Dergiler / Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Sığırlarda Östrus Senkronizasyonu ile Birlikte Kullanılan Döl Tutma Oranını Etkileyen Faktörler*

Practices Affecting the Conception Rates Following Oestrus Synchronisation in Cattle

Sayfa
205–210
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this review, an up- to-date data about the factors being used along with synchronisation methods and affecting the fertility rates are presented.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Abstract: Artificial insemination (AI) is the most common biotechnological method used in cattle breeding.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Numerous researchers conducted comparative studies about the effects of different synchronisation methods on the pregnancy rate.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this review, an up- to-date data about the factors being used along with synchronisation methods and affecting the fertility rates are presented.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Abstract: Artificial insemination (AI) is the most common biotechnological method used in cattle breeding. One of the most important factors on the success of AI is true determination of the oestrus. By using various oestrus synchronisation methods in cattle, the problem concerned can be resolved. Numerous researchers conducted comparative studies about the effects of different synchronisation methods on the pregnancy rate. Also, some workers investigated the effects of different synchronisation methods by using certain substances on the pregnancy rate. Considering pregnancy, some researchers stated that there was no difference between different synchronisation methods. On the other hand, some expressed that there was a marked difference between different synchronisation methods based on the pregnancy rate. Further, they indicated that there was difference between heifers and cows of same breeds exposed to the same synchronisation method. To increase the pregnancy rate and success of synchronisation, some vitamins and hormones such as Vitamin E, GnRH, Flunixin meglumine, Beta-carotene and eCG are used along with synchronisation methods in numerous studies. In this review, an up- to-date data about the factors being used along with synchronisation methods and affecting the fertility rates are presented.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKSU, E. H., PEKÇOK, D. (2022). Sığırlarda Östrus Senkronizasyonu ile Birlikte Kullanılan Döl Tutma Oranını Etkileyen Faktörler*. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 205–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/455921

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Xu ZZ., Burton LJ., McDougall S., Jolly PD., 2000. Treatment of noncyclic lactating dairy cows with progesterone and estradiol or with progesterone, GnRH, prostaglandin2α and estradiol. Journal of Dairy Science, 83, 464-470
  2. Stephen JL., Leslie KE., Ceelen HJ., Kelton DF., Keefe GP., 1998. Measures of estrus detection and pregnancy in dairy cows after administration of gonadotropin releasing hormone within an estrus synchronization program based on prostaglandin F2α. Journal of Dairy Science, 81, 375-381
  3. Senger PL., 1994. The estrus detection problem: New concepts, technologies, and possibilities. Journal Dairy Science, 77, 2745-2753
  4. Nak Y., Nak D., Seyrek İntaş K., Tek HB., Keskin A., Tuna B., 2005. Ovsynch, PRD + PGF2α + PMSG ve norgestomet içeren kulak implantı + PGF2α PMSG ile sağıtılan siklik ve asiklik sütçü ineklerde kızgınlık ve gebelik oranlarının karşılaştırılması. Uludag Universitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 33-39
  5. Pursley JR., Silcox WR., Wiltbank CM., 1998. Effect of time of artificial insemination on pregnancy rates, calving rates, pregnancy loss, gender ratio after synchronization of ovulation in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 81, 2139- 2144
  6. Baumann LE., 1988. Monitoring and predicting reproductive performance in dairy herds. Vol I and II. Dissertation Abstracts International, B- Sciences and Engineering, 49, 1049
  7. Diskin MG., Austin EJ., Roche JF., 2002. Exogenous hormonal manipulation of ovarian activity in cattle. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 23, 211- 228
  8. Demirci E., 2000. Evcil hayvanlarda reprodüksiyon, suni tohumlama ve androloji ders notları. Fırat Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Yayın Ünitesi, Elazığ
  9. Foote RH., 1975. Estrus detection and estrus detection aids. Journal of Dairy Science, 58, 248- 256
  10. Williamson NB., Morris RS., Blood DC., 1972. A study of oestrus behaviour and oestrus detection methods in a large commercial dairy herds. Veterinary Record, 91, 58-62
  11. De Rensis F., Peters AR., 1999. The control of follicular dynamics by PGF2α, GnRH, hCG and oestrus synchronization in cattle. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 34, 49-59
  12. Geary TW., Whittier JC., 1998. Effects of a timed insemination following synchronization of ovulation using the Ovsynch or Co-Synch in beef cows. Proc Animal Science, 1998,217-220 13. Nebel RL., Jobst SM., 1998. Evaluation of systematic breeding programs for lactating dairy cows: A review. Journal of Dairy Science, 81, 1169-1174. 14.