Dergiler / Balkan Medical Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4

A Comparison of Sexual Function, Psychological Status, and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Turkish Men within Polygamous and Monogamous Marriages

Sayfa
383–389
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Additionally, studies that address the perspectives of offspring and women's expectations within polygamous marriages should be conducted

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: A limited number of studies within the litera-ture have entailed objective evaluations of psychological, sexual, and emotional features of women within polyga-mous marriages.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:However, there is a lack of studies report-ing these features among polygamous and monogamous men.Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate sociodemo-graphic characteristics, sexual function, and psychological status of polygamously and monogamously married men.Study Design: Cross-sectional study.Methods: The study sample comprised two groups: 35 polygamous and 45 monogamous men in Kahramanmaraş Province, Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Additionally, studies that address the perspectives of offspring and women's expectations within polygamous marriages should be conducted
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background: A limited number of studies within the litera-ture have entailed objective evaluations of psychological, sexual, and emotional features of women within polyga-mous marriages. However, there is a lack of studies report-ing these features among polygamous and monogamous men.Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate sociodemo-graphic characteristics, sexual function, and psychological status of polygamously and monogamously married men.Study Design: Cross-sectional study.Methods: The study sample comprised two groups: 35 polygamous and 45 monogamous men in Kahramanmaraş Province, Turkey. Door-to-door surveys covered sociode-mographic factors and adopted Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and International Index of Erectile Function - Erec-tile Function Domain (IIEF-EFD) scales.Results: Polygamous men showed considerably higher IIEF-EFD scores (p0.05). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of monogamous men for erectile dysfunction and depression were 14.4 (95% CI: 3.1-67.5) and 7.4 (95% CI: 0.9-61.9), respectively. The main reasons for multiple marriages re-ported by polygamous men, in descending order, were: 1) decreased satisfaction of sexual desires by a wife (37.1%); 2) falling in love with the second wife (22.8%); and 3) in-compatibility with the first wife (17.1%). However, 62.9% of them responded negatively to the question: "Would you recommend polygamous marriage to other men?"Conclusion: Our results showed that polygamous men had higher erectile function and lower depression scores than monogamous men. Further studies investigating the effects of polygamy on men's psychosexual function are war-ranted. Additionally, studies that address the perspectives of offspring and women's expectations within polygamous marriages should be conducted

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EKERBİÇER, H. Ç., KÜÇÜKDURMAZ, F., BENLİOĞLU, C., RESİM, S., EFE, E., ALTUNÖREN, Ö., BAHAR, M. R. (2022). A Comparison of Sexual Function, Psychological Status, and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Turkish Men within Polygamous and Monogamous Marriages. Balkan Medical Journal, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4, 383–389. https://ajindex.com/articles/461326

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Al-Krenawi A, Slonim-Nevo V. Psychosocial and familial func- tioning of children from polygynous and monogamous families. J Soc Psychol 2008;148:745-64. [Crossref] Al-Krenawi A, Graham JR. Helping Professional practice with indigenous peoples: The Bedouin-Arab case. Lanham, MD: University Press of America; 2009. Brooks T. The problem with polygamy. Philosophical Topics 2009;37:109-22. [Crossref] Olley BO. Predictors of Hazardous and Harmful Alcohol Use among Nigerian Freshmen. African J Med Sci 2004;33:327-33.
  2. Read N. "The hidden wives of Turkey". BBC News 2005-08-30. Accessed 2014-09-16. Al-Krenawi A. Family therapy with a multiparental/multi- spousal family. Family Process 1998;37:65-82. [Crossref] Basker M, Moses PD, Russell S, Swamidhas P, Russell S. The psychometric properties of Beck Depression Inventory for ado- lescent depression in a primary-care paediatric setting in India. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2007;1:1-7. [Crossref] Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997;49:822-30. [Crossref] Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, Mishra A, Osterloh IH. Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the In- ternational Index of Erectile Function. Urology 1999;54:346- 51. [Crossref] White DR, Betzig L, Borgerhoff Mulder M, Chick G, Hartung J, Irons W, et al. Rethinking polygyny: co-wives, codes, and cultural systems (includes comments and author's reply). Curr Anthropol 1988;29:529-72. [Crossref] Marlowe FW. The mating system of foragers in the standard cross- cultural sample. Cross-Cult Res 2003;37:282-306. [Crossref] Dorjahn VR. The factor of polygyny in African demography. In: Bascom WR, Herskovits MJ, editors. Continuity and change in African cultures. University of Chicago Press, Chicago; 1959. 87-112. Lee GR. Marital structure and economic systems. J Marriage Fam 1979;41:701-13. [Crossref] Uchendu VC. Concubinage among Ngwa Igbo of Southern Ni- geria. Africa 1965;35:187-97. [Crossref] Hartung J. Polygyny and inheritance of wealth. Curr Anthropol 1982; 23:1-12. [Crossref] Al-Krenawi A, Lightman ES. Learning achievement, social adjustment, and family conflict among Bedouin-Arab children from polygamous and monogamous families. J Soc Psychol 2000;140:345-56. [Crossref] Henrich J, Boyd R, Richerson PJ. The puzzle of monogamous marriage. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2012;367:657