Arş. Gör. Ferat YILMAZ Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi, Diyarbakır Kitabın Adı : Nitel Araştırmaya Giriş Kitabın Yazar ( ları ) : CorGlesne (Çeviri: Ali Ersoy ve Pelin Yalçınoğlu) Yayın Yılı : 2012Yayınevi ve Yeri : Anı Yayıncılık Ankara Genel Tanıtım :

Kaynakça (11)

1. Alexopoulou, E. & Driver, R. (1996). Small-group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1099-1114.
2. Aufschnaiter, C. V., Erduran, S., Osborne, J. & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to Argue: case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101-131
3. Bell, P. &Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797-817.
4. Burns, J. (1997). Achieving understanding in science. (eds. B. Bell & R. Baker) Developing the science curriculum in Aotearoa New Zealand. Auckland: Longman, pp. 23-38.
5. Crawford, T., Kelly, G. J. & Brown, C. (2000). Ways of knowing beyond facts and laws of science: An ethnographic investigation of student engagement in scientific practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 237- 258. Deveci, A. (2009). İlköğretim yedinci sınıf öğrencilerinin maddenin yapısı konusunda sosyobilimsel argümantasyon, bilgi seviyeleri ve bilişsel düşünme becerilerini geliştirmek. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
6. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E. & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12. Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
7. Duschl, R. A. & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
8. Erduran, S., Simon, S. & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933.
9. Erduran, S. & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2007). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. Springer. Geddis, A. N. (1991). Improving the quality of science classroom discourse on controversial issues. Science Education, 75(2), 169-183.
10. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B. & Duschl, R. A. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792.
11. Kaya, O. N. (2005). T artışma teorisine dayalı öğretim yaklaşımının öğrencilerin maddenin tanecikli yapısı konusundaki başarılarına ve bili