Dergiler / ENT Updates / 2022 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Endoscopic Treatment of Juvenile Angiofibromas: Experience of a Tertiary Center from 1993 to 2020

Sayfa
17–28
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This technique should be used as the first choice in the treatment of small to medium-sized tumors (I-IIB) and is a worthy alternative to open surgery for advanced tumor stages (IIC-IIIB) when performed by an experienced surgeon.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Juvenile angiofibromas are benign tumors that almost exclusively affect male adolescents.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: The medical records of 39 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery for a juvenile angiofibroma were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This technique should be used as the first choice in the treatment of small to medium-sized tumors (I-IIB) and is a worthy alternative to open surgery for advanced tumor stages (IIC-IIIB) when performed by an experienced surgeon.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Juvenile angiofibromas are benign tumors that almost exclusively affect male adolescents. Over the last decades, there is an evolution from open surgery to less-invasive endoscopic techniques. Methods: The medical records of 39 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery for a juvenile angiofibroma were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The distribution of the tumor stages according to the classification system of Radkowski was as follows: 1 in stage IA, 5 in IB, 7 in IIA, 13 in IIB, 5 in IIC, 4 in IIIA, and 4 in IIIB. Preoperative angiography with embolization was performed in all but 1 patient. The mean postoperative follow-up time was 32 months. Five patients (12.8%) had a recurrence after a mean period of 9 months (range 3-24 months), of which 2 initially had incomplete macroscopic tumor removal due to intracranial extension. The mean operating time was 106 minutes (range 35-400 minutes). The mean duration of hospitalization was 4.3 days (range 1-9 days). Two patients (5.1%) had postoperative bleeding out of the internal maxillary artery for which a reintervention and blood transfusion was needed. Conclusions: Endoscopic surgery for juvenile angiofibromas is an effective and safe technique with good outcomes and low postoperative morbidity. This technique should be used as the first choice in the treatment of small to medium-sized tumors (I-IIB) and is a worthy alternative to open surgery for advanced tumor stages (IIC-IIIB) when performed by an experienced surgeon.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

POELS, L., GERVEN, L. V., JORISSEN, M. (2022). Endoscopic Treatment of Juvenile Angiofibromas: Experience of a Tertiary Center from 1993 to 2020. ENT Updates, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 17–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/501367

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Lund VJ, Stammberger H, Nicolai P, et al. European position paper on endoscopic management of tumours of the nose, paranasal sinuses and skull base. Rhinol Suppl. 2010;22:1-143
  2. Glad H, Vainer B, Buchwald C, et al. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas in Denmark 1981-2003: diagnosis, incidence, and treatment. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007;127(3):292-299. [CrossRef] 3. Neel HB III, Whicker JH, Devine KD, Weiland LH. Juvenile angiofibroma: review of 120 cases. Am J Surg. 1973;126(4):547-556. [CrossRef] 4. Lloyd G, Howard D, Phelps P, Cheesman A. Juvenile angiofibroma: the lessons of 20 years of modern imaging. J Laryngol Otol. 1999;113(2):127-134. [CrossRef] 5. Mills S, Gaffey M, Frierson Jr H. Tumours of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract and Ear. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology under the Auspices of Universities Associated for Research and Education in Pathology, 2000
  3. Beham A, Beham-Schmid C, Regauer S, Auböck L, Stammberger H. Nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: true neoplasm or vascular malformation? Adv Anat Pathol. 2000;7(1):36-46. [CrossRef] 7. Schick B, Plinkert PK, Prescher A. Aetiology of angiofibromas: reflection on their specific vascular component. Laryngorhinootologie. 2002;81(4):280-284. [CrossRef] 8. Sessions RB, Bryan RN, Naclerio RM, Alford BR. Radiographic staging of juvenile angiofibroma. Head Neck Surg. 1981;3(4):279-283. [CrossRef] 9. Fisch U. The infratemporal fossa approach for nasopharyngeal tumours. Laryngoscope. 1983;93(1):36-44. [CrossRef] 10. Chandler JR, Goulding R, Moskowitz L, Quencer RM. Nasopharyngeal angiofibromas: staging and management. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1984;93(4 Pt 1):322-329. [CrossRef] 11. Andrews JC, Fisch U, Valavanis A, Aeppli U, Makek MS. The surgical management of extensive nasopharyngeal angiofibromas with the infra-temporal fossa approach. Laryngoscope. 1989;99(4):429-437. [CrossRef] 12. Radkowski D, McGill T, Healy GB, Ohlms L, Jones DT. Angiofibroma. Changes in staging and treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(2):122-129. [CrossRef] 13. Onerci M, Oğretmenoğlu O, Yücel T. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: a revised staging system. Rhinology. 2006;44(1):39-45
  4. Snyderman CH, Pant H, Carrau RL, Gardner P. A new endoscopic staging system for angiofibromas. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136(6):588-594. [CrossRef]
  5. Tosun F, Ozer C, Gerek M, Yetiser S. Surgical approaches for nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: comparative analysis and current trends. J Craniofac Surg.