Dergiler / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Examining Students' Item Response Times in eTIMSS According to their Proficiency Levels, Self-Confidence and Item Characteristics

Sayfa
23–39
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Students who were somewhat self-confident in mathematics were more successful in difficult mathematics items and spent less time answering the items.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to examine whether the time spent answering science and mathematics items by Turkish students participating in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) at the 8th grade level showed a significant difference according to their proficiency levels, self-confidence, and the item characteristics.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 577 students who participated in the TIMSS 2019 study at the 8th grade level in Turkey and answered the common 24 (11 mathematics and 13 science) items in Booklets 1 and 2 constituted the study participants.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Students who were somewhat self-confident in mathematics were more successful in difficult mathematics items and spent less time answering the items.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine whether the time spent answering science and mathematics items by Turkish students participating in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) at the 8th grade level showed a significant difference according to their proficiency levels, self-confidence, and the item characteristics. This study was correlational research to explore the relationship between the variables discussed. A total of 577 students who participated in the TIMSS 2019 study at the 8th grade level in Turkey and answered the common 24 (11 mathematics and 13 science) items in Booklets 1 and 2 constituted the study participants. In the data analysis, the Kruskal Wallis-H test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Latent Class Analysis were used. As a result, it was determined that the type of item and cognitive level had a significant relation to the item response times of students. The students were found to spend more time on open-ended items than multiple-choice items. On the other hand, the time spent on items in the applying level was significantly higher than the knowledge level. However, there was no significant difference between the time spent answering items in the applying level and reasoning level. It was observed that if the students' confidence level in science was high, the rate of correct answers was high, and they answered the items in a short amount of time. Students who were somewhat self-confident in mathematics were more successful in difficult mathematics items and spent less time answering the items.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YALÇIN, S. (2022). Examining Students' Item Response Times in eTIMSS According to their Proficiency Levels, Self-Confidence and Item Characteristics. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 23–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/497152

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Altuner, F. (2019). Examining the relationship between item statistics and item response time [Master’s Thesis, Mersin University]. Retrieved from http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/
  2. Birgili, B. (2014). Open ended questions as an alternative to multiple choice: Dilemma in Turkish examination system [Master’s Thesis, Middle East Technical University]. Retrieved from http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/
  3. Davison, M. L., Semmes, R., Huang, L., & Close, C. N. (2012). On the reliability and validity of a numerical reasoning speed dimension derived from response times collected in computerized testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(2), 245-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164411408412
  4. Fishbein, B., Foy, P., & Yin, L. (2021). TIMSS 2019 user guide for the international database. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill. Goldhammer, F., & Klein Entink, R. H. (2011). Speed of reasoning and its relation to reasoning ability. Intelligence, 39(2-3), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2011.02.001
  5. Goldhammer, F., Naumann, J., Stelter, A., Tóth, K., Rölke, H., & Klieme, E. (2014). The time on task effect in reading and problem solving is moderated by task difficulty and skill: Insights from a computer-based large-scale assessment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 608-626. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034716
  6. Halkitis, P. N., Jones, J. P., & Pradhan, J. (1996, April 8-12). Estimating testing time: The effects of ıtem characteristics on response latency [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (n.d.). Trends in international mathematics and science study: Data & tools. https://www.iea.nl/index.php/data-tools/repository/timss
  7. İlgün-Dibek, M. (2020). Silent predictors of test disengagement in PIAAC 2012. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 11(4), 430-450. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.796626
  8. İlhan, M., Boztunç Öztürk, N., & Şahin, M. G. (2020). The effect of the item’s type and cognitive level on its difficulty index: The sample of TIMSS 2015. Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.19.7.2
  9. Kahraman, N., Cuddy, M. C., & Clauser, B. E. (2013). Modeling pacing behavior and test speededness using latent growth curve models. Applied