Dergiler / E Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Carotid Artery Stenting Using the Double Embolic Protection Technique

Sayfa
200–206
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Carotid stenting and double cerebral protection devices can be applied with acceptable complications in experienced centers and in suitable patients, especially in those with high surgical risk

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Severe internal carotid artery stenosis is observed in 2%-8% of the population and responsible for 20%-30% of all strokes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The reliability of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with high thrombus burden and vulnerable plaques and the treatment strategy in these patients remain unclear.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Carotid stenting and double cerebral protection devices can be applied with acceptable complications in experienced centers and in suitable patients, especially in those with high surgical risk
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: Severe internal carotid artery stenosis is observed in 2%-8% of the population and responsible for 20%-30% of all strokes. The reliability of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with high thrombus burden and vulnerable plaques and the treatment strategy in these patients remain unclear. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the short-term and long-term results of the use of double embolism protection devices in high-risk patients. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent carotid artery stenting between December 2016 and 2019 in our center were evaluated retrospectively. Among these patients, 17 patients in whom double embolism protection devices were used during stenting procedure were included in the study. Results: The mean age of the patients was 76±7.1 years and 13 of them were male. All patients had hypertension and 82.3% had diabetes mellitus. All patients were symptomatic. Both distal and proximal cerebral protection devices were used together during the procedure. While no death was observed after the procedure, contralateral major stroke was observed in one patient and transient ischemic attack was observed in two patients. Restenosis was not observed in the control carotid Doppler ultrasonography, which was performed after the procedure, within the first year of follow up. Conclusion: In this study, the feasibility and reliability of using distal and proximal cerebral protection devices together in high-risk patients were shown. Carotid stenting and double cerebral protection devices can be applied with acceptable complications in experienced centers and in suitable patients, especially in those with high surgical risk

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Baştuğ, S. (2022). Carotid Artery Stenting Using the Double Embolic Protection Technique. E Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 200–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/498210

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011;123:e18-e209
  2. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1493- 501
  3. Gargiulo G, Sannino A, Stabile E, Perrino C, Trimarco B, Esposito G. New cerebral lesions at magnetic resonance imaging after carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: an updated meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0129209
  4. Saam T, Hetterich H, Hoffmann V, et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the predictive value of carotid plaque hemorrhage on cerebrovascular events by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1081-91
  5. Clinical alert: benefit of carotid endarterectomy for patients with high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Stroke and Trauma Division. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) investigators. Stroke 1991;22:816-7
  6. Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P, et al. Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1572- 9
  7. Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G, et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2010;363:11-23
  8. Finol EA, Siewiorek GM, Scotti CM, Wholey MH, Wholey MH. Wall apposition assessment and performance comparison of distal protection filters. J Endovasc Ther 2008;15:177-85
  9. Chen CI, Iguchi Y, Garami Z, et al. Analysis of emboli during carotid stenting with distal protection device. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006;21:223-8
  10. Bijuklic K, Wandler A, Hazizi F, Schofer J. The PROFI study (Prevention of Cerebral Embolization by Proximal Balloon Occlusion Compared to Filter Protection During Carotid Artery Stenting): a prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1383-9
  11. Howard G, Roubin GS, Jansen O, et al. Association between age and risk of stroke or death from carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting: a meta-analysis of pooled patient data from four randomised trials. Lancet 2016;387:1305-11
  12. Texakalidis P, Giannopoulos S, Kokkinidis DG, Lanzino G. Effect of openvs closed-cell stent design on periprocedural outcomes and restenosis after carotid artery stenting: a systematic review and comprehensive metaanalysis. J Endovasc Ther 2018;25:523-33.