Dergiler / Amasya İlahiyat Dergisi / 2018 / Sayı: 10

Kur'ân'ın Üç Aşamalı İndirilişi

Descending of The Qur’an in Echelon

Sayfa
73–100
Yayın Tarihi
2018-06-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to the obtained data, it has been detected that for expressed criticisms in recent times about the idea of “descending of The Qur’ān in three echelons” consistent answers in the integrity of traditional thought and some of these criticisms don’t reflect reality.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This article deals with discussions that have arisen on the idea of “descending of The Qur’ān in three echelons”.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This idea is one of the views about descending of the Qur’ān to the Prophet.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to the obtained data, it has been detected that for expressed criticisms in recent times about the idea of “descending of The Qur’ān in three echelons” consistent answers in the integrity of traditional thought and some of these criticisms don’t reflect reality.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Kur’ân-ı Kerîm · İnzâl · Aşamalı İndirilme

Özet

This article deals with discussions that have arisen on the idea of “descending of The Qur’ān in three echelons”. This idea is one of the views about descending of the Qur’ān to the Prophet. This idea that is based on the authentic chain of narration from Ibn Abbās is the companion, expresses that the Qur’an descended from Lawh Mahfūz to samā ad-dunyā wholly and afterwards from samā ad-dunyā to Messenger of God gradually and in connection with events in the context of the revelation. This idea that suggests the Qur’ān was a book before it was descended, is criticized especially in modern studies for some reasons. For example, it is weakening the relation between revelation and phenomenon, in addition, doesn’t take into consideration it, and it has been a place for constrained interpretations, it also disaffirms to the independence of human, it contains methodical problems, it is a reflection of the sectarian presuppositions. This Article aimed to analyze these ideas in the frame of Islamic sciences data and their integrity. According to the obtained data, it has been detected that for expressed criticisms in recent times about the idea of “descending of The Qur’ān in three echelons” consistent answers in the integrity of traditional thought and some of these criticisms don’t reflect reality.

Abstract

This article deals with discussions that have arisen on the idea of “descending of The Qur’ān in echelon”. This idea is one of the views about descending of the Qur’ān to the Prophet. This idea that is based on the authentic chain of narration from Ibn Abbās is the companion, expresses that the Qur’an descended from Lawh Mahfūz to samā ad-dunyā wholly and afterwards from samā ad-dunyā to Messenger of God gradually and in connection with events in the context of the revelation. This idea that suggests the Qur’ān was a book before it was descended, is criticized especially in modern studies for some reasons. For example, it is weakening the relation between revelation and phenomenon, in addition, doesn’t take into consideration it, and it has been a place for constrained interpretations, it also disaffirms to the independence of human, it contains methodical problems, it is a reflection of the sectarian presuppositions. This Article aimed to analyze these ideas in the frame of Islamic sciences data and their integrity. According to the obtained data, it has been detected that for expressed criticisms in recent times about the idea of “descending of The Qur’ān in echelon” consistent answers in the integrity of traditional thought.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AĞBAL, D. (2018). Kur'ân'ın Üç Aşamalı İndirilişi. Amasya İlahiyat Dergisi, Sayı: 10, 73–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/457215

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Askalânî, İbn Hacer. Nuhbetu’l-fiker. thk. Abdulhalim b. Sâlih. 1. bs. Beyrut: Dâru İbn Hazm, 2006. Ateş, Süleyman. Yüce Kur’ân’ın Çağdaş Tefsiri. 12 cilt. İstanbul: Yeni Ufuklar Neşriyat, 1991. Aydınlı, Osman. “Mu‘tezile Geleneğinin Kur’an-ı Kerim Tasavvuru”. İslâmî İlimler Dergisi. 1/1 (2006): 39-57. Baltacı, Burhan. “Tefsir Usûlünün Yeniden İnşasına Fıkıh Usûlünün Katkısı -Şâtıbî Örneği-”. Tarihten Günümüze Kur’ân İlimleri ve Tefsir Usûlü. ed. Bilal Gökkır, Necdet Yılmaz, Ömer Kara, vd., 1. bs. Ankara: İlim Yayma Vakfı Kur’an ve Tefsir Akademisi, 2009, 289-312. Beyhâkî, Ebu Bekir Ahmed b. Hüseyn. el-Esmâ ve's-sıfât. thk. Abdullah b. Muhammed el-Hâşidî. 2 cilt. Cidde: Mektebetü's-Sevâdî, 1991. Cerrahoğlu, İsmail. Tefsir Tarihi
  2. Cilt. Ankara: Fecr Yayınevi, 1996. Cevherî, Ebu’l-Hasan Ali b. el-Ca‘d. el-Müsned, thk. Abdülmehdi b. Abdülkadir. 1. bs. Kuveyt: Mektebetü'l-Felâh, 1985. Cündioğlu, Dücane. Kur'an'ı Anlamanın Anlamı. İstanbul: Tibyan Yayınları, 1995. Cündioğlu, Dücane. Söz'ün Özü -Kelâm-ı İlâhî'nin Tabiatına Dair-. 5. bs. İstanbul Kapı Yayınları, 2014. Demirci, Muhsin. Tefsir Tarihi. 22. bs. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Vakfı Yayınları, 2012. Derveze, Muhammed İzzet. et-Tefsîru’l-hadîs. 2. bs. 10 cilt. Kahire: Dâru’l-Garbi’l-İslâmî, 2000. Ebu Hayyân Endülüsî. el-Bahru’l-muhît. thk. Adil Ahmed Abdülmevcûd, Ali Muhammed Muavviz. 1. bs. 8 cilt. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye, 1993. Ebu Zeyd, Nasr Hâmid. İlahi Hitabın Tabiatı. çev. Mehmet Emin Maşalı. 3. bs. Ankara: Otto Yayınları, 2013. Elik, Hasan. Kur’an’ın Korunmuşluğu. 4. bs. İstanbul: Fikir Yayıncılık, 2014. en-Neşşâr, Ali Sami. İslam’da Felsefî Düşüncenin Doğuşu. çev. Osman Tunç. 2 cilt. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 1999. Gazâlî, Ebu Hamîd Muhammed b. Muhammed. el-İktisâd fî’l-i‘tikâd. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Minhâc, 2012. Gözeler, Esra. Kur'an Ayetlerinin Tarihlendirilmesi. 1. bs. İstanbul: Kuramer, 2016. Hâkim, Muhammed b. Abdullah en-Nisâbûrî. el-Müstedrek 'ale's-Sahihayn. thk. Mustafa Abdülkadir Ata. 2. bs. 5 cilt. Beyrut: Dâru'l-Kütübi'l-İlmiyye, 2002. Halîmî, Ebu Abdullah. el-Minhâc fî şu‘abi’l-îmân. thk. Hilmi Muhammed Fûde. 1. bs. 3 cilt. Byy: Dâru’l-Fikr, 1979. Hevvârî, Hûd b. Muhakkem. Tefsiru kitâbillâhi’l-azîz. thk. Belhâc b. Sa‘îd Şerîfî. 1. bs. 4 cilt. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Garbi’l-İslâmî, 1990. İbn Ebî Dâvud. Kitâbu’l-mesâhif. thk. Muhibbuddin Abdussubhân. 2. bs. 2 cilt. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Beşâri’l-İslâmiyye, 2002. İbn Ebî Şeybe. el-Musannef. thk. Muhammed Avvame. 1. bs. 26 cilt. Cidde: