KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Balkan Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Scoring Systems in Predicting Success of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Muzaffer AKÇAY
Yunus KAYALI
Abdulkadir TEPELER
Fatih GEVHER
Senad KALKAN
Muhammed TOSUN
Cevper ERSÖZ
Sayfa
32–36
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Excluded from the study were patients aged

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: Scoring systems are useful to inform the patients about the success and complication rates of the operation prior the surgery.Aims: To determine the applicability of the popular scoring systems (Guy’s, stone size, tract length, obstruction, number of involved calices, and essence/stone density and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society) by means of examining preoperative data of patients treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Study Design: Cross sectional study.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed files of the patients who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy in our center between 2011 and 2015.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Background: Scoring systems are useful to inform the patients about the success and complication rates of the operation prior the surgery.Aims: To determine the applicability of the popular scoring systems (Guy’s, stone size, tract length, obstruction, number of involved calices, and essence/stone density and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society) by means of examining preoperative data of patients treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Study Design: Cross sectional study.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed files of the patients who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy in our center between 2011 and 2015.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Excluded from the study were patients aged
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2011 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background: Scoring systems are useful to inform the patients about the success and complication rates of the operation prior the surgery.Aims: To determine the applicability of the popular scoring systems (Guy’s, stone size, tract length, obstruction, number of involved calices, and essence/stone density and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society) by means of examining preoperative data of patients treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Study Design: Cross sectional study.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed files of the patients who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy in our center between 2011 and 2015. Excluded from the study were patients aged

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKÇAY, M., KAYALI, Y., TEPELER, A., GEVHER, F., KALKAN, S., TOSUN, M., ERSÖZ, C. (2022). Comparison of Scoring Systems in Predicting Success of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Balkan Medical Journal, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 32–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/460956

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Moe OW. Kidney stones: pathophysiology and medical management. Lancet 2006;367:333-44.
  2. Scales CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS; Urologic Diseases in America Project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 2012;62:160-5.
  3. Ghani KR, Sammon JD, Karakiewicz PI, Sun M, Bhojani N, Sukumar S, et al. Trends in surgery for upper urinary tract calculi in the USA using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample: 1999-2009. BJU Int 2013;112:224-30.
  4. Türk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2016;69:475-82.
  5. Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS, et al. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 2005;173:1991-2000.
  6. Ghani KR, Sammon JD, Bhojani N, Karakiewicz PI, Sun M, Sukumar S, et al. Trends in percutaneous nephrolithotomy use and outcomes in the United States. J Urol 2013;190:558-64.
  7. Opondo D, Gravas S, Joyce A, Pearle M, Matsuda T, Sun YH, et al. Standardization of patient outcomes reporting in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2014;28:767-74. de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, Giusti G, Serrano A, Kandasami SV, et al. Categorization of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:246-55.
  8. Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, Sari E, Berberoglu Y, Baykal M, et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 2008;53:184-90.
  9. Turna B, Umul M, Demiryoguran S, Altay B, Nazli O. How do increasing stone surface area and stone configuration affect overall outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 2007;21:34-43.
  10. Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, Bapat S, Desai M. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol 2004;18:715-22.
  11. Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, Glass JM. The Guy’s stone score grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology 2011;78:277-81.
  12. Okhunov Z, Friedlander JI, George AK, Duty BD, Moreira DM, Srinivasan AK, et al. S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi. Urology 2013;81:1154-9.
  13. Smith A, Averch TD, Shahrour K, Opondo D, Daels FP, Labate G, et al. A nephrolithometric nomogram to predict treatment success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 2013;190:149-56.
  14. Ingimarsson JP, Dagrosa LM