Dergiler / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

PROSTHETIC REHABILITATION OF AN ACQUIRED MAXILLARY DEFECT: 2 CASE REPORTS

Sayfa
632–638
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, in cases where implant treatments cannot be applied due to the general health problems, financial situation and contraindications, conventional obturator prosthesis rehabilitation can be applied safely.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: It’s aimed to present the prosthetic rehabilitations performed with bulb obturators of a 45-year-old male and 57- year-old female patient with large maxillary defects after tumor resection.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It was also determined that the comfort of the female patient was increased with the hollow bulb obturator applied.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, in cases where implant treatments cannot be applied due to the general health problems, financial situation and contraindications, conventional obturator prosthesis rehabilitation can be applied safely.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: It’s aimed to present the prosthetic rehabilitations performed with bulb obturators of a 45-year-old male and 57- year-old female patient with large maxillary defects after tumor resection. Case Reports: A male patient with squamous cell carcinoma and a female patient with mucoepidermoid carcinoma were scheduled to be rehabilitated with prostheses after partial maxillectomy operations. Accordingly, a bulb obturator was applied to the male patient and a hollow bulb obturator was applied to the female patient with the impressions made from the defect areas. The lower jaws of both patients with partial edentulism were rehabilitated with metal partial dentures. It has been observed that the resonance and nutrition problems of the male patient with oronasal fistula were eliminated with obturator prosthesis and facial esthetics were improved with the support of the upper lip. It was also determined that the comfort of the female patient was increased with the hollow bulb obturator applied. Conclusion: In 6-month follow-up of male patient and 12-month follow-up of female patient; the complaints about function, phonetics and esthetics occurred after resection were eliminated. The implant-supported prosthesis is known to provide a higher level of retention and stabilization in large defects. However, in cases where implant treatments cannot be applied due to the general health problems, financial situation and contraindications, conventional obturator prosthesis rehabilitation can be applied safely.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAKARYA, R. E., ALBAYRAK, B., BAYINDIR, F. (2022). PROSTHETIC REHABILITATION OF AN ACQUIRED MAXILLARY DEFECT: 2 CASE REPORTS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 632–638. https://ajindex.com/articles/451578

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Roumanas ED, Freymiller EG, Chang TL, Aghaloo T, Beumer J, 3rd. Implant-retained prostheses for facial defects: an up to 14-year follow-up report on the survival rates of implants at UCLA. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:325-32
  2. Minsley GE, Warren DW, Hinton V. Physiologic responses to maxillary resection and subsequent obturation. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:338-44
  3. Lucas RB. Ameloblastoma. In: Pathology of the Oral Diseases, ed 4. London: Churchill Livingstone: 1984. p. 31-60
  4. Hanawa S, Kitaoka A, Koyama S, Sasaki K. Influence of maxillary obturator prostheses on facial morphology in patients with unilateral maxillary defects. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:62-70
  5. Nguyen CT, Driscoll CF, Coletti DP. Reconstruction of a maxillectomy patient with an osteocutaneous flap and implant-retained fixed dental prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:292-5
  6. Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Fantasia J, Goodday R, Aghaloo T, Mehrotra B, O'Ryan F. American Association of, O.; Maxillofacial, S. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw--2014 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72:1938-56
  7. Meenakshi A, Shah D. The obturator prostheses for maxillectomy. SRM J Res Dent Sci 2012;3:193
  8. Akay C, Yaluğ S. Kısmi maksillektomi yapılmış hastaların bukkal uzantılı obturatör ile protetik rehabilitasyonu: Vaka raporu. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2014;24:278-82
  9. Ariani N, Visser A, Van Oort RP, Kusdhany L, Rahardjo T, Krom BP, Van der Mei HC, Vissink A. Current state of craniofacial prosthetic rehabilitation. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:57-67
  10. Rieger JM, Tang JA, Wolfaardt J Harris J, Seikaly H. Comparison of speech and aesthetic outcomes in patients with maxillary reconstruction versus maxillary obturators after maxillectomy. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;40:40-7
  11. Yip JK, Borrell LN, Cho SC, Francisco H, Tarnow DP. Association between oral bisphosphonate use and dental implant failure among middle-aged women. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39:408-14
  12. Chigurupati R, Aloor N, Salas R, Schmidt BL. Quality of life after maxillectomy and prosthetic obturator rehabilitation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:1471-8
  13. Dos Santos D, de Caxias F, Bitencourt S, Turcio K, Pesqueira A, Goiato M. Oral rehabilitation of patients after maxillectomy. A systematic review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;56:256-66
  14. Ali MM, Khalifa N, Alhajj MN. Quality of life and problems associated with obtura