Dergiler / EKEV Akademi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 90

THE EXTENT OF THE REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY IN THE READING COMPREHENSION QUESTIONS OF THE COURSE BOOK COVER TO COVER 3 FOR READING COMPREHENSION AND FLUENCY

Sayfa
497–508
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Accordingly, some assumptions have been made to suggest how the reading course books which are being produced or will be produced should hint on the revised taxonomy in their reading questions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The revised Bloom’s taxonomy is a cognitive process model measuring learners’ comprehension levels through the use of filtered terms.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The revised taxonomy is the refurbished form of the former Bloom’s Taxonomy dating back to 1956, which analyzed cognitive skills.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Accordingly, some assumptions have been made to suggest how the reading course books which are being produced or will be produced should hint on the revised taxonomy in their reading questions.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Cognitive skills · Taxonomy · The revised Bloom’s taxonomy

Abstract

The revised Bloom’s taxonomy is a cognitive process model measuring learners’ comprehension levels through the use of filtered terms. The revised taxonomy is the refurbished form of the former Bloom’s Taxonomy dating back to 1956, which analyzed cognitive skills. Modifications in concepts, system, format and prominence are involved in the revised model. The revised Bloom’s taxonomy covers two learning domains that constitute instructional objectives: cognitive (knowledge) and affective (attitude) and underlines six levels: remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate and create. The verbs highlight the cognitive practices that learners confront and the knowledge they facilitate. For example, an action included in the “remember” level may demand learners to call up the acquired knowledge while a verb included in the “create” level may demand learners to carry out an efficacious project. Thus, this study aims at discovering to what degree the revised Bloom’s taxonomy is referred in the reading questions of a globally written EFL reading course book. On the grounds of the mentioned dimensions, two research questions were developed to reach answers to cognition levels in the taxonomy. The initial research question focused on assessing the lower order while the next one aimed at measuring the higher order cognition level in the related reading comprehension questions. The contained EFL reading course book was examined by means of descriptive content analysis technique. The findings of the study clarified that the evaluated reading course book is deficient in the higher level cognitive domain highlighted in the revised taxonomy. Accordingly, some assumptions have been made to suggest how the reading course books which are being produced or will be produced should hint on the revised taxonomy in their reading questions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KASİMİ, Y. (2022). THE EXTENT OF THE REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY IN THE READING COMPREHENSION QUESTIONS OF THE COURSE BOOK COVER TO COVER 3 FOR READING COMPREHENSION AND FLUENCY. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 90, 497–508. https://ajindex.com/articles/498241

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 103(3), 152. Amer, A. (2006). Reflections on Bloom's revised taxonomy. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 4(1), 213-230.
  2. Assaly, I. R. & Smadi, O. M. (2015). Using Bloom's Taxonomy to evaluate the cognitive levels of master class textbook's questions. English Language Teaching, 8(5), 100-110.
  3. Attia, A. S. (2021). Bloom’s Taxonomy as a tool to optimize course learning outcomes and assessments in Architecture Programs. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 24(3), 315-322.
  4. Bhagyalakshmi, H. R. & Seshachalam, D. (2015). Student performance using Blooms cognitionlevels:Acase study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Special Issue, 122-125.
  5. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay. Bümen, N. T. (2010). Program geliştirmede bir dönüm noktası: Yenilenmiş Bloom Taksonomisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 31(142). Chipman, S. F., Segal,J. W. & Glaser, R. (2013). Higher cognitive goals for education: An introduction. In Thinking and learning skills (pp. 13-30). New York: Routledge. Choudhary, T. & Raikwal, J. (2014). Improving teaching-learning process using Bloom’s Taxonomy and correlation analysis. Department of Computer Engineering Institute of Engineering and Technology, 3(6), 1747-1750.
  6. Churches, A. (2008). Bloom's taxonomy blooms digitally. Tech & Learning, 1, 1-6.
  7. Ernawati, E. & Baharullah, B. (2020). Analysis of higher order thinking skills(hots) in mathematical problem solving based on revised blooms’taxonomy viewed from gender equality. MaPan: Jurnal Matematikadan Pembelajaran, 8(2), 315-328.
  8. Eskridge, L. (2010). Teaching Soil Conservation in an Introductory Soil Science Laboratory and the Classification of Examinations Using the Revised Blooms Taxonomy (Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University). Forehand, M. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, 41(4), 47-56.
  9. Gichuhi, C. (2014). Teachers’ competence in tests construction within blooms taxonomy for effective learning assessment: a case study of Kikuyu district, Kiambu county (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi). Gonzalez-Cabezas, C., Anderson, O. S., Wright, M. C. & Fontana, M. (2015). Association between dental student-developed exam questions and learning at higher cognitive levels. Journal of dental education, 79(11), 1295-1304. Gul