Dergiler / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Interobserver Variability and Stiffness Measurements of Normal Lacrimal Gland in Healthy People Using Shear Wave Elastography

Sayfa
93–98
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The standard stiffness values of the normal lacrimal gland obtained using shear wave elastography in this study may be used as reference data to distinguish the healthy tissues from the pathological tissues.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:BACKGROUND/AIMS To determine a reference data set for stiffness values of normal lacrimal gland using shear wave elastography and to evaluate the interobserver variability of these measurements.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:MATERIAL and METHODS A total of 50 participants (bilaterally 100 glands) comprising 25 females and 25 males, aged between 19 and 58 years, were included in this prospective study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The standard stiffness values of the normal lacrimal gland obtained using shear wave elastography in this study may be used as reference data to distinguish the healthy tissues from the pathological tissues.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS To determine a reference data set for stiffness values of normal lacrimal gland using shear wave elastography and to evaluate the interobserver variability of these measurements. MATERIAL and METHODS A total of 50 participants (bilaterally 100 glands) comprising 25 females and 25 males, aged between 19 and 58 years, were included in this prospective study. For each participant, we evaluated both lacrimal glands using grayscale and shear wave elastography, and the relationships with sex, age, and body mass index were determined. All lacrimal glands were evaluated by 2 independent observers blinded to each other. RESULTS The mean stiffness values of lacrimal glands for the 2 observers were 6.17±2.94 kPa and 6.00±3.10 kPa, respectively. In terms of stiffness values, there were no significant differences between the left and right lacrimal glands and between sexes (p>.05). Age exhibited a weak correlation with stiffness values (r=0.280, p=.005; r=0.284, p=.004). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the interobserver variability of the shear wave elastography measurements was 0.948 (95% confidence interval: 0.924-0.965). CONCLUSION The lacrimal gland can be quantitatively evaluated using shear wave elastography. Normal shear wave elastography values for the lacrimal gland in the healthy population included in this study were estimated to be 6.17±2.94 kPa. Operator dependency of this method is low, and interobserver compliance is high. The standard stiffness values of the normal lacrimal gland obtained using shear wave elastography in this study may be used as reference data to distinguish the healthy tissues from the pathological tissues.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞENDUR, H. N., CERİT, M. (2022). Interobserver Variability and Stiffness Measurements of Normal Lacrimal Gland in Healthy People Using Shear Wave Elastography. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 93–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/482171

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Hughes GK, Miszkiel KA. Imaging of the lacrimal gland. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2006
  2. 27(6): 476-91. [Crossref] 2. Jung WS, Ahn KJ, Park MR, Kim JY, Choi JJ, Kim BS, et al. The radiological spectrum of orbital pathologies that involve the lacrimal gland and the lacrimal fossa. Korean J Radiol 2007
  3. 8(4): 336-42. [Crossref] 3. Bilgili Y, Taner P, Unal B, Simsir I, Kara SA, Bayram M, et al. Doppler sonography of the normal lacrimal gland. J Clin Ultrasound 2005
  4. 33(3): 123-6. [Crossref] 4. Lorenzano D, Rose GE. The “Wedge Sign”: An Imaging Sign for Aggressive Lacrimal Gland Disease. Ophthalmology 2017
  5. 124(7): 1081-3. [Crossref] 5. Lecler A, Boucenna M, Lafitte F, Koskas P, Nau E, Jacomet PV, et al. Usefulness of colour Doppler flow imaging in the management of lacrimal gland lesions. Eur Radiol 2017
  6. 27(2): 779-89. [Crossref] 6. Giovagnorio F, Pace F, Giorgi A. Sonography of lacrimal glands in Sjögren syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 2000
  7. 19(8): 505-9. [Crossref] 7. Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK. Ultrasound Elastography: Review of Techniques and Clinical Applications. Theranostics 2017
  8. 7(5): 1303-29. [Crossref] 8. Taljanovic MS, Gimber LH, Becker GW, Latt LD, Klauser AS, Melville DM, et al. Shear-Wave Elastography: Basic Physics and Musculoskeletal Applications. Radiographics 2017
  9. 37(3): 855-70. [Crossref] 9. Caliskan E, Ozturk M, Bayramoglu Z, Comert RG, Adaletli I. Evaluation of parotid glands in healthy children and adolescents using shear wave elastography and superb microvascular imaging. Radiol Med 2018
  10. 123(9): 710-8. [Crossref] 10. Hu X, Liu Y, Qian L (2017) Diagnostic potential of real-time elastography (RTE) and shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 96: e8282. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008282 11. Mulazzani L, Salvatore V, Ravaioli F et al (2017) Point shear wave ultrasound elastography with Esaote compared to realtime 2D shear wave elastography with supersonic imagine for the quantifcation of liver stifness. J Ultrasound 20: 213-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-017-0260-7 12. Palabiyik FB, Inci E, Turkay R, Bas D (2017) Evaluation of liver, kidney, and spleen elasticity in healthy newborns and infants using shear wave elastography. J Ultrasound Med 36: 2039-45. [Crossref] 13. Bailey SS, Youssf M, Patel M, Hu HH, Shaibi GQ, Towbin RB (2017) Shear-wave ultrasound elastography of the liver in normal-weight an