KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Walking Speed Gender Differences in Prepubertal Children: An Observational Study

Shahin AHMEDOV
Figen YAMAN LESİNGER
Musa OYTUN
Barış FİLİZ
Fatih Kerem ÖZKAN
Sayfa
404–408
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

RESULTS: The preferred walking speed analysis demonstrated that the girls, despite their shorter height and age, moved faster than the boys (1.35±0.22 m/sec in boys. 1.43±0.22 m/sec in girls, p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:BACKGROUND/AIMS: Walking speed associates with a person’s functional status and balance confidence, both of which diminish with age.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The difference in children’s body composition and prepubertal metabolic rate suggested gender variability in their walking parameters.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:RESULTS: The preferred walking speed analysis demonstrated that the girls, despite their shorter height and age, moved faster than the boys (1.35±0.22 m/sec in boys. 1.43±0.22 m/sec in girls, p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Walking speed associates with a person’s functional status and balance confidence, both of which diminish with age. The difference in children’s body composition and prepubertal metabolic rate suggested gender variability in their walking parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The preferred step length, cadence, and overall walking speed of 457 school children (256 boys) aged 12.65±2.16 years old were assessed during a 20 meter walk. The participants’ height, weight, and heart rate values were also collected. RESULTS: The preferred walking speed analysis demonstrated that the girls, despite their shorter height and age, moved faster than the boys (1.35±0.22 m/sec in boys. 1.43±0.22 m/sec in girls, p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AHMEDOV, S., LESİNGER, F. Y., OYTUN, M., FİLİZ, B., ÖZKAN, F. K. (2022). Walking Speed Gender Differences in Prepubertal Children: An Observational Study. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 404–408. https://ajindex.com/articles/482139

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Bassett Jr DR, Toth LP, LaMunion SR, Crouter SE. Step counting: a review of measurement considerations and health-related applications. Sports Med. 2017; 47(7): 1303-15
  2. Shin SH, Chan GP. Adaptive step length estimation algorithm using optimal parameters and movement status awareness. Med Eng Phys. 2011; 33(9): 1064-71
  3. Sayeed T, Samã A, Catalã A, Rodríguez-Molinero A, Cabestany J. Adapted step length estimators for patients with Parkinson’s disease using a lateral belt worn accelerometer. Technol Health Care. 2015; 23(2): 179-94
  4. Pillay JD, van der Ploeg HP, Kolbe-Alexander TL, Proper KI, van Stralen M, Tomaz SA, et al. The association between daily steps and health, and the mediating role of body composition: a pedometer-based, cross-sectional study in an employed South African population. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15: 174
  5. Inoue S, Takamiya T, Yoshiike N, Shimomitsu T. Physical activity among the Japanese: results of the National Health and Nutrition Survey. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the International Congress on Physical Activity and Public Health; 2006 April 17–20; Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2006. p. 79
  6. Hunter JP, Marshall RN, McNair PJ. Interaction of step length and step rate during sprint running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(2): 261-71
  7. Collins SH, Kuo AD. Two independent contributions to step variability during over-ground human walking. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8): e73597
  8. Hatano Y. Use of the pedometer for promoting daily walking exercise. Int Counc Health Phys Educ Recreat J. 1993; 29(4): 4-8
  9. Winter DA. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Cait Posture. 1995; 3(4): 193-214
  10. Seeman E. Clinical review 137: Sexual dimorphism in skeletal size, density, and strength. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 86(10): 4576-84
  11. Frimenko R, Whitehead C. Do men and women walk differently? A review and meta-analysis of sex difference in non-pathological gait kinematics. United States Air Force Research Laboratory. 711th Human Performance Wing Interim research: 2014. p.11
  12. Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 1995; 26(6): 982-89
  13. Weyand PG, Smith BR, Schultz NS, Ludlow LW, Puyau MR, Nancy F Butte NF. Predicting metabolic rate across walking speed: one fit for all body sizes? J Appl Physiol. 2013; 115(9): 1332-42
  14. Studenski S, Perera S, Wallace D, Chandler JM, Duncan PW, Rooney E, et al.