Dergiler / Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Ağır Çekim (Araba) Atlarının Alt Ekstremite ve Ayak Bölgesi Kemik Lezyonlarının Klinik ve Radyolojik Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of the Bone Lesions in Lower Extremity and Foot Region in Draft Horses

Sayfa
30–36
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Atlarda kemik lezyonlarının belirlenmesinde radyografi sık kullanılan görüntüleme yöntemlerinden birisidir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Atlarda kemik lezyonlarının belirlenmesinde radyografi sık kullanılan görüntüleme yöntemlerinden birisidir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Atlarda kemik lezyonlarının belirlenmesinde radyografi sık kullanılan görüntüleme yöntemlerinden birisidir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Atlarda kemik lezyonlarının belirlenmesinde radyografi sık kullanılan görüntüleme yöntemlerinden birisidir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:alt ekstremite · kemik lezyonu · radyografi

Özet

Atlarda kemik lezyonlarının belirlenmesinde radyografi sık kullanılan görüntüleme yöntemlerinden birisidir. Çalışmada,

Abstract

In this study; it is aimed to discuss the results, which are obtained from the evaluation of the lower extremityand foot region bone lesions in the horses, which are used in various qualities like cargo transportation and transportation,in the light of the literature. Radiography is one of the commonly used imaging techniques for diagnosis of bonelesions in horses. The radiography is one of the most commonly used imaging methods to determin bone lesions inhorses. In this study, we used 30 horses that work as an draft horses. After clinical examination and anamnesis of horses,radiographic exposures were made. All horses were taken x-ray for distal exstremities. Radiographic images wereanalyzed separately for each horses and all lesions were classified for localization and propert. All data were evaluatedby descriptive statistics. After radiological examination, we observed that 80% percent of horses had different lesionshowever, we did not observe any lesion for 20% percent of horses. 66.7% percent of horses had osteoarthritis,70.8% percent of horses had splint 50% percent of horse had sesamoiditis, 54.1% percent of horses had periostealbone formation. The distribution of the lesions in the front and hind extremity respectively, 12.5% and 8.3%. 79.2%percent of lesion were determined both front and hind extremity in our horses. Almost all lesions that were determinedwas chronic lesions. Challenges of working and living conditions was found to be effective for lesion procedure. As aresult, it has been understood all those welfare problems of heavy-duty horses need to be dealt.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EROL, M., GÖKŞAHİN, E., İZCİ, C. (2022). Ağır Çekim (Araba) Atlarının Alt Ekstremite ve Ayak Bölgesi Kemik Lezyonlarının Klinik ve Radyolojik Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 30–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/503795

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Adams OR. Lameness in Horses, Third Edition. Philadelphia: Lea Febiger, 1974; pp. 274-359
  2. Auer JA, Von Rechenberg B. Treatment of angular limb deformities in foals. Clin Tech Equine Pract 2006; 5: 270-81
  3. Balch O, White K, Butler D, Metcalf S. Hoof balance and lameness: Improper toe length, hoof angle and mediolateral balance. Comp Cont Educ Pract 1995; 17: 1275-83
  4. Baxter GM, Laskey RE, Tackett RL. In vitro reactivity of digital arteries and veins to vasoconstrictive mediators in healthy horses and in horses with early laminitis. Am J Vet Res 1989; 50(4): 508-17
  5. Byam-Cook KL, Singer ER. Is there a relationship between clinical presentation, diagnostic and radiographic findings and outcome in horses with osteoarthritis of the small tarsal joints? Equine Vet J 2009; 41(2): 118-23
  6. Caudron I, Grulke S, Miesen M, Vanschepdael P, Serteyn D. Clinical and radiographic assessment of equine. J Equine Vet Sci 1997; 17: 375-9
  7. Chaffin MK, Carter GK, Sustire D. Management of a keratoma in a horse: A case report. J Equine Vet Sci 1989; 323-6
  8. Chateau H, Degueurce C, Jerbı H, Crevıer-Denoıx N, Pourcelot P, Audıgıé F, Pasquı-Boutard V, Denoıx JM. Three-dimensional kinematicsof the equine interphalangeal joints: articular impact of asymmetric bearing. Vet Res 2002; 33(4): 371-82
  9. Colles CM, Hickman J. The arterial supply of the navicular bone and its variations in navicular disease. Equine Vet J 1997; 25: 150-4
  10. Colles CM. Navicular disease and its treatment. In Practice 1982; 4: 29-35
  11. Denoix JM. The Equine Distal Limb: Atlas of Clinical Anatomy and Comparative Imaging. London, UK: Manson Publishing, 2000; p.103
  12. Hardy J. Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of septic arthritis, osteitis, and osteomyelitis in foals. Clin Tech Equine Pract 2006; 5(4): 309-17
  13. Johnson JH. The foot. Mansmann RA, McAllister ES. eds. In: Equine Medecine and Surgery. Third Edition. Santa Barbara, CA: American Veteinary Publications, 1982; p.1039-52
  14. Ley CJ, Ekman S, Dahlberg LE, Björnsdóttir S, Hansson K. Evaluation of osteochondral sample collection guided by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for early detection of osteoarthritis in centrodistal joints of young Icelandic horses. Am J Vet Res 2013; 74(6): 874-87
  15. McIlwraith CW, Frisbie DD, Kawcak CE. The horse as a model of naturally occurring osteoarthritis. Bone Joint Res 2012; 1(11): 297-309
  16. McKnight AL. Digital radiography in equine practice. Clin Tech Equine Pract 2