KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Aquatic Sciences and Engineering / 2022 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

Seasonal Distribution of Ephemeroptera (Insecta) Fauna and Relationship Among Physicochemical Parameters in the Ceyhan Basin

Selda ÖZTÜRK
Muzaffer DÜGEL
Erdoğan ÇİÇEK
Sayfa
105–118
Yayın Tarihi
2022-01-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ca-nonical correspondence analysis was applied to reveal the relationships between Ephemeroptera taxa and physicochemical parameters.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was carried out in 20 different localities in the spring, summer and autumn periods in 2019 in order to determine the Ephemeroptera fauna of the Ceyhan Basin and to reveal its relation-ship with some physicochemical parameters.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As a result, 971 specimens were examined and 17 species belonging to six families were identified.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ca-nonical correspondence analysis was applied to reveal the relationships between Ephemeroptera taxa and physicochemical parameters.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019 · 971 specimens
⚙️Değişkenler:Ephemeroptera · Ceyhan Basin · diversity

Abstract

This study was carried out in 20 different localities in the spring, summer and autumn periods in 2019 in order to determine the Ephemeroptera fauna of the Ceyhan Basin and to reveal its relation-ship with some physicochemical parameters. As a result, 971 specimens were examined and 17 species belonging to six families were identified. There is no data on the given taxa in the Ceyhan basin so all taxa are new records for the Ceyhan Basin. According to the Shannon-Wiener (H) diver-sity index, the highest and lowest diversity values were determined, respectively, in the spring at stations 7th (1.456) and 6th (0.173), in the summer at stations 20th (1.311) and 13th (0.341), and in the autumn at stations 15th (1.102) and 8th (0.457). According to Evenness (E) values, the most homoge-neous stations are the 3rd (0.963), 7th (0.973) and 1st (0.945) stations in the same seasonal order, and the stations with the least homogeneity are the 16th (0.529), 16th (0.659) and 8th (0.527) stations. Ac-cording to cluster analyses, the highest similarities were observed between stations 3rd and 5th in addition to stations 9th,14th,17th,18th and 19th with 100% percentage. Based on the physicochemical parameters measured in accordance with the Surface Water Quality Regulation, the water quality classes of the stations were in high quality water (Class I) and less contaminated (Class II) water. Ca-nonical correspondence analysis was applied to reveal the relationships between Ephemeroptera taxa and physicochemical parameters.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZTÜRK, S., DÜGEL, M., ÇİÇEK, E. (2022). Seasonal Distribution of Ephemeroptera (Insecta) Fauna and Relationship Among Physicochemical Parameters in the Ceyhan Basin. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 105–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/465602

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Aksoy, S. (2019). Mezitler (Bozüyük-Bilecik) bölgesinin akarsu kaynaklarındaki Gammaridae ve Ephemeroptera tür çeşitliliği ile su kirliliği arasındaki ilişkinin saptanması. Eskişehir Anadolu Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 75s. google scholar Allan, J.D. (1995). Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. Chapman and Hall (pp. 388). London. [CrossRef] google scholar Ayas, R., & Kara, C. (2014). Deliçay (Kahramanmaras)’ın makroinvertebrat faunasının mevsimsel dağılımı. Yunus Arastırma Bülteni, (4), 47-55. [CrossRef] google scholar Aydınlı, C. (2008). Sultansuyu Çayı (Malatya)’nın Ephemeroptera (Insecta) limnofaunası. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 89s. google scholar Aydınlı, C. (2013). Sultansuyu Çayı (Malatya)’nın Ephemeroptera (Insecta) limnofaunası. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 3(1), 9-14. google scholar Bakioğlu, B. (2019). Boğa Çayı (Antalya)’nın Ephemeroptera faunası ve su kalitesi ile ilişkisi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 91s. google scholar Bargos, T., Mesanza, J.M., Basaguren, A., & Orive, E. (1990). Assessing river water quality by means of multifactorial methods using macroinvertebrates: a comparative study of main watercourses of Biscay. Water Research, 24, 1-10. [CrossRef] google scholar Bauernfeind, E. (1994). Bestimmungsschlüssel für die österreichischen Eintagsfliegen (Insecta: Ephemeroptera). Teil 1, Wasser und Abwasser, 4(94), 1-92. google scholar Bauernfeind, E. (1995). Bestimmungsschlüssel für die österreichischen Eintagsfliegen (Insecta: Ephemeroptera). Teil 2, Wasser und Abwasser, 5(94), 1-96. google scholar Bauernfeind, E., & Humpesch, U.H. (2001). Die Eintagsfliegen Zentraleuropas - Bestimmung und Ökologie, Verlag des Naturhistorischen Museums, (pp. 240). Wien google scholar Bauernfeind, E., & Soldan, T. (2012). The mayflies of Europe (Ephemeroptera). Apollo Books. Aamosen 1, DK-5762, Denmark. [CrossRef] google scholar Bauernfeind, E., Moog, O., & Weichselbaumer, P. (2002). Ephemeroptera. In: Moog, O. (ed.): fauna aquatica austriaca, lieferung 2002, wasserwirtschaftskataster, bundesministerium für land- und forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft. Wien. google scholar Braasch, D., & Jacob, U. (1976). Die Verwendung von Ephemeroptera (Insecta) in der DDR als ındikatoren für die wassergüte. Entomologische Nachrichten, 20, 101-111. google scholar Buffagni, A. & Cazzola, M., Lopez-Rodrîguez, M.J., Alba-Tercedor, J., & Armanini, D.G. (2009). Distribution and ecolo