KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 2

Erozyon Araştırmalarında Kullanılan Veejet Tipi Memelerin Yağış Yoğunluğu ve Christiansen Eş Su Dağılım Katsayısına Etkileri Üzerine Bir Çalışma

A Study on the Effects of Veejet Nozzles used in Erosion Researches on Rain Intensity and Christiansen’s Uniformity Coefficient

Gökçen YÖNTER
Sayfa
195–202
Yayın Tarihi
2016-06-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Christiansen’s uniformity coefficients were found between 59.85 to 86.68 % in this study.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was conducted to compare with rain intensities and Christiansen’s uniformity coefficients were taken from Veejet spraying nozzles (80070, 80100 and 80150) by using a laboratory type rain simulator under different pressures (10, 20, 30 and 40 kPa).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results showed that rain intensities and Christiansen’s uniformity coefficients increased at Veejet 80070 and 80100 types spraying nozzles, based on increasing pressures.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Christiansen’s uniformity coefficients were found between 59.85 to 86.68 % in this study.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Yapay yağmurlayıcı · yağış yoğunluğu · Christiansen eş su dağılım katsayısı

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare with rain intensities and Christiansen’s uniformity coefficients were taken from Veejet spraying nozzles (80070, 80100 and 80150) by using a laboratory type rain simulator under different pressures (10, 20, 30 and 40 kPa). Results showed that rain intensities and Christiansen’s uniformity coefficients increased at Veejet 80070 and 80100 types spraying nozzles, based on increasing pressures. But, it was found that 30 and 40 kPa pressures effected at Veejet 80150 types spraying nozzle. Christiansen’s uniformity coefficients were found between 59.85 to 86.68 % in this study.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YÖNTER, G. (2016). Erozyon Araştırmalarında Kullanılan Veejet Tipi Memelerin Yağış Yoğunluğu ve Christiansen Eş Su Dağılım Katsayısına Etkileri Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 2, 195–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/50398

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Alves Sobrinho, T., H. Gomez Macpherson and J.A. Gomez. 2008. A portable integrated rainfall and overland plow simulator. Soil Use and Management, 24: 163-170.
  2. Anderson, J.U., A.E. Stewart and P.C. Gregory. 1968. A portable rainfall simulator and runoff sampler. New Mexico State University of Agriculture Experiment Station Research, reprinted no: 143. Anonymous, 1999. SPSS 9 for Windows User’s Guide. Copyright 1999 by SPSS Incoorparation SPSS, Chicago, IL. Beasley, D.B., E.J. Monke, E.R. Miller and L.F. Huggins. 1985. Using simulation to assess the impact of conservation tillage on movement of sediment and phosphorus into Lake Erie. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 40: 233-237.
  3. Bubenzer, G.D. and L.D. Meyer. 1965. Simulation of rainfall and soils for laboratory research. Transaction of American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 8: 73-75p. Bubenzer, G.D and B.A. Jones. 1971. Drop size and impact velocity effects on the detachment of soils under rainfall simulation. Transaction of American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 14: 625-628.
  4. Christiansen, J.E. 1942. Irrigation by sprinkling. University of California Agricultural Experiment Station Bulltenin No: 670. Corona, R., T. Wilson, L. ProD’Adderio, F. Poncu, N. Montaldo and J. Albertson. 2013. On the estimation of surface runoff through a new plot scale rainfall simulator in Sardinia, Italy. International Conference on Four Decades of Progress in Monitoring and Modelling of Processes in the Soil-Plant- Atmosphere System Location Naples, Italy, June 19-21, 2013, Procedra Environmental Sciences, (Edt: Romaro, N., Durso, G., Severno, G.)19: 875-884.
  5. Erpul, G. and M. Çanga. 2000. Toprak erozyon çalışmaları için bir yapay yağmurlama aletinin tasarım prensibleri ve yapay yağış karakteristikleri. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1): 75-83.
  6. Esteves, M., O. Planchon, J.M. Lapetite, N. Silvera and P. Cadet. 2000. The ”EMIRE” large rainfall simulator: Design and Field Testing. Earth Surface Processes and Landsforms, 25: 681-690.
  7. Gabric, O., D. Prodanovic and J. Plavsic. 2015. The effects of oscilating nozzle on Cristiansen’s uniformitiy coefficient. Technical Gazette, 22(6): 1415-1418.
  8. Humphry, J.B., T.C. Daniel, D.R. Edwards and A.N. Sharpley. 2002. A portable rainfall simulator for plot-scale runoff studies. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 18(2): 199-204.
  9. Iserloh, T., J.B. Ries, J. Arnaez, C. Boix-Fayos, V. Butzen, A. Cerda, M.T. Echeverria, J. Fernandez Galvez, W. Fister, C. Geibler, J.A. Gomez, H. Gomez Macpher