Dergiler / Balkan Medical Journal / 2017 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 5

Classification and Current Management of Inner Ear Malformations

Sayfa
397–411
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Hearing andlanguage outcomes after various implantation methodsare closely related to the status of the cochlear nerve, anda practical classification of the cochlear nerve deficiencyis also provided.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Morphologically congenital sensorineural hearing losscan be investigated under two categories.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The majorityof congenital hearing loss causes (80%) are membranousmalformations.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Hearing andlanguage outcomes after various implantation methodsare closely related to the status of the cochlear nerve, anda practical classification of the cochlear nerve deficiencyis also provided.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Morphologically congenital sensorineural hearing losscan be investigated under two categories. The majorityof congenital hearing loss causes (80%) are membranousmalformations. Here, the pathology involves inner earhair cells. There is no gross bony abnormality and,therefore, in these cases high-resolution computerizedtomography and magnetic resonance imaging of thetemporal bone reveal normal findings. The remaining20% have various malformations involving thebony labyrinth and, therefore, can be radiologicallydemonstrated by computerized tomography andmagnetic resonance imaging. The latter group involvessurgical challenges as well as problems in decisionmaking.Some cases may be managed by a hearing aid,others need cochlear implantation, and some cases arecandidates for an auditory brainstem implantation (ABI).During cochlear implantation, there may be facial nerveabnormalities, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, electrodemisplacement or difficulty in finding the cochlea itself.During surgery for inner ear malformations, the surgeonmust be ready to modify the surgical approach or choosespecial electrodes for surgery. In the present reviewarticle, inner ear malformations are classified accordingto the differences observed in the cochlea. Hearing andlanguage outcomes after various implantation methodsare closely related to the status of the cochlear nerve, anda practical classification of the cochlear nerve deficiencyis also provided.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SENNAROĞLU, L., BAJİN, M. D. (2022). Classification and Current Management of Inner Ear Malformations. Balkan Medical Journal, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 5, 397–411. https://ajindex.com/articles/461124

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Sennaroglu L. Cochlear implantation in inner ear malformations-a review article. Cochlear Implants Int 2010;11:4-41
  2. Lemmerling MM, Mancuso AA, Antonelli PJ, Kubilis PS. Normal modiolus: CT appearance in patients with a large vestibular aqueduct. Radiology 1997;204:213-9
  3. Sennaroglu L, Sennaroglu G, Ozgen B. Management of Inner ear Malformations, in Sataloff's Comprehensive Textbook of Otolaryngology. In: Sataloff RT, editor. JP Medical Publishers 2015:91-106
  4. Sennaroglu L. Histopathology of inner ear malformations: Do we have enough evidence to explain pathophysiology? Cochlear Implants Int; 2016;17:3-20
  5. Sennaroglu L, Colletti V, Manrique M, Laszig R, Offeciers E, Saeed S, et al. Auditory brainstem implantation in children and non-neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: a consensus statement. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:187-91
  6. McElveen JT Jr, Carrasco VN, Miyamoto RT, Linthicum FH Jr. Cochlear implantation in common cavity malformations using a transmastoid labyrinthotomy approach. Laryngoscope 1997;107:1032-6
  7. Beltrame MA, Frau GN, Shanks M, Robinson P, Anderson I. Double posterior labyrinthotomy technique: results in three Med-El patients with common cavity. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:177-82
  8. Sennaroglu L, Bajin MD, Pamuk E, Tahir E. Cochlear Hypoplasia Type Four With Anteriorly Displaced Facial Nerve Canal. Otol Neurotol 2016;37:407-9
  9. Sennaroglu L, Saatci I. A new classification for cochleovestibular malformations. Laryngoscope 2002;112: 230-41
  10. Sennaroglu L, Saatci I, Unpartitioned versus incompletely partitioned cochleae: radiologic differentiation. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:520-9
  11. Phelps PD, King A, Michaels L. Cochlear dysplasia and meningitis. Am J Otol 1994;15:551-7
  12. Sennaroglu L, Atay G, Bajin MD. A new cochlear implant electrode with a "cork"-type stopper for inner ear malformations. Auris Nasus Larynx 2014;41:331-6
  13. Lo WW. What is a 'Mondini' and what difference does a name make? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1442-4
  14. Sennaroglu L. Histopathology of inner ear malformations: Do we have enough evidence to explain pathophysiology? Cochlear Implants Int 2016;17:3-20
  15. Nance WE, Setleff R, McLeod A, Sweeney A, Cooper C, McConnell F. X-linked mixed deafness with congenital fixation of the stapedial footplate and perilymphatic gusher. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1971;7:64-9
  16. Phelps PD, Reardon W, Pembrey M, Bellman S, Luxom L. X-linked deafness, stapes gushers and a distinctive defect of the inner ear. Neuroradiol