Dergiler / lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education / 2019 / Sayı: 40

DETERMINATION OF THERMAL TOURISM POTENTIAL IN KARAHAYIT, DENIZLI: A STUDY ON LOCAL TOURISTS

Sayfa
266–282
Yayın Tarihi
2019-07-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

By this way, the region will become more attractive, the satisfaction level of the visitors will increase and at the same time the people of the region will be able to earn more.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Karahayıt is located in Turkey's southwest within the borders of Denizli.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The second dimension, on the other hand, is the questionnaire conducted with 150 samples (voluntarily) participating in the study from the local tourist population visiting Karahayıt.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:By this way, the region will become more attractive, the satisfaction level of the visitors will increase and at the same time the people of the region will be able to earn more.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2010 · 150 samples
⚙️Değişkenler:Thermal Tourism · Karahayıt · Denizli

Özet

Karahayıt is located in Turkey's southwest within the borders of Denizli. It is one of the rapidly growing tourism centers with its proximity to Denizli province and Pamukkale, a world-famous tourism center located in the region, as well as its hot water, thermal springs, healing mud, and "Red Water" which has spread out of the country in recent years. In this study, the thermal tourism potential of Karahayıt (Denizli) and the tourists’ views about thermal tourism were evaluated. In the questionnaire, which was outlined according to the screening model, the general screening was carried out in two dimensions. The first one is the documentary screening model on the determination of natural and human elements that constitute the thermal tourism potential of Karahayıt research area. The second dimension, on the other hand, is the questionnaire conducted with 150 samples (voluntarily) participating in the study from the local tourist population visiting Karahayıt. In this scope, the related literature and the questionnaire developed by Çetin (2010) were used as the data collection tools. In addition, field studies, field inspections, and interviews were conducted with the locals to obtain the research data. The data obtained from the related literature, field studies and field inspections were examined using descriptive analysis method, while statistical techniques were used in the analysis of the survey data. As a result of the study, it is seen that Karahayıt thermal field has an important potential in terms of thermal tourism. According to the data obtained from the local tourists, the majority (70%) take into account the characteristics of thermal water and the advice the relatives / friends in choosing the facility; they come to Karahayıt because they believe that thermal is beneficial to health (42%), thinks that they are treated rheumatism (28.7%) and joint disorder (13.3%), they are satisfied with the thermal facility (58%) and advice thermal facility which they stayed (55%). However, more than half of the local tourists (62%) believe that the promotion of the region was not sufficient, the social activities carried out in thermal facilities were limited (58%) and the infrastructure in the thermal facilities was insufficient (54%). In Karahayıt, it is necessary to build high quality thermal facilities and to create new areas and activities for recreation. By this way, the region will become more attractive, the satisfaction level of the visitors will increase and at the same time the people of the region will be able to earn more.

Abstract

Karahayıt is located in Turkey's southwest within the borders of Denizli. It is one of the rapidly growing tourism centers with its proximity to Denizli province and Pamukkale, a world-famous tourism center located in the region, as well as its hot water, thermal springs, healing mud, and "Red Water" which has spread out of the country in recent years. In this study, the thermal tourism potential of Karahayıt (Denizli) and the tourists’ views about thermal tourism were evaluated. In the questionnaire, which was outlined according to the screening model, the general screening was carried out in two dimensions. The first one is the documentary screening model on the determination of natural and human elements that constitute the thermal tourism potential of Karahayıt research area. The second dimension, on the other hand, is the questionnaire conducted with 150 samples (voluntarily) participating in the study from the local tourist population visiting Karahayıt. In this scope, the related literature and the questionnaire developed by Çetin (2010) were used as the data collection tools. In addition, field studies, field inspections, and interviews were conducted with the locals to obtain the research data. The data obtained from the related literature, field studies and field inspections were examined using descriptive analysis method, while statistical techniques were used in the analysis of the survey data. As a result of the study, it is seen that Karahayıt thermal field has an important potential in terms of thermal tourism. According to the data obtained from the local tourists, the majority (70%) take into account the characteristics of thermal water and the advice the relatives / friends in choosing the facility; they come to Karahayıt because they believe that thermal is beneficial to health (42%), thinks that they are treated rheumatism (28.7%) and joint disorder (13.3%), they are satisfied with the thermal facility (58%) and advice thermal facility which they stayed (55%). However, more than half of the local tourists (62%) believe that the promotion of the region was not sufficient, the social activities carried out in thermal facilities were limited (58%) and the infrastructure in the thermal facilities was insufficient (54%). In Karahayıt, it is necessary to build high quality thermal facilities and to create new areas and activities for recreation. By this way, the region will become more attractive, the satisfaction level of the visitors will increase and at the same time the people of the region will be able to earn more.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞANLI, C., KARA, H. (2019). DETERMINATION OF THERMAL TOURISM POTENTIAL IN KARAHAYIT, DENIZLI: A STUDY ON LOCAL TOURISTS. lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education, Sayı: 40, 266–282. https://ajindex.com/articles/47441

