Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

The Role of Psychological Capital in Language Learners’ Willingness to Communicate, Motivation, and Achievement

Sayfa
495–513
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on the findings, some recommendations were presented on how to apply PsyCap to therealm of language education.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:By shifting the focus of studies in applied linguistics from negative psychology to positive psychology,psychological capital (PsyCap) consisting of self-efficacy, hope, optimism, and resilience can be aninfluential factor in the language classrooms.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Therefore, to address this gap,this research intends to assess the role of PsyCap in learners’ second/foreign (L2) willingness tocommunicate (WTC), L2 motivational self system, and L2 achievement.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on the findings, some recommendations were presented on how to apply PsyCap to therealm of language education.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

By shifting the focus of studies in applied linguistics from negative psychology to positive psychology,psychological capital (PsyCap) consisting of self-efficacy, hope, optimism, and resilience can be aninfluential factor in the language classrooms. Prior studies have emphasized the role that PsyCap playsin management, though little attention has been given to it in education. Therefore, to address this gap,this research intends to assess the role of PsyCap in learners’ second/foreign (L2) willingness tocommunicate (WTC), L2 motivational self system, and L2 achievement. To achieve this goal, 317 IranianEnglish as a foreign language (EFL) learners took part in the present study and completed the measuresof PsyCap, L2 WTC, and L2 motivational self system. The findings of structural equation modelingdemonstrated that the learners’ PsyCap was a positive significant predictor of L2 WTC, L2 motivationalself system, and L2 achievement. These findings confirm the influential role of PsyCap in languageeducation. Based on the findings, some recommendations were presented on how to apply PsyCap to therealm of language education.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Khajavy, G. H., Makiabadi, H., Navokhi, S. A. (2022). The Role of Psychological Capital in Language Learners’ Willingness to Communicate, Motivation, and Achievement. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 495–513. https://ajindex.com/articles/507002

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2010). The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management, 36, 430–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308329961
  2. Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20070
  3. Bergheim, K., Nielsen, M. B., Mearns, K., & Eid, J. (2015). The relationship between psychological capital, job satisfaction, and safety perceptions in the maritime industry. Safety Science, 74, 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.024
  4. Burgoon, J. K. (1976). The unwillingness-to-communicate scale: Development and validation. Communication Monographs, 43, 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757609375916 Carmona–Halty, M., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2019). How psychological capital mediates between study–related positive emotions and academic performance. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(2), 605-617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9963-5
  5. Carver, C. S., & Scheiver, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174794
  6. Çavuş, M. F., & Gökçen, A. (2015). Psychological capital: definition, components, and effects. British Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 5(3), 244-255. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2015/12574
  7. Çetinkaya, Y. B. (2005). Turkish college students’ willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Charos, C. (1994). Personality and individual differences as predictors of second language communication: A causal analysis. (Unpublished honors thesis). University of Ottawa, Canada. Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Language learners’ motivational profiles and their motivated learning behavior. Language Learning, 55(4), 613-659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023- 8333.2005.00319.x Datu, J. A. D., King, R. B., & Valdez, J. P. M. (2018). Psychological capital bolsters motivation, engagement, and achievement: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(3), 260-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1257056
  8. Datu, J. A. D., & Valdez, J. P. M. (2016). Psychological capital predicts academic engagement and well-being in Fili