KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Cumhuriyet Science Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of weighted least squares and robust estimation in structural equation modeling of ordinal categorical data with larger sample sizes

Cengiz GAZELOĞLU
Zerrin AŞAN GREENACRE
Sayfa
193–211
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Moreover, it was detected that there is almost no difference between the two methods for sample sizes over 3000.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The effect of different sample sizes on estimation methods such as weighted least squares and robust weighted least squares that are used in structural equation modeling was studied and compared using information criteria such as Akaike Information Criteria in this study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The simulations were repeated 1000 times with two estimation methods and the average values of criteria were calculated with different sample sizes.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Moreover, it was detected that there is almost no difference between the two methods for sample sizes over 3000.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The effect of different sample sizes on estimation methods such as weighted least squares and robust weighted least squares that are used in structural equation modeling was studied and compared using information criteria such as Akaike Information Criteria in this study. The simulations were repeated 1000 times with two estimation methods and the average values of criteria were calculated with different sample sizes. The study includes a construct of four factors, with four questions of each that are measured on a five-point Likert scale. Different sample sizes, ranging from 300 to 5000 were selected. According to the simulations results, it is concluded that the robust estimation method provides more effective results at lower sample size. In addition, it was found that as the sample size increases, the efficiency difference between two methods gradually decreases. Moreover, it was detected that there is almost no difference between the two methods for sample sizes over 3000.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GAZELOĞLU, C., GREENACRE, Z. A. (2022). Comparison of weighted least squares and robust estimation in structural equation modeling of ordinal categorical data with larger sample sizes. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 193–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/477698

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (19)

  1. Agresti A., Categorical Data Analysis, Second edition, John Wiley Sons, 2003
  2. Edward C., Wirht R.J., Houts C.R. and Xi N., Categorical Data in The Structural Equation Modeling Framework. Hoyle RH. (Ed.) Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press, 2012;. 195-208
  3. Arıcıgil Ç., Sosyal Bilimlerde Kategorik Verilerle İlişki Analizi, (Second Edition), Ankara, Pegem Akademi, 2013
  4. Kateri M., Contingency Table Analysis Methods and Implementation Using R, New York, Springer, 2014
  5. Agresti A., Booth J.G., Hobert J.P. and Caffo B., Random-Effects modeling of Categorical Response Data. Sociological Methodology., 30 (2000) 27-80
  6. Akıncı E.D., Yapısal eşitlik modellerinde bilgi kriterleri, Doctoral Thesis, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, 2007
  7. Schumacker R.E. and Lomax R.G., A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling, Third edition, Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, LLC 2010
  8. Likert R., A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, New York University 1932
  9. Lee S.Y., Structural Equation Modeling A Bayesian Approach, England, John Wiley Sons, 2007
  10. Arslan M.S.T., Ordinal değişkenli yapısal eşitlik modellerinde kullanılan parametre tahmin yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması, Master Thesis, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, 2011
  11. Jörekog K.G. and Sörbom D., LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modelling with the Simples Command Language, Scientific Sofware International, 1993
  12. Kline R.B., Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling, London, Guilford Press, 2011
  13. Kline R.B., Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling, London, Guilford Press, 2005
  14. Schumacker R.E. and Lomax R.G., A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling, Second edition, Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004
  15. Çelik H.E., Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ve bir uygulama: genişletilmiş online alışveriş kabul modeli, Doctoral Thesis, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir Osman Gazi Üniversitesi, Eskişehir, 2009
  16. Agresti A., Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data, John Wiley Sons, 2010
  17. Bollen K.A., Structural Equation with Latent Variables, New York, John Wiley Sons, 1989
  18. Çelik H.E., Yılmaz V., LISREL 9.1 ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi, Ankara, Anı Yayıncılık, 2013
  19. Muthén B. O., A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psycho