Dergiler / Archives of Rheumatology / 2021 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4

Patient perspectives on biological treatments for inflammatory arthritis: A multi-center study in Korea

Sayfa
499–509
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Therefore, it is important for physicians to provide appropriate education and encourage patients to cooperate actively with treatment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the patient’s perception of the use of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and provide a basis for physicians to understand the patient’s perspective.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients and methods: Between December 2018 and June 2019, a total of 307 patients (162 males, 145 females; median age: 48 years; range, 18 to 81 years) were included in this investigator-initiated, multi-center, observational, and cross-sectional study in six rheumatology centers.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore, it is important for physicians to provide appropriate education and encourage patients to cooperate actively with treatment.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the patient’s perception of the use of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and provide a basis for physicians to understand the patient’s perspective. Patients and methods: Between December 2018 and June 2019, a total of 307 patients (162 males, 145 females; median age: 48 years; range, 18 to 81 years) were included in this investigator-initiated, multi-center, observational, and cross-sectional study in six rheumatology centers. We asked patients using bDMARDs to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) to complete a questionnaire regarding major considerations and satisfaction with bDMARDs, preferred administration route, knowledge about bDMARDs, experiences of adverse events, non-adherence, and expectations of their healthcare provider. The satisfaction of physician and clinical information on the patient's disease and treatment were also collected. Results: Of the patients, 139 had RA and 168 had AS. Median disease duration was six years in RA and five years in AS. A total of 80.1% of the patients and 77.1% of the physicians indicated being satisfied or very satisfied with the therapeutic effect of the current bDMARD. Most patients were open to intravenous or subcutaneous injection, with the most preferred route of administration being subcutaneous (41.3%), followed by intravenous (32.0%), and oral (26.7%). The patients considered therapeutic effect to be more important than cost or convenience while choosing a bDMARD (69.3%), and most were willing to be educated about therapeutic effects (46.1%). Only 35.2% of the patients reported well and/or very well knowledge about the therapeutic effects, side effects, and administration methods of their current bDMARD, and 86.6% cited their physician as the primary source of information about biological treatment. Conclusion: Patients value therapeutic effect more than cost or convenience while selecting a bDMARD, and consider their physicians to be the primary information source. Therefore, it is important for physicians to provide appropriate education and encourage patients to cooperate actively with treatment.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ha, Y., Choi, I. A., Kim, J. H., Chang, S. H., Song, R., Kim, H. W., Lee, J. S., Choi, B., Oh, Y., Moon, K. W. (2022). Patient perspectives on biological treatments for inflammatory arthritis: A multi-center study in Korea. Archives of Rheumatology, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4, 499–509. https://ajindex.com/articles/447999

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Selmi C, Generali E, Massarotti M, Bianchi G, Scire CA. New treatments for inflammatory rheumatic disease. Immunol Res 2014;60:277-88
  2. Fleischmann R, Tongbram V, van Vollenhoven R, Tang DH, Chung J, Collier D, et al. Systematic review and network meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor-methotrexate combination therapy versus triple therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open 2017;3:e000371
  3. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Kerschbaumer A, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:685-99. 4. van der Heijde D, Ramiro S, Landewé R, Baraliakos X, Van den Bosch F, Sepriano A, et al. 2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:978-91
  4. Grisanti L, Kwiatkowski A, Dyrda P, Field E, Grisanti J, Hatem J, et al. Patient Perspectives on Intravenous Biologics for Rheumatologic Disease. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019;71:1234-42
  5. Fayad F, Ziade NR, Merheb G, Attoui S, Aiko A, Mroue K, et al. Patient preferences for rheumatoid arthritis treatments: results from the national crosssectional LERACS study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2018;12:1619-25
  6. Cinar FI, Cinar M, Yilmaz S, Simsek I, Erdem H, Pay S. Thoughts and perceptions of ankylosing spondylitis patients with regard to TNF inhibitors. Rheumatol Int 2014;34:979-86
  7. Hazlewood GS, Bombardier C, Tomlinson G, Thorne C, Bykerk VP, Thompson A, et al. Treatment preferences of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a discrete-choice experiment. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016;55:1959-68
  8. Prevoo ML, van 't Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:44-8
  9. Machado PM, Landewé R, Heijde DV; Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS). Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS): 2018 update of the nomenclature for disease activity states. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:1539-40
  10. Gaylis NB, Sagliani J, Black S, Tang KL, DeHoratius R, Kafka WA, et al. Patient-reported outcome assessment of inflammatory arthritis patient experience with intravenously administered biologic therapy. Patient Prefer Adherence 2017;11:1