Dergiler / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Readability of Turkish Websites on Obesity and Bariatric Surgery

Sayfa
41–45
Yayın Tarihi
2022-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Furthermore, it determined that these websites did not provide adequate information about bariatric surgery risks, adverse effects, and contraindications.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: This study aimed to investigate the readability levels and contents of Turkish websites on obesity and bariatric surgery.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: A search was performed in June 2019 with the words “obesity” and “bariatric surgery” in Google’s search engine.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Furthermore, it determined that these websites did not provide adequate information about bariatric surgery risks, adverse effects, and contraindications.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Obesity · Bariatric surgery · Readability

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the readability levels and contents of Turkish websites on obesity and bariatric surgery. Methods: A search was performed in June 2019 with the words “obesity” and “bariatric surgery” in Google’s search engine. We evaluated the websites on the first ten pages of Google’s search engine results. Commercial websites, advertisement websites, chat websites, forum websites, magazine websites, websites containing only images or videos, and websites with less than ten sentences were excluded. Ateşman and Bezirci Yılmaz’s readability formulas were used to analyze the readability level. Websites were evaluated in terms of content (definition, risk factors, complications, and treatment of obesity) and were divided into three groups (Group 1: hospitals and specialist physicians, Group 2: national news websites, and Group 3: other websites). Results: A total of 79 websites were evaluated. There were 43 (54.4%) websites in Group 1, 25 (31.6%) websites in Group 2, and 11 (13.9%) websites in Group 3. The readability level of all sites was ‘difficult,’ according to the Atesman readability formula, and at ‘undergraduate level,’ according to the Bezirci-Yılmaz readability formula. When the contents of these websites were examined, 51.9% contained a definition of obesity, 7.6% contained information on waist circumference, 12.7% contained obesity risk factors, and 43.0% contained obesity-related diseases. Conclusion: This study revealed that the readability level of Turkish websites on obesity and bariatric surgery was above the average literacy level of the Turkish people. Furthermore, it determined that these websites did not provide adequate information about bariatric surgery risks, adverse effects, and contraindications.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERYILMAZ, M., SOLAK, İ., AY, E., KOZANHAN, B. (2022). Evaluation of Readability of Turkish Websites on Obesity and Bariatric Surgery. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 41–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/481356

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Finnie RK, Felder TM, Linder SK, Mullen PD. Beyond reading level: a systematic review of the suitability of cancer education print and web-based materials. J Cancer Educ 2010;25:497-505
  2. Satman I, Yilmaz T, Sengül A, Salman S, Salman F, Uygur S, et al. Population-based study of diabetes and risk characteristics in Turkey: results of the turkish diabetes epidemiology study (TURDEP). Diabetes care 2002;25:1551-6
  3. Satman I, Omer B, Tutuncu Y, Kalaca S, Gedik S, Dinccag N, et al. Twelve-year trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes in Turkish adults. European journal of epidemiology. 2013;28(2):169-80
  4. Türkiye beslenme ve sağlık araştırması 2010: Beslenme durumu ve alışkanlıklarının değerlendirilmesi sonuç raporu. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Beslenme ve Diyetetik Bölümü Sağlık Araştırmaları Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara. 2014
  5. Cheng C, Dunn M. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information. Australian and New Zealand journal of public health. 2015;39(4):309-14
  6. Wolfe BM, Kvach E, Eckel RH. Treatment of Obesity: Weight Loss and Bariatric Surgery. Circulation research. 2016;118(11):1844-55
  7. Arterburn DE, Courcoulas AP. Bariatric surgery for obesity and metabolic conditions in adults. Bmj. 2014;349:g3961
  8. Mihmanli M, Işil RG, İdiz UO. Bariyatrik Cerrahi Sonuçlarına Genel Bakış. Turkiye Klinikleri General Surgery-Special Topics. 2015;8(3):6-11
  9. Solak M. Kolorektal Kanser Hakkında Bilgi İçeren İnternet Sitelerinin Okunabilirliği. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;16(3):509-13
  10. Eker L, Tüzün EH, Aytar A, Daşkapan A. Fizik tedavi ve rehabilitasyon kliniklerinde kullanılan sağlık eğitim materyallerinin okunabilirlik düzeyi
  11. Boztaş N, Özbilgin Ş, Öçmen E, Altuntaş G, Özkardeşler S, Hancı V, et al. Evaluating the readibility of informed consent forms available before anaesthesia: a comparative study. Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation. 2014;42(3):140
  12. Köse EÖ. Biyoloji 9 Ders Kitabında Hücre ile İlgili Metinlerin Okunabilirlik Düzeleri. Cankaya University Journal of Law. 2009;12(2):141-50
  13. Bezirci B, Yılmaz A. A software library for measurement of readability of texts and a new readability metric for Turkish. DEÜ FMD. 2010;12(3):49-62
  14. Ateşman E. Measuring readability in Turkish. AU Tömer Language Journal. 1997;58:171-4
  15. Walsh TM, Volsko TA. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer he