KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Nijerya’da İngilizce Sınavına Katılan Öğrenci Puanlarının Güvenilirliğinin Genellenebilirlik Kuramı ile İncelenmesi

Using Generalizability Theory to Investigate the Reliability of Scores Assigned to Students in English Language Examination in Nigeria

Olufunke Favour AKINDAHUNSI
Eyitayo Rufus Ifedayo AFOLABI
Sayfa
147–162
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Hence, it was concluded that the scores were dependable and generalizable.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The study investigated the reliability of scores assigned to students in English language in National ExaminationsCouncil (NECO).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The population consisted of all the students who sat for NECO Senior School CertificateExamination (SSCE) in 2017 in Nigeria.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Hence, it was concluded that the scores were dependable and generalizable.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The study investigated the reliability of scores assigned to students in English language in National ExaminationsCouncil (NECO). The population consisted of all the students who sat for NECO Senior School CertificateExamination (SSCE) in 2017 in Nigeria. A sample of 311,138 was selected using the proportionate stratifiedsampling technique. The Optical Marks Record (OMR) sheet containing the responses of the examinees was theinstrument for the study. The data was analyzed using lme4 package of R language and environment for statisticalcomputing, factor analysis and Tucker index of factor congruence. The psychometric properties of the data weredetermined by estimating the generalizability (g) coefficient, phi (Φ) coefficient and construct validity. Theresults indicated the g-coefficient to be 0.90 and Φ coefficient as 0.87, which is an indication of high reliabilityof scores. The result also showed that a decrease in the number of the items resulted in a decrease in both g- andphi coefficients in D-study. The construct validity of 0.99 obtained from the result affirms the credibility of theitems. Hence, it was concluded that the scores were dependable and generalizable.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKINDAHUNSI, O. F., AFOLABI, E. R. I. (2022). Nijerya’da İngilizce Sınavına Katılan Öğrenci Puanlarının Güvenilirliğinin Genellenebilirlik Kuramı ile İncelenmesi. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 147–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/497169

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Alkharusi, H. (2012). Generalizability theory: An analysis of variance approach to measurement problems in educational assessment. Journal of Studies in Education, 2(1), 184-196. doi: 10.5296/jse.v2i1.1227 Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 Breithaupt, K. (2011). Medical licensure testing: White paper for the assessment review task force of the medical council of Canada. Retrieved from https://www.mcc.ca/wp-content/uploads/Technical-ReportsBreithaupt-2011.pdf
  2. Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer. Brennan, R. L. (2003). Coefficients and indices in generalizability theory (CASMA Research Report Number 1). Iowa: Centre for Advanced Studies in Measurement and Assessment. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. U.S.A: Cengage Learning. de Gruijter, D. N., & van der Kamp, L. J. Th. (2008). Statistical test theory for the behavioural sciences. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC. de Vries, I. M. (2012). An analysis of test construction procedures and score dependability of a paramedic recertification exam (Master’s thesis). Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Desjardins, C. D., & Bulut, O. (2018). Handbook of educational measurement and psychometrics using R (1 st Ed). Parkway, Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/b20498 Fosnacht, K., & Gonyea, R. M. (2018). The dependability of the updated NSSE: A generalizability study. Research and Practice in Assessment 13, 62-73. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1203503
  3. Gugiu, M. R., Gugiu, P. C., & Baldus, R. (2012). Utilizing generalizability theory to investigate the reliability of the grades assigned to undergraduate research papers. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 8(19), 26-40. Retrieved from https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/362
  4. Johnson, S., & Johnson, R. (2009). Conceptualising and interpreting reliability. Coventy: Ofqual Junker, B. W. (2012). Some aspects of classical reliability theory and classical test theory. Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. Kamis, O., & Dogan, C. D. (2018). An investigation of reliability coefficients estimated for decision studies in generalizability theory. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(4), 103-113. doi: 10.5539/jel.v7n4p103 Li, M., Shavelson, R. J., Yin, Y., & Wiley, W. (20