Dergiler / ENT Updates / 2022 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Risk Factors for Postoperative Neck Complaints After Robot-Assisted Surgery. A Systematic Literature Review

Sayfa
1–12
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Upcoming robotic surgeries in the head and neck area pose a clinical need for more specific studies on postoperative iatrogenic complaints.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: Robot-assisted and image-guided surgery have become increasingly important because it outperforms human dexterity.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: Seven eligible studies were identified, only 2 concerned surgery requiring head fixation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Upcoming robotic surgeries in the head and neck area pose a clinical need for more specific studies on postoperative iatrogenic complaints.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted and image-guided surgery have become increasingly important because it outperforms human dexterity. For procedures on sub-millimetric level, fixing the patient’s head firmly is crucial. Although the neck is not the target organ of the operation, it may be at risk of postoperative complaints due to positioning or fixation. The incidence of postoperative symptoms after head and neck surgery with fixation is hardly reported and probably underestimated, in regards to the lifethreatening cranial pathologies for which the surgery was required. Methods: To identify papers on risk factors for postoperative complaints after head and neck surgery, we performed a systematic review. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched using predefined in- and exclusion criteria. Meta-analyses and reviews were excluded. Postoperative complaints concerned pain, quality of life, discomfort, neuropraxia, and musculoskeletal problems. This review is reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Results: Seven eligible studies were identified, only 2 concerned surgery requiring head fixation. The significant risk factors resulting from our analysis were preoperative pain (odds ratio = 2.19), expected pain (odds ratio = 2.15), short-term fear (odds ratio = 1.42), age between 45 and 59 years old (odds ratio = 1.40), pain catastrophizing (odds ratio = 1.21), and female gender (odds ratio = 0.74). Conclusion: Six significant risk factors for iatrogenic postoperative complaints after head and neck surgery have been identified. These risk factors should be considered as possible confounding factors in future research. Little literature could be found. Upcoming robotic surgeries in the head and neck area pose a clinical need for more specific studies on postoperative iatrogenic complaints.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ROMMERS, E., JACXSENS, L., BRUSSEL, N. V., HERTOGH, W. D., TOPSAKAL, V. (2022). Risk Factors for Postoperative Neck Complaints After Robot-Assisted Surgery. A Systematic Literature Review. ENT Updates, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 1–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/501370

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Center RhaNS. Robotic Head and Neck Surgery Center. http: //www.otol aryng ology.pitt.edu/ cente rs-ex celle nce/r oboti c-hea d-and -neck -surg ery-c enter
  2. Rangarajan S, Hachem RA, Ozer E, Beer-Furlan A, Prevedello D, Carrau RL. Robotics in sinus and skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2017;50(3):633-641. [CrossRef] 3. Zamorano L, Li Q, Jain S, Kaur G. Robotics in neurosurgery: state of the art and future technological challenges. Int J Med Robot. 2004;1(1):7-22. [CrossRef] 4. Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH, et al. Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery. 2009;146(6):1048- 1055. [CrossRef] 5. Serpell JW, Grodski SF, O'Donell C. Does neck extension elevate the thyroid gland cephalad to potentially improve access during thyroidectomy? ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(11):887-889. [CrossRef] 6. Abergel A, Fliss DM, Margalit N, Gil Z. A prospective evaluation of short-term health-related quality of life in patients undergoing anterior skull base surgery. Skull Base. 2010;20(1):27-33. [CrossRef] 7. Shah JP. Quality of life after skull base surgery: the Patient's predicament. Skull Base. 2010;20(1):3-4. [CrossRef] 8. Ausman JI. A revolution in skull base surgery: the quality of life matters! Surg Neurol. 2006;65(6):635-636. [CrossRef] 9. Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, et al. Quality of life following surgery for anterior skull base tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(12):1303-1309. [CrossRef] 10. Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, Shabtai E, Khafif A, Fliss DM. Development of a cancer-specific anterior skull base quality-of-life questionnaire. J Neurosurg. 2004;100(5):813-819. [CrossRef] 11. Castelnuovo P, Lepera D, Turri-Zanoni M, et al. Quality of life following endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior skull base cancers. J Neurosurg. 2013;119(6):1401-1409. [CrossRef] 12. Cavel O, Abergel A, Margalit N, Fliss DM, Gil Z. Quality of life following endoscopic resection of skull base tumors. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2012;73(2):112-116. [CrossRef] 13. de Almeida JR, Vescan AD, Witterick IJ, et al. Changes experienced in quality of life for skull base surgical patients: a qualitative case study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015;76(2):129-144. [CrossRef] 14. Nikolopoulos TP, Johnson I, O'Donoghue GM. Quality of life after acoustic neuroma surgery. Laryngoscope. 1998;108(9):1382-1385. [CrossRef] 15. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The