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Akat, Ö. (2003). Pazarlama Ağırlıklı Turizm İşletmeciliği. İstanbul:
  2. Ekin Kitabevi.
  3. Akbulut, G. (2010). Türkiye’de kaplıca turizmi ve sorunları. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1) 35-54.
  4. Aymankuy, Y., Akgül, V. & Akgül Can, C. (2012). Termal konaklama işletmelerinde müşteri memnuniyetine etki eden unsurlar “Gönen Kaplıcaları örneği, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(28), 223-240.
  5. Barut, İ. F., Erdoğan, N., Berköz Erol, B. & Güneri Demircioğlu, F. (2013). Geçmişten günümüze denizli termal mineralli sularının hidrokimyasal özellikleri ile kullanımının değerlendirilmesi. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 26(1), 1-26.
  6. Belge, R. (2018). Denizli kent kimliğini oluşturan coğrafi öğeler. Ege Coğrafya Dergisi 27(2), 167-181.
  7. Boekstein, M. (2014). Tourism, health and the changing role of thermal springs- should South Africa reposition its thermal spring tourism product? African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 3(2) 1-9.
  8. Bulut, İ. & Girgin, M. (2001). Bingöl Kös kaplıcalarının coğrafî etüdü. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 5, 59-81.
  9. Çetin, T. (2010). Termal Turizmin Başkenti Afyonkarahisar. Ankara:
  10. Beyazkalem Yayıncılık. Çetin, T. (2011). Termal turizm potansiyeli açısından kozaklı (Nevşehir) kaplıcaları. Turkish Studies, 6(1), 878-902.
  11. Cooper-Erfurt, P. (2010). The Importance of Natural Geothermal Resources in Tourism. Bali: Proceedings World Geothermal Congress. Deniz, M. (2016). Termal turizm açısından Kayaağıl termal tesisleri (Uşak). Tarih Okulu Dergisi, 9(25), 311-349.
  12. Denizli Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2019). 08 Ocak 2019 tarihinde http://www.denizli.bel.tr/Default.aspx?k=fotograf-galerisi&id=11295, adresinden edinilmiştir. Denizli İl Kültür ve Turizm Müdürlüğü (2019) 04 Ocak 2019 tarihinde http://www.pamukkale.gov.tr/tr/Konaklama-Yeme-Icme/-Karahayit-Ksb-Bld-Belgeli-Oteller, adresinden edinilmiştir. Denizli İl Kültür ve Turizm Müdürlüğü (2019). 06 Ocak 2019 tarihinde http://www.pamukkale.gov.tr/tr/Konaklama-Yeme-Icme/Karahayit-Ksb-Pansiyonlar, adresinden edinilmiştir. Dilsiz, C. (1998).
  13. Pamukkale, Karahayıt ve Aşağı Çürüksu Ovası (Denizli) sıcak ve mineralli su kaynaklarının hidrokimyasal incelemesi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi,
  14. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara). Doğanay, H. & Zaman, S. (2016). Türkiye Turizm Coğrafyası. Ankara:
  15. Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  16. Doğaner, S. (2001). Türkiye Turizm Coğrafyası. (1. Baskı). İstanbul:
  17. Çantay Kitabevi.
  18. Göçmen, G.Z. (2008). Turizm çeşitlendirmesi kapsamınd