Semptomatik ve asemptomatik hastalarda karotid arter aterom plak içeriğinin karşılaştırılması

Amaç & Hipotez:A Am ma aç ç: : Semptomatik ve asemptomatik karotid arter stenozlu hastalara ait endarterektomi plaklarında homosistein, von Willebrand faktörü (vWF), fibrin ve C-reaktif protein (CRP) değerleri ölçülerek guruplar arasında fark olup olmadığı irdelendi.

📊

Temel Bulgular & Veri:G Ge er re eç çv ve eY Yö ön nt te em ml le er r: :Karotis endarterektomisi yapılan, yaşları 54 ile 77 arasında değişen (ort. 64,16) 23’ü erkek 13’ü kadın, 20’si semptomatik, 16’sı asemptomatik toplam 36 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi.

💡

Sonuç & Katkı:İstatistiksel analiz için SPSS for Windows 10.0 programı kullanıldı.

🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi

📍Kapsam:36 hasta

⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

A Am ma aç ç: : Semptomatik ve asemptomatik karotid arter stenozlu hastalara ait endarterektomi plaklarında homosistein, von Willebrand faktörü (vWF), fibrin ve C-reaktif protein (CRP) değerleri ölçülerek guruplar arasında fark olup olmadığı irdelendi. G Ge er re eç çv ve eY Yö ön nt te em ml le er r: :Karotis endarterektomisi yapılan, yaşları 54 ile 77 arasında değişen (ort. 64,16) 23’ü erkek 13’ü kadın, 20’si semptomatik, 16’sı asemptomatik toplam 36 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Karotid arter aterom plakları supernatant haline getirildikten sonra alınan numunelerden homosistein, fibrin, vWF, CRP değerleri ölçüldü. İstatistiksel analiz için SPSS for Windows 10.0 programı kullanıldı. P

Abstract

O Ob bj je ec ct ti iv ve e: :Homocystein, von Willebrand factor (vWF), fibrin and C-reactive protein (CRP) values were measured in carotid artery plaques from symptomatic and asymptomatic pa- tients with carotid stenosis. The values were evaluated between groups. M Ma at te er ri ia al la an nd dM Me et th ho od ds s: : 36 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy, aged 54 to 77 (mean age: 64.16, 23 male, 13 fe- male) were included in the study. 20 of them were symptomatic, 16 asymptomatic. Homocystein, fibrin, vWF, CRP were measured from samples taken from carotid plaques converted into super- natant. SPSS for Windows 10.0 programme was used for statistical analysis. P value less than 0.05 was accepted significant. R Re es su ul lt ts s: : Homocystein value in symptomatic patients was4.036±1.19 µmol/L, in asymptomatic patients, was 3.647±0.772 µmol/L (p=0.519). Fibrin value in symptomatic patients was 227.54±38.81 mg/dl, in asymptomatic patients, was 88.26±5.93 mg/dl (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Pınar, A., KURDAL, A. T., ARSLAN, C., BOZKURT, A. K., DEMİRBAŞ, M., ÖZDEMİR, M. B. (2022). Semptomatik ve asemptomatik hastalarda karotid arter aterom plak içeriğinin karşılaştırılması. Damar Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 43–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/486783

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

Yeni Sekmede Aç ↗

↗Yeni Sekme

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

Ricci S, Flamini FO, Celani MG, et al. Preve-lance of internal carotid artery stenosis in subjects older than 49 year. Cerebrovascular Disease 1991;1:16-9. 2.Autret A, Saudeau D, Bertrand P, et al. Stroke risk in patients with carotid stenosis. Lancet 1987;1:888-91. 3.nzitari D, Eliasziw M, Gates P, et al. The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. N Eng J Med 2000;342:1693-700. 4.Zuber M, Mass JL. Epidemiologie des accidents vasculaires cerebreux. Rev Neurol 1992;148:245-55. 5.Zieglar DK, Zileli T, Dick A, et al. Correlation of bruits over the carotid artery with angiograp-hically demonstrated lesions. Neurology 1975; 91 -Rfin-c; 6.Gauthier JC, Rosa A, Lhermitte F. Carotid auscultation. Correlation in 200 patients with 332 angiograms. Rev Neurol 1975;131:175-84. 7.Barnes RW, Liebeman PR, Marszalek PB, et al. The natural history of asymptomatic carotid disease in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery 1981;90: 1075-83. 8.T.N. Sonechaa, K.T. Delisa. Predictive value of asymptomatic cervical bruit for carotid artery disease in coronary artery surgery revisited. Henein International Journal of Cardiology 2006;107:225-9. 9.Birincioglu L, Arda K, Bardakcl H, et al. Carotid disease in patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass: analysis of 678 patients. Angi-ology 1999;50:9-19. 10.Hankey GJ, Warlow CP. Symptomatic carotis ischaemic events: safest and most cost effective way of selecting patients for angiography, before carotid endarterectomy. R Med J 1990;300:1484-91. 11.Brener BJ, Brief DK, Alpert J, et al. The risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis undergoing cardiac surgery: a follow-up study. J Vase Surg 1987;5:269-79. 12.John R, Choudhri AF, Weinberg AD, et al. Multicenter review of preoperative risk factors for stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:30-6. 13.Suematsu Y, Nakano K, Sasako Y, et al. Strategies for CABG patients with carotid artery disease and perioperative neurological complications. Heart Vessels 2000;15:129-34. 14.Kusoffsky A, Apel I, Hirschfeld H. Reaching-lifting-placing task during standing after stroke: coordination among ground forces, ankle muscle activity, and hand movement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:650-60. 15.Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke 2001;32: 1279-84. 16.Busuttil RW, Baker JD, Davidson RK, et a