Dergiler / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Late Psychiatric Consequences In Disability Patients Injured In Traffic Accidents

Sayfa
281–288
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition, this support, which will be included in the medical records, will prevent much loss of rights of the victims in countries that do not have regular psychological examination records.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The present study aimed to describe the late psychiatric consequences in road traffic accidents (RTAs) victims who were referred to us for disability examination months or even years after the injury, and to evaluate according to to the civil an d penal laws in force in Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A retrospective examination was made of the files sent by the courts to the expert committee chaired by the authors for the determination of applicants’ disability rate over the 7-year period between 2014 and 2020.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition, this support, which will be included in the medical records, will prevent much loss of rights of the victims in countries that do not have regular psychological examination records.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The present study aimed to describe the late psychiatric consequences in road traffic accidents (RTAs) victims who were referred to us for disability examination months or even years after the injury, and to evaluate according to to the civil an d penal laws in force in Turkey. A retrospective examination was made of the files sent by the courts to the expert committee chaired by the authors for the determination of applicants’ disability rate over the 7-year period between 2014 and 2020. Of 774 victims of RTA, 3.6% (n=28) had late psychiatric outcomes, including 1.9% post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE), 1.0% post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and 0.6% frontal lobe syndrome (FLS). The 28 cases comprised 18 males and 10 females with a mean age of 25.6±14.4 years. Of these patients, 10 were pedestrians, 12 were passengers and 6 were drivers. Disability rates ranged from 5% to 90% in the patients with PTE, were 40% or 60% in patients with PTSD, and were 25% or 40% in patients with FLS. In patients who have been exposed to serious traumas such as RTAs, providing psychiatric support during or after medical treatment is of undeniable importance for the patient’s full health. In addition, this support, which will be included in the medical records, will prevent much loss of rights of the victims in countries that do not have regular psychological examination records.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HEKİMOĞLU, Y., TAŞTEKİN, B., SARI, M., ASİRDİZER, M. (2022). Late Psychiatric Consequences In Disability Patients Injured In Traffic Accidents. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 281–288. https://ajindex.com/articles/494817

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Bener A, Rahman YS, Mitra B. Incidence and severity of head and neck injuries in victims of road traffic crashes: In an economically developed country. Int Emerg Nurs 2009; 17: 52-59.
  2. Deore PR, Mistry RR. Etiopathological study of head injury cases admitted in Urban set up: retrospective study. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; Surgical Speciality Issue. March 2019; 8: 19-22.
  3. Yavuz MS, Asirdizer M, Cetin G, et al. The correlation between skull fractures and intracranial lesions due to traffic accidents. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2003; 24: 339-345.
  4. Pilitsis JG, Rengachary SS. Complications of head injury. Neurological Research 2001; 23: 227-236.
  5. Hasanovic M, Salihovic D, Kurt A. Mental changes in a patient with unrecognized commotio brain after a traffic accident with trauma brain injury. J Neurol Stroke 2014; 1: 00005. Blanchard EB, Veazey CH. Mental disorders resulting from road traffic accidents. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 2001; 14: 143-147. Christensen J. The Epidemiology of posttraumatic epilepsy. Semin Neurol 2015; 35: 218-222.
  6. Pickelsimer EE, Selassie AW, Gu JK, et al. A population-based outcomes study of persons hospitalized with traumatic brain injury: operations of the South Carolina Traumatic Brain Injury Follow-up Registry. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2006; 21: 491-504.
  7. Mayou R, Bryant B, Duthie R. Psychiatric consequences of road traffic accidents. BMJ 1993; 307: 647-651.
  8. Dunne J, Quiñones-Ossa GA, Still EG, et al. The epidemiology of traumatic brain ınjury due to traffic accidents in Latin America: A narrative review. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2020; 11: 287-290.
  9. Hekimoglu Y, Gumus O, Kartal E, Etli Y, Demir U, Asirdizer M. The evaluation of relationship between disability rates and age and gender. Van Medical Journal 2017; 24: 173-181.
  10. Majdan M, Mauritz W, Wilbacher I, et al. Traumatic brain injuries caused by traffic accidents in five European countries: outcome and public health consequences. Eur J Public Health 2013; 23: 682-687.
  11. Xu T, Yu X, Ou S, et al. Risk factors for posttraumatic epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Behav 2017; 67: 1-6.
  12. Rao VR, Parko KL. Clinical approach to posttraumatic epilepsy. Semin Neurol 2015; 35: 57- 63. Aslan K, Bozdemir H, Demir T. Traumatic head injury in epileptic patients and relation with prognosis. Epilepsi 2011; 17: 46-52.
  13. Uslu Kuzudisli S, Geyik S, Geyik AM, et al. A clinical problem that should not be forgotten in head trauma: post-traumatic epilepsy. Turkish J Neuros