Dergiler / Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 2022 - Sayı: 29

Teacher Empowerment Strategies: Reasons for Nonfulfillment and Solution Suggestions

Sayfa
179–202
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Following the findings, various suggestions were made on such issues as increasing financial resources that hinder empowerment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This research was carried out to determine the empowerment strategies school principals should implement and the reasons for not being empowering.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It was conducted with four elementary school teachers and four school principals in a city in the Aegean Region in the 2017-2018 academic year.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Following the findings, various suggestions were made on such issues as increasing financial resources that hinder empowerment.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017-2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Elementary school · teacher · principal

Abstract

This research was carried out to determine the empowerment strategies school principals should implement and the reasons for not being empowering. It was conducted with four elementary school teachers and four school principals in a city in the Aegean Region in the 2017-2018 academic year. In the study, descriptive phenomenology design, one of the qualitative research designs, was used. According to the results, it was revealed that the empowerment strategies to be implemented by school principals were classified under the categories of physical and psychological support, communication, school functioning, and teacher autonomy. The reasons for not making teacher empowerment by school principals were determined as personal, administrative, financial, and limited authority reasons. What the Ministry of National Education should do for teacher empowerment was revealed. They should adopt policies that support personal development and teacher autonomy, increase the authority of school principals, and make changes in the legislation. Following the findings, various suggestions were made on such issues as increasing financial resources that hinder empowerment.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CELIK, N. C., KIRAL, B. (2022). Teacher Empowerment Strategies: Reasons for Nonfulfillment and Solution Suggestions. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 2022 - Sayı: 29, 179–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/496879

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Acaray, T. (2010). The teacher empowerment patterns of principals in the public schools of central districts in Ankara province (Unpublished Master Thesis). Ankara University, Ankara.
  2. Ahrari, S., Roslan, S., Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Rasdi, R. M., & Samah, A. A. (2021). Relationship between teacher empowerment and job satisfaction: A meta-analytic path analysis. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1-23.
  3. Akbasli, S., & Dis, O. (2019). Competencies of school managers as a leader according to teachers’ views. International Journal of Leadership Studies: Theory and Practice, 2(2), 86-102.
  4. Akcakaya, M. (2004). Methods of staff reinforcement in organisations: Staff reinforcement in Turkish public administration. Journal of Black Sea Studies, 25, 145-174.
  5. Alosaimi, M. D. (2016). The role of knowledge management approaches for enhancing and supporting education (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Universite Paris 1, Pantheon- Sorbonne, Paris. Altug, D. (1997). Toplam kalite yonetimi anlayisi. Haberal. Avidov-Ungar, O., & Arviv-Elyashiv, R. (2018). Teacher perceptions of empowerment and promotion during reforms. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(1), 155-170.
  6. Aydin, M. (2014).
  7. Egitim yonetimi. Ilksan. Babaoglan, E., & Yilmaz, F. (2012). Ilkogretim okullarinda karara katilma. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 8, 1-12.
  8. Balci, A. (2014). Etkili okul ve okul gelistirme. PegemAkademi. Barutcugil, I. (2004). Organizasyonlarda duygularin yonetimi. Kariyer. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1996). The micropolitical orientation of facilitative school principals and its effects on teachers’ sense of empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 35(2), 138-164.
  9. Bursalioglu, Z. (2008). Okul yonetiminde yeni yapi ve davranis. PegemA. Cheong, M., Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Spain, S. M., & Tsai, C. Y. (2019). A review of the effectiveness of empowering leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 34-58.
  10. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating Theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482.
  11. Conway, J. A., & Calzi, F. (1995). The dark side of shared decision making. Journal of Educational Leadership, 53(4), 45. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage. Cavus, M. F. (2006). An application in manufacturing industry on the effects of organisational creativity and innovativeness of employee empowerment applications in companies (Unpublished doctoral