KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Stereopsis in Children with Corrected Anisometropia According to Type, Severity, and Presence of Amblyopia

Funda DİKKAYA
Sevil KARAMAN ERDUR
Sayfa
387–391
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This result suggests that as long as patients have good visual acuity, stereopsis is preserved, and that refractive correction with glasses does not interfere with stereopsis in childhood anisometropia.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: This study was designed to determine the level of stereopsis in anisometropic children with and without amblyopia who used corrective glasses and to investigate the effect of the type and magnitude of anisometropia on the level of stereopsis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: The medical records of 256 children with a diagnosis of non-amblyopic anisometropia or anisometropic amblyopia, and healthy controls were retrospectively reviewed for this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This result suggests that as long as patients have good visual acuity, stereopsis is preserved, and that refractive correction with glasses does not interfere with stereopsis in childhood anisometropia.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to determine the level of stereopsis in anisometropic children with and without amblyopia who used corrective glasses and to investigate the effect of the type and magnitude of anisometropia on the level of stereopsis. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 256 children with a diagnosis of non-amblyopic anisometropia or anisometropic amblyopia, and healthy controls were retrospectively reviewed for this study. Anisometropia was categorized into 3 groups: spherical equivalent-only anisometropia, astigmatic-only anisometropia, or combined anisometropia. The level of stereopsis was measured using the Titmus stereo test, compared between groups, and the correlation of the stereopsis with the magnitude of anisometropia was analyzed. Results: Patients in the non-amblyopic anisometropia group had a similar stereopsis level when compared with the control group (55.2±41.03 and 47.2±19.8 seconds of arc, respectively; p=0.223). The level of stereopsis was significantly less in the anisometropic amblyopia group (279.4±120 seconds of arc) compared with the non-amblyopic anisometropia (55.2±41.03 seconds of arc) and control groups (47.2±19.8 seconds of arc) (p=0.008, p=0.006, respectively). A greater spherical equivalent difference between the eyes resulted in poorer stereopsis in the anisometropic amblyopia group, and combined anisometropia was found to be associated with poorer stereopsis levels in the nonamblyopic anisometropia (NA) group. Conclusion: The NA patients had a similar level of stereopsis compared with controls while wearing corrective glasses. This result suggests that as long as patients have good visual acuity, stereopsis is preserved, and that refractive correction with glasses does not interfere with stereopsis in childhood anisometropia.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DİKKAYA, F., ERDUR, S. K. (2022). Evaluation of Stereopsis in Children with Corrected Anisometropia According to Type, Severity, and Presence of Amblyopia. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4, 387–391. https://ajindex.com/articles/502111

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Levi DM. Rethinking amblyopia 2020. Vision Res 2020; 176: 118– 29
  2. Attebo K, Mitchell P, Cumming R, Smith W, Jolly N, Sparkes R. Prevalence and causes of amblyopia in an adult population. Ophthalmology 1998; 105(1): 154–9
  3. American Academy of Ophthalmology Pediatric Ophthalmology/Strabismus Panel. Preferred Practice Pattern®. Pediatric Eye Evaluations. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2017
  4. Levi DM, Knill DC, Bavelier D. Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review. Vision Res 2015; 114: 17–30
  5. Brooks SE, Johnson D, Fischer N. Anisometropia and binocularity. Ophthalmology 1996; 103(7): 1139–43
  6. Chen SI, Hove M, McCloskey CL, Kaye SB. The effect of monocularly and binocularly induced astigmatic blur on depth discrimination is orientation dependent. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82(2): 101–13
  7. Atchison DA, Lee J, Lu J, Webber AL, Hess RF, Baldwin AS, et al. Effects of simulated anisometropia and aniseikonia on stereopsis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2020; 40(3): 323–32
  8. Lee JY, Seo JY, Baek SU. The effects of glasses for anisometropia on stereopsis. Am J Ophthalmol 2013; 156(6): 1261–6.e1
  9. Jeon HS, Choi DG. Stereopsis and fusion in anisometropia according to the presence of amblyopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017; 255(12): 2487–92
  10. Wallace DK, Lazar EL, Melia M, Birch EE, Holmes JM, Hopkins KB, et al; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Stereoacuity in children with anisometropic amblyopia. J AAPOS 2011; 15(5): 455–61
  11. Von Noorden GK. Introduction to neuromuscular anomalies of the eyes. In: Binocular vision and ocular motility; theory and management of strabismus. Klein EA, editor. 4th ed. Mosby: St. Louis; 1990. p.208–11
  12. Chen BB, Song FW, Sun ZH, Yang Y. Anisometropia magnitude and visual deficits in previously untreated anisometropic amblyopia. Int J Ophthalmol 2013; 6(5): 606–10
  13. Weakley DR Jr. The association between nonstrabismic anisometropia, amblyopia, and subnormal binocularity. Ophthalmology 2001; 108(1): 163–71
  14. Çalık G, Kayman-Güvelli A, Acar S. Fusion and stereopsis in anisometropic amblyopia and strabismic amblyopia. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2004; 13(3): 117–23
  15. Atilla H, Erkam N. Comparison of anisometropes with and without amblyopia. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011; 59(3): 215–6
  16. Katsumi O, Tanino T, Hirose T. Effect of aniseikonia on binocular function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986; 27(4): 601–4
  17. South J, Gao T, Collins A, Turuwhenua J, Robertson K, Black J. Aniseikon