Dergiler / Archives of health science and research (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Is YouTube a Reliable Source of Medical Information About Hemophilia?

Sayfa
86–91
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: YouTube can be considered as a good source of information on hemophilia for people with hemophilia and may improve their self-management skills.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: YouTube videos have an important role in public health.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: A total of 140 videos were reviewed for the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: YouTube can be considered as a good source of information on hemophilia for people with hemophilia and may improve their self-management skills.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: YouTube videos have an important role in public health. This study aimed to assess the content, quality, and reliability of hemophilia videos on the YouTube platform. Methods: The keywords, namely, hemophilia, hemophilia factor, hemophilia inhibitors, and hemophilia treatment were used to identify videos on YouTube. The Global Quality Scale and the modified DISCERN questionnaire were used to assess the quality and reliability of videos, respectively. The videos were compared based on their quality and uploaders (physician, healthcare organization, company, patient, and independent users). Results: A total of 140 videos were reviewed for the study. There were 65 high, 51 moderate, and 24 low-quality videos. The physicians uploaded more videos and high-quality videos than others, with a few videos uploaded by patients and healthcare organizations. The like ratio was different for high-quality videos (P .05). The median Global Quality Scale and DISCERN scores of all videos were the same (3 points) and DISCERN scores increased with improved video quality (P < .05). Various significant differences were found in video characteristics between uploader groups (P < .05). The Global Quality Scale score of pysicians was significantly different when compared to other groups (P < .05). The DISCERN scores of physician videos were different compared to the patient and independent users-sourced videos (P=.006 and P=.001) and DISCERN scores of patient videos were also different from those of healthcare organization videos (P=.004). Conclusion: YouTube can be considered as a good source of information on hemophilia for people with hemophilia and may improve their self-management skills.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKBAYRAM, S., YAKUT, Y., USGU, S., GÖNEN, T. (2022). Is YouTube a Reliable Source of Medical Information About Hemophilia?. Archives of health science and research (Online), Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 86–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/447867

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Srivastava A, Brewer AK, Mauser-Bunschoten EP, et al. Treatment guidelines working group the world Federation of Hemophilia. Guidelines for the management of hemophilia. Haemophilia. 2013;19(1):1
  2. Hermans C, Makris M. “Haemophilia Guidelines for All”: a new ambition of the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH). Haemophilia. 2020;26(5):748- 749. [CrossRef] 3. Sties SW, Andreato LV, De Carvalho T, et al. Influence of exercise on oxidative stress in patients with heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2018;23(2):225- 235. [CrossRef] 4. Salen P, Babiker HM. Hemophilia A. In: StatPearls [internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2021
  3. Alshaikhli A, Rokkam VR. Hemophilia B. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2021
  4. McLaughlin P, Hurley M, Chowdary P, Khair K, Stephensen D. Physiotherapy interventions for pain management in haemophilia: a systematic review. Haemophilia. 2020;26(4):667-684. [CrossRef] 7. Garagiola I, Palla R, Peyvandi F. Risk factors for inhibitor development in severe hemophilia A. Thromb Res. 2018;168:20-27. [CrossRef] 8. Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A, et al. WFH guidelines for the management of hemophilia panelists and co-authors. WFH guidelines for the management of hemophilia. Haemophilia. 2020;26(suppl 6):1-158. [CrossRef] 9. Mcinnes N, Haglund BJ. Readability of online health information:implications for health literacy. Inform Health. Soc Ca. 2011;36(4):173-189
  5. Banchev A, Batorova A, Faganel Kotnik BF, et al. A cross-national survey of people living with hemophilia: impact on daily living and patient education in Central Europe. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021;15:871-883. [CrossRef] 11. Usgu S, Kudaş S, Taka Ö, Yakut Y. Is YouTube a reliable source for athletic taping? Sport Sci Health. 2022;18(1):227-233. [CrossRef] 12. Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A. Medical YouTube videos and methods of evaluation: literature review. JMIR Med Educ. 2018;4(1):e3. [CrossRef] 13. Farnan JM, Paro JA, Higa J, et al. The YouTube generation: implications for medical professionalism. Perspec. Biol Med. 2008;51(4):517-524
  6. Kumar N, Pandey A, Venkatraman A, Garg N. Are video sharing web sites a useful source of information on hypertension? J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8(7):481-490. [CrossRef] 15. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health Inform J. 2015;21(3):173-194. [CrossRef] 16. Brooks FM, Lawrence H, Jones A, M