Dergiler / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Surgical Teams’ Attitudes and Views Concerning the Surgical Safety ChecklistTR

Sayfa
410–419
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is recommended that regular trainings with the active participation of all team members to ensure the effective use of the checklist.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: This study was conducted to determine the surgical team members’ views and attitudes concerning the Surgical Safety ChecklistTurkey (SSCTR).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: This descriptive-cross-sectional study was conducted in nine education and research hospitals in Istanbul with 561 surgical clinic and operating room nurses, surgeons, anesthetists, and anesthetic technicians.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is recommended that regular trainings with the active participation of all team members to ensure the effective use of the checklist.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:surgical safety checklist · patient safety · safe surgery

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to determine the surgical team members’ views and attitudes concerning the Surgical Safety ChecklistTurkey (SSCTR). Methods: This descriptive-cross-sectional study was conducted in nine education and research hospitals in Istanbul with 561 surgical clinic and operating room nurses, surgeons, anesthetists, and anesthetic technicians. Data were collected using an information form to determine the demographic and professional characteristics of surgical team members, their attitudes and views concerning SSCTR. Results: According to the participants’ responses, the use of SSCTR was compulsory in the institution of 98% of the participants, 95.2% believed that this checklist should be used for each patient because it was effective in preventing complications, and 78.4% considered that it increased patient safety, but only 57.8% reported that SSCTR was routinely used in daily practice. Although the participants who had received training on SSCTR comprised 69% of the sample, 50.8% thought that training meetings were not beneficial. The rate of compliance was the lowest for SSCTR item “Team members' introducing themselves” (32.7%) and the highest for “Confirmation of identity, surgery type, and surgical site of the patient” (95.3%). Conclusion: The study findings showed that SSCTR was not used regularly in half of the patients. It is recommended that regular trainings with the active participation of all team members to ensure the effective use of the checklist.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GURKAN, A., AYDIN, Y. D., KIRTIL, İ. (2022). Surgical Teams’ Attitudes and Views Concerning the Surgical Safety ChecklistTR. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 410–419. https://ajindex.com/articles/474138

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Santana HT, Rodrigues MCS, Evangelista MSN. Surgical teams’ attitudes and opinions towards the safety of surgical procedures in public hospitals in the Brazilian Federal District. BMC Res Notes 2016;9:276
  2. Nepogodiev D, Martin J, Biccard B, Makupe A, Bhangu A. Global burden of postoperative death. The Lancet 2019;393:401
  3. McDowell DS, McComb SA. Safety checklist briefings: a systematic review of the literature. AORN 2014;99(1):125-137
  4. Treadwell JR, Lucas S, Tsou AY. Surgical checklist: a systematic review of impacts and implementation. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:299-318
  5. Ridrigo-Rincon I, Martin-Vizcaino MP, Tirapu-Leon B, ZabalzaLopez P, Zaballos-Barcala N, Villalgordo-Ordin P, Abad-Vicente FJ, Gost-Garde J. The effects of surgical checklist on morbidity and mortality: a pre – and post-intervention study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2015;59(2):205-214
  6. Alizadeha M, Bayramia HJ, Baradarana M, Gargarib RM, Azhoughc R. Opinions of anesthesiologists and surgeons about World Health Organization surgical safety checklist in a tertiary hospital in Iran, 2012. J Clin Res Gov 2013;2:56
  7. Stahel PF, Sabel AL, Victoroff MS, Varnell J, Lembitz A, Boyle DJ, Clarke TJ, Smith WR, Mehler PS. Wrong-site and wrongpatient procedures in the universal protocol era: analysis of a prospective database of physician self-reported occurrences. Arch Surg 2010;145(10):978-984
  8. Bliss LA, Ross-Richardson CB, Sanzari LJ, Shapiro DS, Lukianoff AE, Bernstein BA, Ellner SJ. Thirty-day outcomes support implementation of a surgical safety checklist. J Am Coll Surg 2012;215(6):766-776
  9. Eappen S, Lane BH, Rosenberg B, Lipsitz SA, Sadoff D, Matheson D, Berry WR, Lester M, Gawande AA. Relationship between occurrence of surgical complications and hospital finances. JAMA 2013;309(15):1599-1606
  10. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AHS, Dellinger EP. Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist-based surgical safety intervention. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:102-107
  11. Ahmed K, Khan N, Khan MS, Dasgupta P. Development and content validation of a surgical safety checklist for operating theatres that use robotic technology. BJU Intern 2013;111:1161-1174
  12. Pugel AE, Simianu VV, Flum DR, Dellinger EP. Use of the surgical safety checklist to improve communication and reduce complications. J Infect Public Health 2015;8(3):219-225
  13. Binazir MB, Alizadeh M, Nikosa P,