KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 5

Associated Factors Causing Uterine Prolapsein Nongeriatric and Geriatric Female PatientPopulations and Analysis of Pathological Diagnoses

Esra TAMBURACI
Sayfa
443–448
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Although no significant correla tion was found between age at menopause and the number of births in patients aged

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Many factors influence the etiology of uterine prolapse (UP).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: The 494 patients included in the study were divided into two groups: 317 nongeriatric patients(aged 3 (area under the curve [AUC]=0.553; 95% CI=0.508–0.597; p=0.037).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Although no significant correla tion was found between age at menopause and the number of births in patients aged
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Many factors influence the etiology of uterine prolapse (UP). This study, therefore, analyzed factors affecting UPin nongeriatric and geriatric age groups. Materials and Methods: The 494 patients included in the study were divided into two groups: 317 nongeriatric patients(aged 3 (area under the curve [AUC]=0.553; 95% CI=0.508–0.597; p=0.037). Although the AUC value (AUC=0.635) calculated for the number of births in patients aged ≥65 was higher than those calculated for body massindex and the number of miscarriages (AUC=0.582 and AUC=0.583, respectively), this difference was not statisticallysignificant (p>0.05). Conclusion: UP is closely related to the number of births and the presence of menopause. Although no significant correla tion was found between age at menopause and the number of births in patients aged

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAMBURACI, E. (2022). Associated Factors Causing Uterine Prolapsein Nongeriatric and Geriatric Female PatientPopulations and Analysis of Pathological Diagnoses. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 5, 443–448. https://ajindex.com/articles/502203

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Isık H, Aynıoglu O, Sahbaz A, Selimoglu R, Timur H, Harma M. Are hypertension and diabetes mellitus risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 197: 59–62
  2. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, et al; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 2008; 300(11): 1311–6
  3. Khadgi J, Poudel A. Uterine prolapse: a hidden tragedy of women in rural Nepal. Int Urogynecol J 2018; 29(11): 1575–8
  4. Shrestha B, Onta S, Choulagai B, Paudel R, Petzold M, Krettek A. Uterine prolapse and its impact on quality of life in the Jhaukhel-Duwakot Health Demographic Surveillance Site, Bhaktapur, Nepal. Glob Health Action 2015; 8: 28771
  5. Mezzadri M. Pelvic organ prolapse physiopathology. Rev Prat 2019; 69(4): 385–6
  6. Vergeldt TF, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 2015; 26(11): 1559–73
  7. Lo TS, Jaili S, Uy-Patrimonio MC, Karim NB, Ibrahim R. Transvaginal management of severe pelvic organ prolapse in nulliparous women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res.ü 2017; 43(3): 543–50
  8. Sieber CC. The elderly patient--who is that?. [Article in German]. Internist (Berl) 2007; 48(11): 1190–4
  9. Cole TJ, Lobstein T. Extended international (IOTF) body mass index cut-offs for thinness, overweight and obesity. Pediatr Obes 2012; 7(4): 284–94
  10. Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, Camargo S, Dandolu V, Digesu A, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J 2016; 27(2): 165–94
  11. Chung SH, Kim WB. Various approaches and treatments for pelvic organ prolapse in women. J Menopausal Med 2018; 24(3): 155–62
  12. Nygaard IE, Shaw JM. Physical activity and the pelvic floor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214(2): 164–71
  13. Casey EK, Temme K. Pelvic floor muscle function and urinary incontinence in the female athlete. Phys Sportsmed 2017; 45(4): 399–407
  14. Blomquist JL, Carroll M, Muñoz A, Handa VL. Pelvic floor muscle strength and the incidence of pelvic floor disorders after vaginal and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222(1): 62.e1–e8
  15. Peker N, Erdem B, Kaban A. Does home birth reduce the risk of pelvic organ prolapse?. Ginekol Pol 2018; 89(8): 432–6
  16. Worda C, Walch K, Sator M, Eppel W, Tempfer CB, Schneeberger Cet al. T