KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Development of a Short Form: Methods, Examinations and Recommendations

Hakan KOĞAR
Sayfa
302–310
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The samepsychometric standards are sought for each measurement tools.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this review is to explain the methods that can be used when developing short form of a measurementtool and to examine some short form development studies in the field of health sciences literature by taking intoconsideration the criticisms of short form development studies.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It is seen that short form development studies areespecially concentrated in the fields of health sciences.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The samepsychometric standards are sought for each measurement tools.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this review is to explain the methods that can be used when developing short form of a measurementtool and to examine some short form development studies in the field of health sciences literature by taking intoconsideration the criticisms of short form development studies. It is seen that short form development studies areespecially concentrated in the fields of health sciences. The main reason for this situation has been shown thatclinicians need fast and reliable measurement tools to reduce the pressure on them. The review results of the 12articles selected for this research show that there are very few studies that follow the guidelines for short formdevelopment. Researchers are advised to develop the short form of the scale by taking into account the criteriamentioned in this study. It is recommended to select measurement instruments which are developed in accordancewith ethical rules and have sufficient psychometric properties. Clinical researchers should be aware that theperception that measuring instruments containing less items are less valid does not show the truth. The samepsychometric standards are sought for each measurement tools.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KOĞAR, H. (2022). Development of a Short Form: Methods, Examinations and Recommendations. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 302–310. https://ajindex.com/articles/497193

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Baiocco, R., Pallini, S., & Santamaria, F. (2014). The development and validation of an Italian short form of the adolescent friendship attachment scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(4), 247-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175614538060
  2. Biggers, J.L. (1976). An a priori approach for developing short-forms of tests and inventories. The Journal of Experimental Education, 44(3), 8-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1976.11011528
  3. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F. M Lord, & R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (pp. 397–479).
  4. Reading, MA: MIT Press.
  5. Bohlmeijer, E., Ten Klooster, P. M., Fledderus, M., Veehof, M., & Baer, R. (2011). Psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment, 18(3), 308-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111408231
  6. Doll, E. A. (1917). A brief Binet-Simon scale. Psychological Clinic, 11, 197-211.
  7. Doppelt, J. E. (1956). Estimating the full scale score on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale from scores on four subjects. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 20(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044293
  8. Dorigo, M., & Stützle, T. (2004).
  9. Ant colony optimization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1290.001.0001
  10. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
  11. Ferrario, S. R., Panzeri, A., Anselmi, P., & Vidotto, G. (2019). Development and psychometric properties of a short form of the Illness Denial Questionnaire. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 12, 727. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S207622
  12. Jenkinson, C., Kelly, L., Dummett, S., & Morley, D. (2019). The Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ): development of a short form and index measure. Patient Related Outcome Measures, 10, 227- 232. https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S210416
  13. Goretzko, D., Pham, T. T. H., & Bühner, M. (2019). Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice. Current Psychology, (In Press), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00300-2
  14. Hagtevt, K. A., & Sipos, K. (2016). C