L2 Chinese learners acquire vocabulary used in BusinessChinese, focusing specifically on Chinese commercial contracts. Thirdly, we shall explore the semanticequivalence between lexical items of different languages. Lastly, we present a semantic analysis ofterminology found in Chinese and English commercial contracts. We hope that the theoretical frameworkpresented in this paper will be of use to teachers of Chinese for Special Purposes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Wu, C., Baccanello, J. (2022). Using Contrastive Terminology Analysis in Teaching a Foreign Language. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 461–471. https://ajindex.com/articles/507014

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Adams, J. P. (2009). The Roman Concept of Fides. Retrieved from http://www.csun.edu/~hcfll004/fides.html
  2. Aston, G. (Ed.). (2001). Learning with corpora. Houston: Athelstan. Bennet, G. (2010). Using corpora in the language learning classroom: Corpus linguistics for teachers. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
  3. Breeze, R. (2017). Corpora and computation in teaching law and language. International Journal of Language & Law, 6, 1-17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14762/jll.2017.001
  4. Cao, D. (2016). Chinese law: a language perspective. New York: Routledge. Cheng, L. & Sin, K. (2008). Terminological equivalence in legal translation: A semiotic approach. Semiotica, 172, 33-45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2008.088
  5. Dubroff, H. (2006). The implied covenant of good faith in contract interpretation and gapfilling: Reviling a revered relic. St. John’s Law Review, 80(2), 559-620. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=120 0&context=lawreview Elliott, C. & Quinn, F. (2009). Contract Law (7th ed.). UK: Pearson Education Limited. Garside, K. J., Pigott, A. R., & Bates, J. (2018). UK: The Basics: The Current Position On Good Faith. Retrieved from http://www.mondaq.com/uk/x/709832/Contract+Law/The+Basics+The+current+position+on +good+faith Hafner, C. A., & Candlin, C. N. (2007). Corpus tools as an affordance to learning in professional legal education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(4), 303-318.
  6. Johns, T., & King, P. (Eds.). (1991). Classroom concordancing. Birmingham: University of Birmingham. Juodinytė-Kuznetsova, K. (2015). Contrastive semantic analysis of contract law terms in studies of foreign language for specific purposes. Sustainable Multilingualism, 7, 58-72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7220/2335-2027.7.3
  7. Kocbek, A. (2006). Language and culture in international legal communication. Managing Global Transitions, 4(3), 231-247. Retrieved from http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISSN/1581- 6311/4_231- 247.pdf. Makino, S. (1974). Contrastive semantic analysis and teaching Japanese. The Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese, 9(1), 21-34.
  8. Mattila, H.E.S. (2006). Comparative legal linguistics. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Matulewska, A. (2016). Semantic relations between legal terms: A case study of the intralingual relation of synonymy. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 45(1), 161-174. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0022
  9. McEnery, T., & Xiao, R. (2010). What corpo