Dergiler / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of the Host Based Intrusion Detection Systems and Network Based Intrusion Detection Systems

Sayfa
23–32
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is asserted that in order to have a better assurance for APT attacks there should be set up a Hybrid IDS approach covering both networks and hosts using both signature and behavioral detection mechanism based on machine learning.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Recently, Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) has emerged as sophisticated and tailor-made attacks.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:APTs pose threats mainly targeting institutions such as military, defense and security infrastructure, high profile companies and governments etc.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is asserted that in order to have a better assurance for APT attacks there should be set up a Hybrid IDS approach covering both networks and hosts using both signature and behavioral detection mechanism based on machine learning.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Intrusion detection systems · Host based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) · Network based Intrusion detection systems (NIDS)

Abstract

Recently, Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) has emerged as sophisticated and tailor-made attacks. APTs pose threats mainly targeting institutions such as military, defense and security infrastructure, high profile companies and governments etc. Particularly as a counter measure for APT attacks done by hactivists and cyber warriors and cyber terrorists over government institutions and e-government applications intrusion detection mechanisms are of crucial importance in effective defense. In this study, Intrusion detection and prevention systems have been studied in detail after being referred to the tasks and abilities of the intrusion detection systems that are at the core of the computer security technology presented today in order to meet the increasing need for information and network security. This paper’s aim is the specifying the differences between Host Based Intrusion Detection Systems (HIDS) and Network Based Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) and compares the tools which are using HIDS and NIDS. It is asserted that in order to have a better assurance for APT attacks there should be set up a Hybrid IDS approach covering both networks and hosts using both signature and behavioral detection mechanism based on machine learning.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Efe, A., Abacı, İ. N. (2022). Comparison of the Host Based Intrusion Detection Systems and Network Based Intrusion Detection Systems. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 23–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/472070

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. . Bahman Nikkhahan, Akbar Jangi Aghdam, and Sahar Sohrabi, “E-government security: A honeynet approach”, International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Volume 5, April, 2009 http://www.sersc.org/journals/IJAST/vol5/5.pdf [2]. Niva Das, Tanmoy Sarkar, “Survey on Host and Network Based Intrusion Detection System” Department of Information Technology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata Email: [email protected] Int. J. Advanced Networking and Applications Volume: 6 Issue: 2 Pages: 2266-2269 (2014) ISSN: 0975-0290 [3]. Yousef Farhaoui, Ahmed Asimi, “Creating a Complete Model of an Intrusion Detection System effective on the LAN” (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2012 [4]. Zhitian Zhou, Congyang Hu, “Study on the E-government Security Risk Management”, International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, VOL.8 No.5, May 2008 Manuscript received May 5, 2008 Manuscript revised May 20, 2008 [5]. Wallner R., Intrusion Detection Systems, 2007, http://www.kiv.zcu.cz/~ledvina/DHT/tugraz/IDS.pdf [6]. S. Young and D. Aitel, The hacker’s handbook: the strategy behind breaking into and defending networks. CRC Press, 2003. [7]. K. Timm, “Strategies to reduce false positives and false negatives in nids,” Tech. Rep., Access Date 10 Oct, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.symantec.com/connect/articles/strategies-reduce-false-positives-and-false-negatives-nids. [8]. K. Julisch and M. Dacier, “Mining intrusion detection alarms for actionable knowledge,” in Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining-KDD 02. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2002. [9]. T. Chyssler, St. Burschka, M. Semling, T. Lingvall and K. Burbeck, “Alarm Reduction and Correlation in Intrusion Detection Systems” http://www.ida.liu.se/labs/rtslab/publications/2004/Chyssler04_DIMVA.pdf [10]. W. Yang, W. Wan, L. Guo and L.J. Zhang, “An Efficient Intrusion Detection Model Based on Fast Inductive Learning”, Internation Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics. [11]. D. Xuetao, J. Chunfu and Y. Fu, “A Typical Set Method of Intrusion Detection Technology Based on Computer Audit Data”, International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security. [12]. J. Pikoulas, W. Buchanan, M. Mannion and K. Triantafylopoulos, “An Intelligent Agent Security Intrusion System”, 9th Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Syst