Dergiler / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

PIAAC 2012'de Test Katılımının Sessiz Yordayıcıları

Silent Predictors of Test Disengagement in PIAAC 2012

Sayfa
430–450
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

So, this study brings further attention that the role of test disengagement should be a prerequisite practice before reaching a conclusion from international large stake assessments.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Although the effects of test disengagement on the validity of the scores obtained from the data set have been examined in many studies, the predictors of the disengaged behaviors received relatively limited scholarly attention in low-stakes assessment, in particular, in international comparison studies.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The data were collected by using items measuring literacy and numeracy skills of adults from different countries such as Norway, Austria, Ireland, France, Denmark, Germany, and Finland participated in PIAAC 2012.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:So, this study brings further attention that the role of test disengagement should be a prerequisite practice before reaching a conclusion from international large stake assessments.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Although the effects of test disengagement on the validity of the scores obtained from the data set have been examined in many studies, the predictors of the disengaged behaviors received relatively limited scholarly attention in low-stakes assessment, in particular, in international comparison studies. As such, the present study with a twofold purpose sets out to determine the best fitted explanatory item response theory model and examine the predictors of test disengagement. The data were collected by using items measuring literacy and numeracy skills of adults from different countries such as Norway, Austria, Ireland, France, Denmark, Germany, and Finland participated in PIAAC 2012. The results of the model with item and person characteristics demonstrated that adults tended to be disengaged on very difficult items. Similarly, age has a negative effect on test-taking engagement for adults in several countries such as France and Ireland, while several predictors such as educational attainment, readiness to learn, and the use of ICT skills at home and work had positive effects on test engagement. In addition, females exhibit a higher level of engagement in Norway. Overall, the findings suggested that the effect of the predictors on disengagement depended on the domain and country. So, this study brings further attention that the role of test disengagement should be a prerequisite practice before reaching a conclusion from international large stake assessments.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DİBEK, M. İ. (2022). PIAAC 2012'de Test Katılımının Sessiz Yordayıcıları. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 430–450. https://ajindex.com/articles/497189

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education, & Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA. Asseburg, R., & Frey, A. (2013). Too hard, too easy, or just right? The relationship between effort or boredom and ability-difficulty fit. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 55(1), 92–104.
  2. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48
  3. Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., & Fors, U. (2019). Disengagement, engagement and digital skills in technology-enhanced learning. Education and Information Technologies, 149. doi:10.1007/s10639-019-09998-w. Braun, H., Kirsch, I., Yamamoto, K., Park, J., & Eagan, M. K. (2011). An experimental study of the effects of monetary incentives on performance on the 12th-grade NAEP reading assessment. Teachers College Record, 113(11), 2309–2344.
  4. Briggs, D. C. (2008). Using explanatory item response models to analyze group differences in science achievement. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(2), 89-118. doi: 10.1080/08957340801926086. Bridgeman, B., & Cline, F. (2000). Variations in mean response time for questions on the computer-adaptive GRE General Test: Implications for fair assessment. GRE Board Professional Report No. 96-20P. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2016). Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment. New York, NY: Routledge. de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: Guilford Press Demars, C. E. (2007). Changes in rapid-guessing behavior over a series of assessments. Educational Assessment, 12(1), 23–45. doi:10.1080/10627190709336946 DeMars, C. E., Bashkov, B. M., & Socha, A. B. (2013). The role of gender in test-taking motivation under low stakes conditions. Research and Practices in Assessment, 8, 69-82.
  5. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153. Finn, B. (2015). Measuring motivation in low-stakes assessments. ETS Research Report Series, 2015(2),1–17. doi: 10.1002/ets2.12067
  6. Goldhammer, F., Martens, T., & Lüdtke, O. (2017). Conditioning factors of test-taking engagement in PIAAC: an exploratory IRT modelling approach c