Dergiler / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Informed Consent in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Cross- Sectional Study

Sayfa
683–690
Yayın Tarihi
2022-09-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

While middle-aged physicians (30 –45 age) thought that patients should not be informed about the risk of radiation causing cancer, experienced participants (45 age and above) stated that information should be given about the cancer risk (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: This study assessed the opinions and attitudes of dentomaxillofacial (DMF) radiology physicians worldwide about informed consent in terms of oral radiology applications.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The Pearson chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for statistical analysis Results: From 22 countries, 46 male (51.7%) and 43 female (48.3%) DMR radiology physicians completed the questionnaire.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:While middle-aged physicians (30 –45 age) thought that patients should not be informed about the risk of radiation causing cancer, experienced participants (45 age and above) stated that information should be given about the cancer risk (p
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Dental radiology · informed consent · ethics

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed the opinions and attitudes of dentomaxillofacial (DMF) radiology physicians worldwide about informed consent in terms of oral radiology applications. Methods: DMF radiology physicians in various countries were invited to this study via e-mail. The participants answered their demographic information (gender, age, years of experience, title, institution, and country), and questions about informed consent. The Pearson chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for statistical analysis Results: From 22 countries, 46 male (51.7%) and 43 female (48.3%) DMR radiology physicians completed the questionnaire. More than half of the participants (53.9%) were working in the university hospital, and the highest number of participants (32.6%) was from the European region. Most of the surveyors (70.8%) stated that consent is required in dental radiology. No statistically significant difference was found in the radiographic methods (intraoral, panoramic/extraoral, and cone-beam CT) applied in terms of obtaining consent (p > 0.05). While middle-aged physicians (30 –45 age) thought that patients should not be informed about the risk of radiation causing cancer, experienced participants (45 age and above) stated that information should be given about the cancer risk (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKAY, G., ÖZDEDE, M., KARADAĞ, Ö. (2022). Informed Consent in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Cross- Sectional Study. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 683–690. https://ajindex.com/articles/481082

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Carpeggiani C, Picano E. The radiology informed consent form: recommendations from the European Society of Cardiology position paper. J Radiol Prot 2016;36:175–186.
  2. Kakar H, Gambhir RS, Singh S, Kaur A, Nanda T. Informed consent: corner stone in ethical medical and dental practice. J Family Med Prim Care 2014;3:68–71.
  3. Harorlı A, Çaglayan F. Diş hekimliği radyolojisinde aydınlatılmış onam. Turk Klin Oral Maxillofac Rad Special Topics 2019;5:57–68.
  4. Doudenkova V, Pipon JCB. Duty to inform and informed consent in diagnostic radiology: how ethics and law can better guide practice. HEC Forum 2016;28:75–94.
  5. Hadley LC, Watson T. The radiographers’ role in information giving prior to consent for computed tomography scans: A cross-sectional survey. Radiography 2016;22:252–257. Wright B. Contemporary medico-legal dental radiology. Aust Dent J. 2012;57:9–15.
  6. Akay G, Ozdede M, Karadag O. The perceptions and attitudes of Dentomaxillofacial radiologists towards informed consent. Yeditepe J Dent 2021;17:123–127. Geist JR. Informed refusal in oral and maxillofacial radiology: Does it exist? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2018;125:A8–A10. Kurt E, Turker T. The evaluation of dentists’ views about informed consent who works in university hospital. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2015;18:56–70.
  7. Karsli T, Kalra MK, Self JL, Rosenfeld JA, Butler S, Simoneaux S. What physicians think about the need for informed consent for communicating the risk of cancer from low-dose radiation. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39:917–925.
  8. Younger CWE, Douglas C, Warren-Forward H. Ionizing radiation risk disclosure: when should radiographers assume a duty to inform? Radiography (Lond) 2018;24:146–150.
  9. Semelka RC, Armao DM, Elias J Jr, Picano E. The information imperative: is it time for an informed consent process explaining the risks of medical radiation? Radiology 2012;262:15–18.
  10. Baheti AD, Thakur MH, Jankharia B. Informed consent in diagnostic radiology practice: Where do we stand? Indian J Radiol Imaging 2017;27:517–520.
  11. Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 2004;231:393–398.
  12. Cardinal JS, Gunderman RB, Tarver RD. Informing patients about risks and benefits of radiology examinations: a review article. J Am Coll Radiol 2011;8:402–408.
  13. Brown N, Jones L. Knowledge of medical imaging radiation dose and risk among doctors. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2013;57:8–14. Younger CW